Reproducibility and content validity of the Slovenian version of the STarT Back Screening Tool for chronicity risk assessment in patients with low back pain

被引:0
|
作者
Cimerman, Marinka [1 ]
Kacin, Alan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[2] Univ Ljubljana, Inst Pathophysiol, Fac Med, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[3] Univ Ljubljana, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Zdravstvena Pot 5, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
关键词
chronic low back pain; clinical assessment tool translation; content validity; Keele STarT Back questionnaire; reliability; CROSS-CULTURAL ADAPTATION; RELIABILITY; TRANSLATION; VALIDATION; DISABILITY;
D O I
10.1097/MRR.0000000000000604
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Chronic pain is the most common cause of impaired work ability and thus represents a significant social and economic burden. STarT Back Screening Tool (SBT) is the most often used screening tool for rapid identification and classification of patients for their risk of development of chronic low back pain, which is valid and reliable in the original English version and translation into other languages. The aim of the present study was to translate the SBT into Slovenian and to evaluate its content validity and reliability. We translated the SBT from English into Slovenian and back according to the standard protocol. We tested its metric properties on a group of patients with low back pain aged 18 to 65 years. The reliability of the reassessment was calculated using the ICC and specific agreement, while the content validity of the questionnaire was determined using the ceiling and floor effect. Of the 42 patients who participated in the study, 42.9% were at low risk, 33.3% were at moderate risk, and 23.8% were at high risk of developing chronic pain, according to the SBT. The ICC for the entire sample was 0.96 (95% CI 0.92-0.98). The Slovenian translation of the SBT showed excellent specific agreement between the initial and repeat assessments: 91.4% for the low-risk group, 85.7% for the moderate-risk group, and 95.2% for the high-risk group. In addition, it showed good content validity, as no ceiling or floor effects were detected. The Slovenian translation of the questionnaire is suitable for clinical use.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 354
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validity and Reliability of the French Version of the STarT Back Screening Tool for Patients With Low Back Pain
    Bruyere, Olivier
    Demoulin, Maryline
    Beaudart, Charlotte
    Hill, Jonathan C.
    Maquet, Didier
    Genevay, Stephane
    Mahieu, Genevieve
    Reginster, Jean-Yves
    Crielaard, Jean-Michel
    Demoulin, Christophe
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (02) : E123 - E128
  • [2] Validity and Reproducibility of the STarT Back Tool (Dutch Version) in Patients With Low Back Pain in Primary Care Settings
    Bier, Jasper D.
    Ostelo, Raymond W. J. G.
    van Hooff, Miranda L.
    Koes, Bart W.
    Verhagen, Arianne P.
    PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2017, 97 (05): : 561 - 570
  • [3] Validity and reliability of Turkish version of STarT Back Screening Tool
    Yilmaz Yelvar, Gul Deniz
    Dalkilinc, Murat
    Cirak, Yasemin
    Parlak Demir, Yasemin
    Karaduz, Beyza Nur
    Kolsuz, Mumine Merve
    AGRI-THE JOURNAL OF THE TURKISH SOCIETY OF ALGOLOGY, 2019, 31 (04): : 163 - 171
  • [4] Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Validity of the Chinese Version of the STarT Back Screening Tool in Patients With Low Back Pain
    Luan, Shuo
    Min, Yu
    Li, Guoqi
    Lin, Caina
    Li, Xiao
    Wu, Shaoling
    Ma, Chao
    Hill, Jonathan C.
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (16) : E974 - E979
  • [5] Construct and discriminant validity of STarT Back Screening Tool - Brazilian version
    Pilz, Bruna
    Vasconcelos, Rodrigo A.
    Teixeira, Paulo P.
    Mello, Wilson
    Marcondes, Freddy B.
    Hill, Jonathan C.
    Grossi, Debora B.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2017, 21 (01) : 69 - 73
  • [6] Validity and reproducibility of the modified STarT Back Tool (Dutch version) for patients with neck pain in primary care
    Bier, Jasper D.
    Ostelo, Raymond W. J. G.
    Koes, Bart W.
    Verhagen, Arianne P.
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2017, 31 : 22 - 29
  • [7] Factor Structure, Validity, and Reliability of the STarT Back Screening Tool in Italian Obese and Non-obese Patients With Low Back Pain
    Giusti, Emanuele Maria
    Varallo, Giorgia
    Abenavoli, Alessandra
    Manzoni, Gian Mauro
    Aletti, Luca
    Capodaglio, Paolo
    Castelnuovo, Gianluca
    Maggiani, Alberto
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [8] Transcultural adaption and psychometric properties of the STarT Back Screening Tool among Finnish low back pain patients
    Piironen, Susanna
    Paananen, Markus
    Haapea, Marianne
    Hupli, Markku
    Zitting, Paavo
    Ryynanen, Katja
    Takala, Esa-Pekka
    Korniloff, Katariina
    Hill, Jonathan C.
    Hakkinen, Arja
    Karppinen, Jaro
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (01) : 287 - 295
  • [9] Predictive validity of the STarT Back screening tool among older adults with back pain
    Vigdal, Orjan Nesse
    Flugstad, Solveig
    Storheim, Kjersti
    Killingmo, Rikke Munk
    Grotle, Margreth
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2024, 28 (09) : 1559 - 1570
  • [10] Cross-cultural validation of the start back screening tool in a Greek low back pain sample
    Billis, Evdokia
    Fousekis, Konstantinos
    Tsekoura, Maria
    Lampropoulou, Sofia
    Matzaroglou, Charalampos
    Gliatis, John
    Sinopidis, Christos
    Hill, Jonathan
    Strimpakos, Nikolaos
    MUSCULOSKELETAL SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2021, 53