Multidisciplinary considerations of fairness in medical AI: A scoping review

被引:4
|
作者
Wang, Yue [1 ]
Song, Yaxin [1 ]
Ma, Zhuo [1 ]
Han, Xiaoxue [2 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Law, 28 Xianning West Rd, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Xian Jiaotong Univ Lib, 28 Xianning West Rd, Xian 710049, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; Medical AI; Fairness; Data; Algorithm; Bias; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; CARE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105175
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Introduction: Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has been developed significantly in recent years. The fairness of medical AI is of great concern due to its direct relation to human life and health. This review aims to analyze the existing research literature on fairness in medical AI from the perspectives of computer science, medical science, and social science (including law and ethics). The objective of the review is to examine the similarities and differences in the understanding of fairness, explore influencing factors, and investigate potential measures to implement fairness in medical AI across English and Chinese literature.Methods: This study employed a scoping review methodology and selected the following databases: Web of Science, MEDLINE, Pubmed, OVID, CNKI, WANFANG Data, etc., for the fairness issues in medical AI through February 2023. The search was conducted using various keywords such as "artificial intelligence," "machine learning," "medical," "algorithm," "fairness," "decision-making," and "bias." The collected data were charted, synthesized, and subjected to descriptive and thematic analysis.Results: After reviewing 468 English papers and 356 Chinese papers, 53 and 42 were included in the final analysis. Our results show the three different disciplines all show significant differences in the research on the core issues. Data is the foundation that affects medical AI fairness in addition to algorithmic bias and human bias. Legal, ethical, and technological measures all promote the implementation of medical AI fairness.Conclusions: Our review indicates a consensus regarding the importance of data fairness as the foundation for achieving fairness in medical AI across multidisciplinary perspectives. However, there are substantial discrepancies in core aspects such as the concept, influencing factors, and implementation measures of fairness in medical AI. Consequently, future research should facilitate interdisciplinary discussions to bridge the cognitive gaps between different fields and enhance the practical implementation of fairness in medical AI.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ethical, legal, and social considerations of AI-based medical decision-support tools: A scoping review
    Cartolovni, Anto
    Tomicic, Ana
    Mosler, Elvira Lazic
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 161
  • [2] AI and disability: A systematic scoping review
    El Morr, Christo
    Kundi, Bushra
    Mobeen, Fariah
    Taleghani, Sarah
    El-Lahib, Yahya
    Gorman, Rachel
    HEALTH INFORMATICS JOURNAL, 2024, 30 (03)
  • [3] Toward Fairness, Accountability, Transparency, and Ethics in AI for Social Media and Health Care: Scoping Review
    Singhal, Aditya
    Neveditsin, Nikita
    Tanveer, Hasnaat
    Mago, Vijay
    JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 12
  • [4] A scoping review of reporting gaps in FDA-approved AI medical devices
    Muralidharan, Vijaytha
    Adewale, Boluwatife Adeleye
    Huang, Caroline J.
    Nta, Mfon Thelma
    Ademiju, Peter Oluwaduyilemi
    Pathmarajah, Pirunthan
    Hang, Man Kien
    Adesanya, Oluwafolajimi
    Abdullateef, Ridwanullah Olamide
    Babatunde, Abdulhammed Opeyemi
    Ajibade, Abdulquddus
    Onyeka, Sonia
    Cai, Zhou Ran
    Daneshjou, Roxana
    Olatunji, Tobi
    NPJ DIGITAL MEDICINE, 2024, 7 (01):
  • [5] Randomised controlled trials in medical AI: ethical considerations
    Grote, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2022, 48 (11) : 899 - 906
  • [6] Mapping and Summarizing the Research on AI Systems for Automating Medical History Taking and Triage: Scoping Review
    Siira, Elin
    Johansson, Hanna
    Nygren, Jens
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2025, 27
  • [7] Fairness of AI in Predicting the Risk of Recidivism: Review and Phase Mapping of AI Fairness Techniques
    Farayola, Michael Mayowa
    Tal, Irina
    Saber, Takfarinas
    Connolly, Regina
    Bendechache, Malika
    18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AVAILABILITY, RELIABILITY & SECURITY, ARES 2023, 2023,
  • [8] A Survey of Bias and Fairness in Healthcare AI
    Mienye, Lbomoiye Domor
    Obaido, George
    Emmanuel, Ikiomoye Douglas
    Ajani, Ayodeji Akeem
    2024 IEEE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTHCARE INFORMATICS, ICHI 2024, 2024, : 642 - 650
  • [9] Teaching AI Ethics in Medical Education: A Scoping Review of Current Literature and Practices
    Weidener, Lukas
    Fischer, Michael
    PERSPECTIVES ON MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2023, 12 (01) : 399 - 410
  • [10] Fairness in AI applications
    Shelley, Cameron
    2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TECHNOLOGY AND SOCIETY (ISTAS21): TECHNOLOGICAL STEWARDSHIP & RESPONSIBLE INNOVATION, 2021,