Multidisciplinary considerations of fairness in medical AI: A scoping review

被引:4
作者
Wang, Yue [1 ]
Song, Yaxin [1 ]
Ma, Zhuo [1 ]
Han, Xiaoxue [2 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Law, 28 Xianning West Rd, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Jiaotong Univ Lib, 28 Xianning West Rd, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; Medical AI; Fairness; Data; Algorithm; Bias; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105175
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Introduction: Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has been developed significantly in recent years. The fairness of medical AI is of great concern due to its direct relation to human life and health. This review aims to analyze the existing research literature on fairness in medical AI from the perspectives of computer science, medical science, and social science (including law and ethics). The objective of the review is to examine the similarities and differences in the understanding of fairness, explore influencing factors, and investigate potential measures to implement fairness in medical AI across English and Chinese literature.Methods: This study employed a scoping review methodology and selected the following databases: Web of Science, MEDLINE, Pubmed, OVID, CNKI, WANFANG Data, etc., for the fairness issues in medical AI through February 2023. The search was conducted using various keywords such as "artificial intelligence," "machine learning," "medical," "algorithm," "fairness," "decision-making," and "bias." The collected data were charted, synthesized, and subjected to descriptive and thematic analysis.Results: After reviewing 468 English papers and 356 Chinese papers, 53 and 42 were included in the final analysis. Our results show the three different disciplines all show significant differences in the research on the core issues. Data is the foundation that affects medical AI fairness in addition to algorithmic bias and human bias. Legal, ethical, and technological measures all promote the implementation of medical AI fairness.Conclusions: Our review indicates a consensus regarding the importance of data fairness as the foundation for achieving fairness in medical AI across multidisciplinary perspectives. However, there are substantial discrepancies in core aspects such as the concept, influencing factors, and implementation measures of fairness in medical AI. Consequently, future research should facilitate interdisciplinary discussions to bridge the cognitive gaps between different fields and enhance the practical implementation of fairness in medical AI.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] "Just" accuracy? Procedural fairness demands explainability in AI-based medical resource allocations
    Rueda, Jon
    Delgado Rodriguez, Janet
    Parra Jounou, Iris
    Hortal-Carmona, Joaquin
    Ausin, Txetxu
    Rodriguez-Arias, David
    AI & SOCIETY, 2024, 39 (03) : 1411 - 1422
  • [32] Why fairness cannot be automated: Bridging the gap between EU non-discrimination law and AI
    Wachter, Sandra
    Mittelstadt, Brent
    Russell, Chris
    COMPUTER LAW & SECURITY REVIEW, 2021, 41
  • [33] Beyond ideals: why the (medical) AI industry needs to motivate behavioural change in line with fairness and transparency values, and how it can do it
    Liefgreen, Alice
    Weinstein, Netta
    Wachter, Sandra
    Mittelstadt, Brent
    AI & SOCIETY, 2024, 39 (05) : 2183 - 2199
  • [34] Understanding the factors influencing acceptability of AI in medical imaging domains among healthcare professionals: A scoping review
    Hua, David
    Petrina, Neysa
    Young, Noel
    Cho, Jin-Gun
    Poon, Simon K.
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2024, 147
  • [35] Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: A Multidisciplinary Survey
    Fabris, Alessandro
    Wska, Nina barano
    Dennis, Matthew j.
    Graus, David
    Hacker, Philipp
    Saldi Var, Jorge
    Borgesius, Frederik zuiderveen
    Biega, Asia j.
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [36] Approaches for the Use of AI in Workplace Health Promotion and Prevention: Systematic Scoping Review
    Lange, Martin
    Loewe, Alexandra
    Kayser, Ina
    Schaller, Andrea
    JMIR AI, 2024, 3
  • [37] Bias in algorithms of AI systems developed for COVID-19: A scoping review
    Delgado, Janet
    de Manuel, Alicia
    Parra, Iris
    Moyano, Cristian
    Rueda, Jon
    Guersenzvaig, Ariel
    Ausin, Txetxu
    Cruz, Maite
    Casacuberta, David
    Puyol, Angel
    JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY, 2022, 19 (03) : 407 - 419
  • [38] Trustworthy AI Guidelines in Biomedical Decision-Making Applications: A Scoping Review
    Mora-Cantallops, Marcal
    Garcia-Barriocanal, Elena
    Sicilia, Miguel-Angel
    BIG DATA AND COGNITIVE COMPUTING, 2024, 8 (07)
  • [39] Towards fair AI: a review of bias and fairness in machine intelligence
    Venkatesha Kurumayya
    Journal of Computational Social Science, 2025, 8 (3):
  • [40] Considerations on the basis of medical reasoning for the use in AI applications
    Koumpis, Adamantios
    Graefe, Adam S. L.
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 11