Economic Evaluation of Cataract: A Systematic Mapping Review

被引:10
|
作者
Ginel, Jose [1 ]
Burguera, Noemi [1 ]
Rocha-de-Lossada, Carlos [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Pinero, David [5 ,6 ]
Saez-Martin, Alejandro [7 ]
Fernandez, Joaquin [1 ]
机构
[1] VITHAS Almeria Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, Qvis, Almeria 04120, Spain
[2] VITHAS Malaga, Dept Ophthalmol, Malaga 29016, Spain
[3] Reg Univ, Hosp Malaga, Dept Ophthalmol, Plaza Hosp Civil S-N, Malaga 29009, Spain
[4] Univ Seville, Dept Surg Ophthalmol, Fedriani S-N, Seville 41009, Spain
[5] Univ Alicante, Dept Opt Pharmacol & Anat, Alicante, Spain
[6] Vithas Medimar Int Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol IMQO Oftalmar, Alicante, Spain
[7] Univ Almeria, Fac Econ & Business Studies, Dept Econ & Business, Ctra Sacramento S-N, Almeria 04120, Spain
关键词
Cataract; Cost-effectiveness analysis; And cost-utility analysis; COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; MULTIFOCAL INTRAOCULAR-LENS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; UTILITY ANALYSIS; CONDUCTED ALONGSIDE; UNITED-STATES; ELDERLY-WOMEN; SURGERY; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; INTERVENTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s40123-023-00678-0
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe purpose of this article was to ascertain the existing literature and find the gaps in economic evaluations of cataracts.MethodsSystematic methods were used to search and collect the published literature on economic evaluations of cataracts. A mapping review of studies published in the following bibliographical databases was performed: the National Library of Medicine (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science (WOS), and the Central of Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) database. A descriptive analysis was conducted and relevant studies were classified into different groups.ResultsAmong 984 studies screened, 56 studies were included in the mapping review. Four research questions were answered. There has been a progressive increase of publications during the last decade. The majority of the included studies were published by authors from institutions in the USA and UK. The most commonly investigated area was cataract surgery followed by intraocular lenses (IOLs). The studies were classified into different categories according to the main outcome evaluated, such as comparisons between different surgical techniques, costs of the cataract surgery, second eye cataract surgery costs, quality of life gain after cataract surgery, waiting time of cataract surgery and costs, and cataract evaluation, follow-up, and costs. In the IOL classification, the most frequently studied area was the comparison between monofocal and multifocal IOLs, followed by the comparison between toric and monofocal IOLs.ConclusionsCataract surgery is a cost-effective procedure compared with other non-ophthalmic and ophthalmic interventions and surgery waiting time is an important factor to consider because vision loss has a huge and broad-ranging impact on society. Numerous gaps and inconsistencies are found among the studies included. For this reason, there is a need for further studies according to the classification described in the mapping review.
引用
收藏
页码:789 / 807
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF ENHANCED ASTHMA MANAGEMENT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Yong, Y., V
    Shafie, A. A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A377 - A377
  • [22] A systematic review of economic evaluation in fecal microbiota transplantation
    Stalder, Thomas
    Kapel, Nathalie
    Diaz, Sophie
    Grenouillet, Frederic
    Koch, Stephane
    Limat, Samuel
    Daval, Franck
    Vuitton, Lucine
    Nerich, Virginie
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 41 (04): : 458 - 466
  • [23] Economic evaluation of strategies against coronavirus: a systematic review
    Izadi, Reyhane
    Hatam, Nahid
    Baberi, Fatemeh
    Yousefzadeh, Setareh
    Jafari, Abdosaleh
    HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [24] Economic evaluation of varicella vaccination Results of a systematic review
    Unim, Brigid
    Saulle, Rosella
    Boccalini, Sara
    Taddei, Cristina
    Ceccherini, Vega
    Boccia, Antonio
    Bonanni, Paolo
    La Torre, Giuseppe
    HUMAN VACCINES & IMMUNOTHERAPEUTICS, 2013, 9 (09) : 1932 - 1942
  • [25] Economic evaluation of wetland restoration: a systematic review of the literature
    Browne, Michelle
    Fraser, Gavin
    Snowball, Jeanette
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2018, 26 (06) : 1120 - 1126
  • [26] ECONOMIC EVALUATION STUDIES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY IN BRAZIL: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Haddad, L.
    Decimoni, T.
    Turri, A.
    Leandro, R.
    Soarez, P.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2014, 17 (07) : A368 - A368
  • [28] ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF ANTIPSYCHOTICS FOR THE TREATMENT OF SCHIZOPHRENIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Santos, A. S.
    Godoi, I. P.
    Brandao, C. M.
    Vidal, C. L.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (03) : A194 - A195
  • [29] Economic evaluation of clinical quality registries: a systematic review
    Lee, Peter
    Chin, Ken
    Liew, Danny
    Stub, Dion
    Brennan, Angela L.
    Lefkovits, Jeffrey
    Zomer, Ella
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (12):
  • [30] A systematic review of the economic evaluation of complementary and alternative medicine
    Coon, JT
    Ernst, E
    PERFUSION, 2005, 18 (06): : 202 - 214