Effect of different doses of dexmedetomidine on the median effective concentration of propofol during gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial

被引:6
作者
Chen, Hai-yan [1 ]
Deng, Fang [1 ]
Tang, Shu-heng [1 ]
Liu, Wen [1 ]
Yang, Hua [1 ,2 ]
Song, Jin-Chao [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Shanghai Sci & Technol, Shidong Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Shanghai Sci & Technol, Shidong Hosp Shanghai, Dept Anesthesiol, Shiguang Rd, 999, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
dexmedetomidine; gastrointestinal endoscopy; propofol; median effective concentration; RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; CONSCIOUS SEDATION; DOUBLE-BLIND; ANESTHESIA; COMBINATION; HYDROCHLORIDE; SATISFACTION; VENTILATION; MIDAZOLAM; KETAMINE;
D O I
10.1111/bcp.15647
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
AimsDexmedetomidine could be an ideal adjuvant to propofol during gastrointestinal endoscopy because it provides both analgesia and sedation without respiratory depression. This study investigates the effect of different doses of dexmedetomidine on the median effective concentration of propofol during gastrointestinal endoscopy. MethodsNinety adult patients were randomly assigned to Group Control, Group DEX0.5 (0.5 mu g/kg dexmedetomidine) or Group DEX1.0 (1.0 mu g/kg dexmedetomidine). Anaesthesia during endoscopy was implemented by plasma target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol with different doses of dexmedetomidine. TCI concentration of the first patient for each group was 2.5 mu g/mL and the consecutive adjacent concentration gradient was 0.5 mu g/mL. Median effective concentration (EC50) of propofol by TCI for gastrointestinal endoscopy was determined by using the modified Dixon's up-and-down method. Cardiovascular variables were also measured. ResultsEC(50) of propofol by TCI and 95% confidence interval (CI) for gastrointestinal endoscopy were 3.77 (3.48-4.09), 2.51 (2.27-2.78) and 2.10 (1.90-2.33) mu g/mL in Group Control, Group DEX0.5 and Group DEX1.0, respectively. The average percent change from heart rate (HR) baseline was 2.8 (8.9), -7.4 (7.7) and -10.5 (8.8) (P < .001), and the average percent change from mean arterial pressure (MAP) baseline was -10.6 [-24.7; 3.5], -9.5 [-29.2; 11.4] and -4.0 [-27.3; 15.5] (P = .034) in Group Control, Group DEX0.5 and Group DEX1.0, respectively. ConclusionsDexmedetomidine reduced the EC50 of propofol by TCI. A 0.5-1 mu g/kg dose of dexmedetomidine caused a decrease in HR without bradycardia. The decrease in dosage of propofol with increasing doses of dexmedetomidine caused more stable MAP. Dexmedetomidine is an ideal adjuvant drug to propofol during gastrointestinal endoscopy.
引用
收藏
页码:1799 / 1808
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Dexmedetomidine Clearance Decreases with Increasing Drug Exposure: Implications for Current Dosing Regimens and Target-controlled Infusion Models Assuming Linear Pharmacokinetics [J].
Alvarez-Jimenez, Ricardo ;
Weerink, Maud A. S. ;
Hannivoort, Laura N. ;
Su, Hong ;
Struys, Michel M. R. F. ;
Loer, Stephan A. ;
Colin, Pieter J. .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 136 (02) :279-292
[2]   The efficacy, side effects, and recovery characteristics of dexmedetomidine versus propofol when used for intraoperative sedation [J].
Arain, SR ;
Ebert, TJ .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2002, 95 (02) :461-466
[3]   EFFECTS OF INTRAVENOUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE IN HUMANS .1. SEDATION, VENTILATION, AND METABOLIC-RATE [J].
BELLEVILLE, JP ;
WARD, DS ;
BLOOR, BC ;
MAZE, M .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 77 (06) :1125-1133
[4]   Dexmedetomidine [J].
Bhana, N ;
Goa, KL ;
McClellan, KJ .
DRUGS, 2000, 59 (02) :263-268
[5]  
Bharati Saswata, 2011, Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan, V49, P165, DOI 10.1016/j.aat.2011.11.010
[6]   Monitored Anesthesia Care with Dexmedetomidine: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Trial [J].
Candiotti, Keith A. ;
Bergese, Sergio D. ;
Bokesch, Paula M. ;
Feldman, Marc A. ;
Wisemandle, Wayne ;
Bekker, Alex Y. .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2010, 110 (01) :47-56
[7]   Dexmedetomidine: a review of clinical applications [J].
Carollo, Dominic S. ;
Nossaman, Bobby D. ;
Ramadhyani, Usha .
CURRENT OPINION IN ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2008, 21 (04) :457-461
[8]   HEMODYNAMIC-CHANGES DURING ANESTHESIA INDUCED AND MAINTAINED WITH PROPOFOL [J].
CLAEYS, MA ;
GEPTS, E ;
CAMU, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1988, 60 (01) :3-9
[9]   Dexmedetomidine pharmacodynamics in healthy volunteers: 2. Haemodynamic profile [J].
Colin, P. J. ;
Hannivoort, L. N. ;
Eleveld, D. J. ;
Reyntjens, K. M. E. M. ;
Absalom, A. R. ;
Vereecke, H. E. M. ;
Struys, M. M. R. F. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 119 (02) :211-220
[10]   Dexmedetomidine pharmacokineticpharmacodynamic modelling in healthy volunteers: 1. Influence of arousal on bispectral index and sedation [J].
Colin, P. J. ;
Hannivoort, L. N. ;
Eleveld, D. J. ;
Reyntjens, K. M. E. M. ;
Absalom, A. R. ;
Vereecke, H. E. M. ;
Struys, M. M. R. F. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2017, 119 (02) :200-210