Does green finance stimulate green innovation of heavy-polluting enterprises? Evidence from green finance pilot zones in China

被引:19
作者
Ran, Chenyang [1 ]
Zhang, Yuru [2 ]
机构
[1] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Petr, Sch Econ & Management, Qingdao 266580, Peoples R China
关键词
Green finance; China's GFRI pilot zones; Green innovation; Green patent; DDD method; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATIONS; PRODUCTIVITY; IMPACT; POLICY; CREDIT; COST; FIRM;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-023-26758-z
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
There is a relative dearth of empirical studies quantitatively analyzing the implementation effect of green finance reform and innovation pilot zones (GFRIs) on green innovation at the micro-enterprise level. Thus, this paper aims to construct the difference-in-difference-in-difference method to explore the influence of Chinese GFRIs on corporate green innovation of heavy-polluting enterprises based on green patent data. Results show that the pilot policy has significantly decreased green patents of heavy-polluting enterprises by approximately 42.64%, indicating that the policy has a significant innovation inhibition effect and fails to exert the Porter effect. Furthermore, establishing GFRIs has a more effective inhibition effect on the green invention patent than the green utility model patent. Moreover, although enterprises of different scales have different innovation capabilities, the negative impact of GFRIs on green innovation of heavy-polluting enterprises is widespread. Still, the negative impact is more pronounced for big-scale enterprises. The above empirical evidence is essential in formulating green finance development strategies and promoting green economic transformation.
引用
收藏
页码:60678 / 60693
页数:16
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Comparative Politics and the Synthetic Control Method [J].
Abadie, Alberto ;
Diamond, Alexis ;
Hainmueller, Jens .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 59 (02) :495-510
[2]   Green Credit, Green Stimulus, Green Revolution? China's Mobilization of Banks for Environmental Cleanup [J].
Aizawa, Motoko ;
Yang, Chaofei .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT & DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 19 (02) :119-144
[3]   Productivity growth and environmental regulation in Mexican and US food manufacturing [J].
Alpay, E ;
Buccola, S ;
Kerkvliet, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 84 (04) :887-901
[4]   THE IMPACT OF ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATIONS ON INDUSTRY PRODUCTIVITY - DIRECT AND INDIRECT EFFECTS [J].
BARBERA, AJ ;
MCCONNELL, VD .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1990, 18 (01) :50-65
[5]   How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Duflo, E ;
Mullainathan, S .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 119 (01) :249-275
[6]   The impact of environmental constraints on productivity improvement in integrated paper plants [J].
Boyd, GA ;
McClelland, JD .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1999, 38 (02) :121-142
[7]   Does environmental regulation drive away inbound foreign direct investment? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China [J].
Cai, Xiqian ;
Lu, Yi ;
Wu, Mingqin ;
Yu, Linhui .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2016, 123 :73-85
[8]  
Chen X.Y., 2020, Guangdong Soc Sci, V4, P41, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1000-114X.2020.04.004, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-114X.2020.04.004]
[9]   Do carbon emission trading schemes stimulate green innovation in enterprises? Evidence from China [J].
Chen, Zhongfei ;
Zhang, Xiao ;
Chen, Fanglin .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 168
[10]   Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: A patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies [J].
Costantini, Valeria ;
Crespi, Francesco ;
Palma, Alessandro .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2017, 46 (04) :799-819