The role of public external knowledge for firm innovativeness

被引:1
作者
Garcia-Vega, Maria [1 ]
Vicente-Chirivella, Oscar [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Econ, Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[2] Univ Valencia, Dept Econ Anal, Avd Naranjos S-N, Valencia 46022, Spain
关键词
Public research organizations; Universities; External; Firm innovativeness; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER; RESEARCH ORGANIZATIONS; MODERATING ROLE; UNIVERSITY; COMMERCIALIZATION; PERFORMANCE; COOPERATION; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijindorg.2024.103056
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Public research organizations (PROs) and universities receive large amounts of public funding for the generation and transmission of knowledge, and companies contract external knowledge from both. An important question for the management of a firm's R&D and for public innovation policies is: What is more beneficial for the generation of firm innovations, external knowledge created by PROs or by universities? In this paper, we assess the impact of external knowledge from PROs versus universities on firm innovativeness. We use information on R&D acquisitions from a panel dataset of more than 10,000 Spanish firms from 2005 to 2014. We show that external knowledge from PROs and universities increases firm innovativeness. Our results suggest that knowledge generated by PROs is more sensitive to the absorptive capacity of the firm than knowledge generated by universities. This has implications for research policy, R&D management, and organizational strategies of firms' knowledge activities. Firms with low absorptive capacities benefit relatively more from knowledge generated by universities than from knowledge generated by PROs. Moreover, R&D managers should plan both their external and internal R&D if they acquire external R&D from PROs.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Firm innovativeness and work-life balance
    Alegre, Joaquin
    Pasamar, Susana
    TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT, 2018, 30 (04) : 421 - 433
  • [42] Process Innovativeness and Firm Performance in Technology Service Firms: The Effect of External and Internal Contingencies
    Das, Sidhartha R.
    Joshi, Maheshkumar P.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2012, 59 (03) : 401 - 414
  • [43] Managing external knowledge flows: The moderating role of absorptive capacity
    Escribano, Alvaro
    Fosfuri, Andrea
    Tribo, Josep A.
    RESEARCH POLICY, 2009, 38 (01) : 96 - 105
  • [44] The nexus between innovativeness and knowledge management: A focus on firm performance in the hospitality sector
    Urban, Boris
    Matela, Lekhooa
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION STUDIES, 2022, 6 (01) : 26 - 34
  • [45] Exploring and exploiting external knowledge: The effect of sector and firm technological intensity
    Segarra-Cipres, Mercedes
    Carlos Bou-Llusar, Juan
    Roca-Puig, Vicente
    INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT, 2012, 14 (02): : 203 - 217
  • [46] The Role of Organizational Emotional Memory on Declarative and Procedural Memory and Firm Innovativeness
    Akgun, Ali E.
    Keskin, Halit
    Byrne, John
    JOURNAL OF PRODUCT INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, 2012, 29 (03) : 432 - 451
  • [47] The role of government affiliation in explaining firm innovativeness and profitability in emerging countries: Evidence from China
    Wang, Chengqi
    Kafouros, Mario
    Yi, Jingtao
    Hong, Junjie
    Ganotakis, Panagiotis
    JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2020, 55 (03)
  • [48] Knowledge transfer profiles of public research organisations: the role of fields of knowledge specialisation
    de la Torre, Eva M.
    Ghorbankhani, Maryam
    Rossi, Federica
    Sagarra, Marti
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2021, 48 (06) : 860 - 876
  • [49] Knowledge management and innovativeness The role of organizational climate and structure
    Chen, Chung-Jen
    Huang, Jing-Wen
    Hsiao, Yung-Chang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANPOWER, 2010, 31 (08) : 848 - 870
  • [50] The role of existing knowledge in new product innovativeness and performance
    Brockman, BK
    Morgan, RM
    DECISION SCIENCES, 2003, 34 (02) : 385 - 419