Resampling reduces bias amplification in experimental social networks

被引:1
作者
Hardy, Mathew D. [1 ]
Thompson, Bill D. [2 ]
Krafft, P. M. [3 ]
Griffiths, Thomas L. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Dept Psychol, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Psychol, Berkeley, CA USA
[3] Univ Arts London, Creat Comp Inst, London, England
[4] Princeton Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Princeton, NJ USA
关键词
FACT-CHECKING; NEWS; INFORMATION; MEDIA; DIFFUSION; EVOLUTION; DYNAMICS; PARADOX; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1038/s41562-023-01715-5
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Large-scale social networks are thought to contribute to polarization by amplifying people's biases. However, the complexity of these technologies makes it difficult to identify the mechanisms responsible and evaluate mitigation strategies. Here we show under controlled laboratory conditions that transmission through social networks amplifies motivational biases on a simple artificial decision-making task. Participants in a large behavioural experiment showed increased rates of biased decision-making when part of a social network relative to asocial participants in 40 independently evolving populations. Drawing on ideas from Bayesian statistics, we identify a simple adjustment to content-selection algorithms that is predicted to mitigate bias amplification by generating samples of perspectives from within an individual's network that are more representative of the wider population. In two large experiments, this strategy was effective at reducing bias amplification while maintaining the benefits of information sharing. Simulations show that this algorithm can also be effective in more complex networks. Hardy and co-authors present a resampling strategy in social networks that is effective at reducing bias amplification while maintaining the benefits of information sharing.
引用
收藏
页码:2084 / 2098
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Multi-agent Model for Polarization Under Confirmation Bias in Social Networks
    Alvim, Mario S.
    Amorim, Bernardo
    Knight, Sophia
    Quintero, Santiago
    Valencia, Frank
    FORMAL TECHNIQUES FOR DISTRIBUTED OBJECTS, COMPONENTS, AND SYSTEMS, FORTE 2021, 2021, 12719 : 22 - 41
  • [32] Tax compliance and social desirability bias of taxpayers: experimental evidence from Indonesia
    Iraman, Endra
    Ono, Yoshikuni
    Kakinaka, Makoto
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC POLICY, 2022, 42 (01) : 92 - 109
  • [33] Knowledge through social networks: Accuracy, error, and polarisation
    Hahn, Ulrike
    Merdes, Christoph
    von Sydow, Momme
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (01):
  • [34] Animal social networks as substrate for cultural behavioural diversity
    Whitehead, Hal
    Lusseau, David
    JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2012, 294 : 19 - 28
  • [35] Reconsidering evidence of moral contagion in online social networks
    Burton, Jason W.
    Cruz, Nicole
    Hahn, Ulrike
    NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR, 2021, 5 (12) : 1629 - +
  • [36] Reputation Effects in Social Networks Do Not Promote Cooperation: An Experimental Test of the Raub & Weesie Model
    Corten, Rense
    Rosenkranz, Stephanie
    Buskens, Vincent
    Cook, Karen S.
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (07):
  • [37] Social Networks and Migration
    Munshi, Kaivan
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS, VOL 12, 2020, 12 : 503 - 524
  • [38] Social influence and interaction bias can drive emergent behavioural specialization and modular social networks across systems
    Tokita, Christopher K.
    Tarnita, Corina E.
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY INTERFACE, 2020, 17 (162)
  • [39] Neural Networks Regularization With Graph-Based Local Resampling
    Assis, Alex D.
    Torres, Luiz C. B.
    Araujo, Lourencro R. G.
    Hanriot, Vitor M.
    Braga, Antonio P.
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 50727 - 50737
  • [40] The Influence of Changing Marginals on Measures of Inequality in Scholarly Citations: Evidence of Bias and a Resampling Correction
    Kim, Lanu
    Adolph, Christopher
    West, Jevin D.
    Stovel, Katherine
    SOCIOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2020, 7 : 314 - 341