National work-family policies and the occupational segregation of women and mothers in European countries, 1999-2016

被引:11
作者
Hook, Jennifer L. [1 ]
Li, Meiying [1 ]
Paek, Eunjeong [1 ]
Cotter, Brigid [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Sociol, 851 Downey Way,Hazel Stanley Hall 314, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
关键词
MULTILEVEL MODELS; GENDER; LABOR; INEQUALITY; EMPLOYMENT; GAP; OPPORTUNITIES; TRADEOFFS; PARADOX; SWEDISH;
D O I
10.1093/esr/jcac046
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Some scholars hypothesize that although work-family policies help incorporate women into the labour market, they do so by integrating women, and mothers specifically, into female-dominated occupations. Some suggest that although these policies are 'good' for lower educated women, they harm higher educated women by concentrating them in female-dominated professions. We revisit this debate using the highest quality data brought to bear on this question to date. We use the EU Labour Force Survey 1999-2016 (n = 21 countries, 235 country-years, 2.5 million men and women aged 20-44), combined with an original collection of country-year indicators. Specifically, we examine how the two most widely studied work-family policies-paid parental leave and early childhood education and care (ECEC)-and public sector size affect occupational segregation for men and women by educational attainment and parental status. We find no evidence that 'generous' welfare states promote segregation. Rather, a specific policy-parental leave in excess of 9 months-promotes segregation between men and women broadly, but most acutely for non-tertiary-educated mothers. Findings are generally null for paid leave of up to 9 months. ECEC is associated with greater integration, particularly for tertiary-educated women. Large public sectors are associated with segregation, with both tertiary-educated men and women more likely to work in feminized occupations. Public sector size, however, is not as tightly bundled with work-family policies as previous work suggests.
引用
收藏
页码:280 / 300
页数:21
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]   The Parity Penalty in Life Course Perspective: Motherhood and Occupational Status in 13 European Countries [J].
Abendroth, Anja-Kristin ;
Huffman, Matt L. ;
Treas, Judith .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2014, 79 (05) :993-1014
[2]  
Aisenbrey S, 2009, SOC FORCES, V88, P573
[3]  
Anker Richard., 1998, GENDER JOBS SEX SEGR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Education at a glance 2018: OECD indicators, P462, DOI [10.1787/eag-2018-en, DOI 10.1787/EAG-2018-EN]
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Government at a Glance
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, OECD Family Database
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2015, World Values Survey. Analizado el 04 de 02 de 2016
[8]   Why do some occupations offer more part-time work than others? Reciprocal dynamics in occupational gender segregation and occupational part-time work in West Germany, 1976-2010 [J].
Baechmann, Ann-Christin ;
Gatermann, Doerthe ;
Kleinert, Corinna ;
Leuze, Kathrin .
SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2022, 104
[9]   Part-time employment as a way to increase women's employment: (Where) does it work? [J].
Barbieri, Paolo ;
Cutuli, Giorgio ;
Guetto, Raffaele ;
Scherer, Stefani .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE SOCIOLOGY, 2019, 60 (04) :249-268
[10]   Are women over-represented in dead-end jobs? A Swedish study using empirically derived measures of dead-end jobs [J].
Bihagen, Erik ;
Ohls, Marita .
SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2007, 84 (02) :159-177