Efficacy and safety of HAIC alone vs. HAIC combined with lenvatinib for treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

被引:8
|
作者
Long, Fang [1 ]
Chen, Shali [2 ]
Li, Ruidong [3 ]
Lin, Yinsheng [3 ]
Han, Jian [3 ]
Guo, Jiandong [3 ]
Chen, Yongxin [3 ]
Li, Chengzhi [3 ]
Song, Peng [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Jinan Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Affiliated Hosp 1, 613 West Huangpu Ave, Guangzhou 510630, Peoples R China
[2] Jinan Univ, Dept Cardiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, 613 West Huangpu Ave, Guangzhou 510630, Peoples R China
[3] Jinan Univ, Dept Intervent Radiol & Vasc Surg, Affiliated Hosp 1, 613 West Huangpu Ave, Guangzhou 510630, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Med Ctr 2, Dept Oncol, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Peoples Liberat Army Gen Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Geriatr Dis, Beijing 100853, Peoples R China
关键词
HAIC; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Lenvatinib; Survival outcomes;
D O I
10.1007/s12032-023-02012-x
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
To investigate efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with lenvatinib (HAIC-Len) and HAIC alone for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (Ad-HCC). Totally 349 patients with Ad-HCC participated in the research from February 2018 to October 2020. On the basis of propensity score matching (PSM), 132 and 110 cases were assigned to the HAIC group and the HAIC-Len group, respectively, with a ratio of 1:1. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and complications were compared between two groups. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were utilized to estimate cumulative OS and PFS. Additionally, uni- and multi-variate Cox regression models were employed to identify significant independent factors. The median follow-up period in this study was set to be 20.8 months. Following PSM, the one-, two- and three-year cumulative OS rates in the HAIC-Len and HAIC groups were 63.6%, 12.1%, and 3.0%, and 47.2%, 11.8%, and 2.7%, respectively, with a significant difference (P < 0.001). The first-three-year cumulative incidence rates PFS in the HAIC-Len and the HAIC groups were 15.2%, 1.5%, and ND, and 11.8%, 4.5%, and 3.6%, respectively, with no significant difference detected (P = 0.092). BMI (HR 0.709. 95% CI 0.549, 0.915. P = 0.008) and AST (HR 1.005. 95% CI 1.003, 1.007. P < 0.001) represented independent prognostic factors for OS. Additionally, the two groups exhibited no significant difference in the incidence rates of adverse events. HAIC-Len significantly improved survival outcomes of patients with Ad-HCC and demonstrated acceptable toxicity compared to HAIC alone.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Efficacy and Safety of TACE Combined with Lenvatinib and PD-(L)1 Inhibitor in the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study
    Yang, Hui
    Yang, Tiequan
    Qiu, Guangpin
    Liu, Jie
    JOURNAL OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA, 2023, 10 : 1435 - 1443
  • [42] Comparative efficacy of tislelizumab plus lenvatinib and tislelizumab alone against advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after lenvatinib failure: a real-world study
    Jiajin Yang
    Qiuping Xu
    Sihao Luo
    Jianbing Wu
    BMC Cancer, 25 (1)
  • [43] Efficacy of lenvatinib versus sorafenib in the primary treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis
    Jaiswal, Vikash
    Hameed, Maha
    Naz, Sidra
    Roy, Poulami
    Deb, Novonil
    Ukrani, Janta
    Mohan, Gautham Varun Krishna
    Taha, Amira M.
    Huang, Helen
    Kumar, Vikash
    Vachhani, Bhavyakumar
    Attia, Abdelrahman M.
    Nath, Supti D.
    Solimn, Mostafa A.
    Mukherjee, Dattatreya
    JGH OPEN, 2023, 7 (12): : 832 - 840
  • [44] HAIC Combined with lenvatinib plus PD-1 versus lenvatinib Plus PD-1 in patients with high-risk advanced HCC: a real-world study
    Chang, Xu
    Li, Xinge
    Sun, Peng
    Li, Zhenfeng
    Sun, Pengfei
    Ning, Shangkun
    BMC CANCER, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [45] Safety and efficacy of sorafenib followed by regorafenib or lenvatinib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
    Terashima, Takeshi
    Yamashita, Tatsuya
    Takata, Noboru
    Takeda, Yasuhito
    Kido, Hidenori
    Iida, Noriho
    Kitahara, Masaaki
    Shimakami, Tetsuro
    Takatori, Hajime
    Arai, Kuniaki
    Kawaguchi, Kazunori
    Kitamura, Kazuya
    Yamashita, Taro
    Sakai, Yoshio
    Mizukoshi, Eishiro
    Honda, Masao
    Kaneko, Shuichi
    HEPATOLOGY RESEARCH, 2021, 51 (02) : 190 - 200
  • [46] Sorafenib vs. Lenvatinib as First-line Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis
    Kuzuya, Teiji
    Ishigami, Masatoshi
    Ito, Takanori
    Ishizu, Yoji
    Honda, Takashi
    Ishikawa, Tetsuya
    Fujishiro, Mitsuhiro
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2020, 40 (04) : 2283 - 2290
  • [47] Sorafenib vs. Lenvatinib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after atezolizumab/bevacizumab failure: A real-world study
    Chon, Young Eun
    Kim, Dong Yun
    Kim, Mi Na
    Kim, Beom Kyung
    Kim, Seung Up
    Park, Yong
    Ahn, Sang Hoon
    Ha, Yeonjung
    Lee, Joo Ho
    Lee, Kwan Sik
    Kang, Beodeul
    Kim, Jung Sun
    Chon, Hong Jae
    Kim, Do Young
    CLINICAL AND MOLECULAR HEPATOLOGY, 2024, 30 (03) : 345 - 359
  • [48] Efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with programmed cell death protein-1 antibody and lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
    Xu, Yongkang
    Fu, Shumin
    Mao, Ye
    Huang, Shenglan
    Li, Dan
    Wu, Jianbing
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [49] PD(L)1 Inhibitors Plus Lenvatinib Vs Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Combined With HAIC for Unresectable HCC: A Propensity Score Matching Study
    He, Zhaoqian
    Chen, Hua
    Liang, Chen
    Tang, Xiang
    Xie, Feihu
    Liu, Qi
    Zheng, Yun
    IMMUNOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2025, 14 : 51 - 63
  • [50] Clinical efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Du, Sihao
    Cao, Ke
    Wang, Zhenshun
    Lin, Dongdong
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (23) : E33852