Evaluation of groundwater quality indices using multi-criteria decision-making techniques and a fuzzy logic model in an irrigated area

被引:8
|
作者
Abidi, Jamila Hammami [1 ]
Elzain, Hussam Eldin [2 ]
Sabarathinam, Chidambaram [3 ]
Selmane, Tahar [4 ,5 ]
Selvam, Sekar [6 ]
Farhat, Boutheina [1 ]
Ben Mammou, Abdallah [1 ]
Senapathi, Venkatramanan [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tunis El Manar, Fac Sci Tunis, Lab Mineral Resources & Environm, Tunis 2092, Tunisia
[2] Sultan Qaboos Univ, Water Res Ctr, POB 17, Al Khoud 123, Oman
[3] Kuwait Inst Sci Res, Water Res Ctr, Safat, Kuwait
[4] Univ Msila, VEHDD Lab, Msila 28000, Algeria
[5] Univ Ghardaia, Dept Hydraul & Civil Engn, Ghardaia 47000, Algeria
[6] VO Chidambaram Coll, Dept Geol, Tuticorin 628008, Tamil Nadu, India
[7] Alagappa Univ, Dept Geol, Karaikkudi 630003, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
Water quality index; Entropy water quality index; Irrigation water quality indices; Fuzzy logic; GIS; WATER-QUALITY; RIVER-BASIN; DRINKING; PURPOSES; DISTRICT; GIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101122
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The quality of water for irrigation presents a fundamental challenge to the sustainability of agricultural practices. This study, conducted in the Ras Jbel (RJ) aquifer of Tunisia, aims to evaluate the suitability of groundwater for both drinking and irrigation purposes and to identify regions suitable for agriculture. In this research, various indices were employed, including water quality index (WQI), entropy water quality index (EWQI), and Fuzzy logic for irrigation water quality index (FLIWQ). The conventional irrigation indices, such as sodium adsorption ratio (SAR), magnesium hazard (MH), sodium percentage (Na%), Kelly's ratio (KR), permeability index (PI), residual sodium carbonate (RSC), and potential salinity (PS) were converted into fuzzy membership and produced dry and wet seasons maps. The dry and wet season fuzzy logic maps were used as input for final FLIWQI. Eighty-nine groundwater samples were collected from shallow wells and analyzed for major cations and anions. Most parameters exceeded the recommended values for drinking, according to both WHO and Tunisian standards, across all samples. The results of the WQI and EWQI indicated that, during the wet season, over 90% and 86% of the water samples were classified as poor and very poor quality, respectively, compared to 93.33% and 49% during the dry season. For IWQI, the wet season fuzzy logic map suggests 55.57% groundwater suitability, mainly in the central area. In the dry season, the map indicates 41.11% suitability for irrigation. The FLIWQI map confirms that the groundwater in the central part of the study area is suitable for agriculture. This study can help decision -makers initiate efficient water quality management plans in similar water -scarce environments worldwide.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Groundwater quality classification derivation using Multi-Criteria-Decision-Making techniques
    Zahedi, Sina
    Azarnivand, Ali
    Chitsaz, Nastaran
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 78 : 243 - 252
  • [32] Identification of groundwater potential recharge zones in a Tunisian anthropogenic coastal region: Insights from multi-criteria decision-making techniques
    Slimani, Fatma Ezzahra
    Zghibi, Adel
    Elomri, Adel
    Aloui, Sarra
    Naeem, Khawar
    Merzougui, Amira
    Msaddek, Mohamed Haythem
    Chekirbene, Anis
    JOURNAL OF AFRICAN EARTH SCIENCES, 2024, 209
  • [33] Delineation of Groundwater Potential Zones of Coastal Groundwater Basin Using Multi-Criteria Decision Making Technique
    Mandal, Uday
    Sahoo, Satiprasad
    Munusamy, Selva Balaji
    Dhar, Anirban
    Panda, Sudhindra N.
    Kar, Amlanjyoti
    Mishra, Prasanta K.
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2016, 30 (12) : 4293 - 4310
  • [34] Dynamic and Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Regional Safety Assessment Ranking
    Caylor, Justine P.
    Hammell, Robert J.
    2022 JOINT 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND 23RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ADVANCED INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (SCIS&ISIS), 2022,
  • [35] Smart City Wildfire Risk Analysis with Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Rani, Rekha
    Potika, Katerina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SEMANTIC COMPUTING, 2024, 18 (03) : 347 - 381
  • [36] Evaluation of NEA deflection techniques. A fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making analysis for planetary defense
    Sanchez-Lozano, J. M.
    Fernandez-Martinez, M.
    Saucedo-Fernandez, A. A.
    Trigo-Rodriguez, Josep M.
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 2020, 176 : 383 - 397
  • [37] The use of fuzzy logic to evaluate the nonlinearity of human multi-criteria used in decision making
    Salabun, Wojciech
    PRZEGLAD ELEKTROTECHNICZNY, 2012, 88 (10B): : 235 - 238
  • [38] Delineation of Groundwater Potential Using the Bivariate Statistical Models and Hybridized Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Models
    Kocyigit, Musteyde Baduna
    Akay, Huseyin
    WATER, 2024, 16 (22)
  • [39] Multi-criteria decision-making model for whole life costing design
    Wang, Nannan
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2011, 7 (06) : 441 - 452
  • [40] Using virtual environments and agent models in multi-criteria decision-making
    Bishop, Ian D.
    Stock, Christian
    Williams, Kathryn J.
    LAND USE POLICY, 2009, 26 (01) : 87 - 94