Contracts and communication among family members: Business succession from a contractual view

被引:7
作者
Schell, Sabrina [1 ,3 ]
Wolff, Sven [2 ]
Moog, Petra [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bern, Inst Org & Human Resource Management, Bern, Switzerland
[2] Univ Siegen, Chair Entrepreneurship & Family Business, Siegen, Germany
[3] Univ Bern, Inst Org & Human Resource Management, Engehaldenstr 4, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
Family firms; succession; contract theory; psychological contract; family communication theory; FIRM; ANTECEDENTS; COMMITMENT; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1080/00472778.2020.1816429
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
During family business succession, much information has to be exchanged among the family members involved, contacts have to be transferred, and expectations must be negotiated among the family members. How this exchange of information occurs remains unclear but can be a key success factor during the postsuccession period as information is critical for decision making. By conducting 14 in-depth case studies and considering institutional contract theory and family communication theory, we find that situations arise in which involved members of the entrepreneurial family have different levels of information and different expectations of one another. This study contributes to the family business succession literature through an intrafamily business succession model in which two types of contracts organize information exchange among the involved family members-(psychological implicit) family contracts and (explicit) business contracts. Both contracts serve the purpose of exchanging information in the family and business systems and aligning expectations such that the family and the family business remain capable of operating.
引用
收藏
页码:704 / 737
页数:34
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, An introduction to qualitative research, DOI DOI 10.1109/TVCG.2007.70541
[2]  
Argyris C., 1962, Understanding Organizational Behaviour
[3]   The relationship between boards and planning in family businesses [J].
Blumentritt, T .
FAMILY BUSINESS REVIEW, 2006, 19 (01) :65-72
[4]  
Cabrera-Suarez K., 2001, Family Business Review, V14, P37, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.2001.00037.X
[5]   The Development of Successors From Followers to Leaders in Small Family Firms An Exploratory Study [J].
Cater, John James, III ;
Justis, Robert T. .
FAMILY BUSINESS REVIEW, 2009, 22 (02) :109-124
[6]  
Chrisman J.J., 1998, FAM BUS REV, V11, P19, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1998.00019.X
[7]  
Chua J. H., 1999, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, V23, P19, DOI [10.1177/104225879902300402, DOI 10.1177/104225879902300402]
[8]   The psychological contract: A critical review [J].
Cullinane, Niall ;
Dundon, Tony .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2006, 8 (02) :113-129
[9]   Examining Family Firm Succession From a Social Exchange Perspective: A Multiphase, Multistakeholder Review [J].
Daspit, Joshua J. ;
Holt, Daniel T. ;
Chrisman, James J. ;
Long, Rebecca G. .
FAMILY BUSINESS REVIEW, 2016, 29 (01) :44-64
[10]  
Davis P.S., 1999, Family Business Review, V12, P311, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1741-6248.1999.00311.X