Environmental policy and audit pricing

被引:2
作者
Rabarison, Monika K. [1 ]
Siraj, Ibrahim [2 ]
Wang, Bin [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Rio Grande Valley, Robert C Vackar Coll Business & Entrepreneurship, Dept Econ & Finance, Edinburg, TX USA
[2] Long Isl Univ Post, Sch Management, Greenvale, NY USA
[3] Marquette Univ, Coll Business Adm, Milwaukee, WI USA
[4] Marquette Univ, Coll Business Adm, Milwaukee, WI 53217 USA
关键词
audit pricing; environment risk; environmental policy stringency; government policy and regulation; LITIGATION RISK; INVESTOR PROTECTION; BUSINESS RISK; CORPORATE; FEES; GREEN; COST; FIRM; REGULATIONS; SERVICES;
D O I
10.1111/jbfa.12799
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper examines the effect of environmental policy stringency (EPS) on audit pricing. By exploiting the exogenous variation in environmental policies across 26 countries, we find that firms in countries with more stringent environmental policies incur lower audit fees. The inverse association is more pronounced in common law countries, in countries with a higher level of public enforcement of regulations and in countries with more investor protection. The lower audit fees are also more prominent for firms that are followed by more analysts and firms that have a greater institutional ownership. Furthermore, we find that firms in countries with strong regulations are better and more innovative at managing environmental risk, which implies that better environmental performance of the firms following stronger regulations could lower business risks and thus decrease audit fees. Overall, our findings suggest that compliant firms benefit from EPS.
引用
收藏
页码:2820 / 2847
页数:28
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
Alexander D., 2001, Miller International Accounting Standards Guide
[2]   Does It Pay to Be Green? A Systematic Overview [J].
Ambec, Stefan ;
Lanoie, Paul .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2008, 23 (04) :45-62
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1987, REPORT WORLD COMMISS, DOI [10.1080/07488008808408783, DOI 10.1080/07488008808408783]
[4]   Design-based analysis in Difference-In-Differences settings with staggered adoption [J].
Athey, Susan ;
Imbens, Guido W. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2022, 226 (01) :62-79
[5]   How much should we trust staggered difference-in-differences estimates? * [J].
Baker, Andrew C. ;
Larcker, David F. ;
Wang, Charles C. Y. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMICS, 2022, 144 (02) :370-395
[6]   International accounting standards and accounting quality [J].
Barth, Mary E. ;
Landsman, Wayne R. ;
Lang, Mark H. .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2008, 46 (03) :467-498
[7]   Auditors' perceived business risk and audit fees: Analysis and evidence [J].
Bell, TB ;
Landsman, WR ;
Shackelford, DA .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2001, 39 (01) :35-43
[8]   Individual and Corporate Social Responsibility [J].
Benabou, Roland ;
Tirole, Jean .
ECONOMICA, 2010, 77 (305) :1-19
[9]   Business Strategy, Financial Reporting Irregularities, and Audit Effort [J].
Bentley, Kathleen A. ;
Omer, Thomas C. ;
Sharp, Nathan Y. .
CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2013, 30 (02) :780-817
[10]   ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE AND EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION: AN INTEGRATED AGENCY-INSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVE [J].
Berrone, Pascual ;
Gomez-Mejia, Luis R. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2009, 52 (01) :103-126