The Presence of Implicit Gender Bias in Colon and Rectal Surgery Residency Letters of Recommendation

BACKGROUND: Selection for colorectal surgery residency relies on letters of recommendation for assessment of candidates' strengths and weaknesses. It is unclear whether this process incorporates implicit gender bias. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the presence of gender bias in letters of recommendation for colorectal surgery residency. DESIGN: Mixed methods assessment of the characteristics described within the blinded letters of the 2019 application cycle to a single academic residency. SETTINGS: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: Blinded letters from the 2019 colorectal surgery residency application cycle. INTERVENTIONS: Characteristics of the letters were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Association of gender with the presence of descriptors within the letters. RESULTS: A total of 111 applicants, 409 letter writers, and 658 letters were analyzed. Forty-three percent of applicants were female. Female and male applicants had an equal mean number of positive (5.4 vs 5.8; p = 0.10) and negative (0.5 vs 0.4; p = 0.07) attributes represented. Female applicants were more likely to be described as having poor academic skills (6.0 vs 3.4%; p = 0.04) and possessing negative leadership qualities (5.2% vs 1.4%; p < 0.01) than male applicants. Male applicants were more likely to be described as kind (36.6% vs 28.3%; p = 0.03), curious ( 16.4% vs 9.2%; p = 0.01), possessing positive academic skills (33.7% vs 20.0%; p < 0.01), and possessing positive teaching skills (23.5% vs 17.0%; p = 0.04). LIMITATIONS: This study analyzed a single year of applications to an academic center and may not be generalizable. CONCLUSIONS: There are differences in the qualities used to describe female versus male applicants in colorectal surgery residency application letters of recommendation. Female applicants were more often described in negative academic terms and possessing negative leadership qualities. Males were more likely to be described as kind, curious, academically impressive, and possessing good teaching skills. The field may benefit from educational initiatives to reduce implicit gender bias in letters of recommendation. See