Teaching Quality in Higher Education Agreement Between Teacher Self-Reports and Student Evaluations

被引:14
作者
Daumiller, Martin [1 ]
Janke, Stefan [2 ]
Hein, Julia [2 ]
Rinas, Raven [1 ]
Dickhaeuser, Oliver [2 ]
Dresel, Markus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Augsburg, Dept Psychol, Univ Str 10, D-86159 Augsburg, Germany
[2] Univ Mannheim, Dept Psychol, Mannheim, Germany
关键词
teaching quality; self-report; alignment; student ratings; education; RATINGS; SEEQ;
D O I
10.1027/1015-5759/a000700
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Teaching quality is a crucial factor within higher education. Research on this topic often requires assessing teaching quality as a global construct through self-reports. However, such instruments are criticized due to the lack of alignment between teacher and student reports of instructional practices. We argue that while teachers might over- or under-estimate specific dimensions of teaching quality, the aggregation of these dimensions in the form of overarching teaching quality well reflects differences in teaching quality between teachers. Accordingly, we test a ten-item measure that allows faculty to self-report their teaching quality based on the aspects distinguished in the SEEQ (Marsh, 1982, 2007). Using 15,503 student assessments of teaching quality in 889 sessions taught by 97 faculty members, we conducted Doubly Latent Multi Level Modelling while considering bias and unfairness variables to model overarching teaching quality assessed by students, and simultaneously corrected for measurement error and potential distortions through the assessment situation. This global factor of teaching quality was strongly associated with teacher self-reported teaching quality (p = .74), which we interpret as evidence that global teacher reports of teaching quality can serve as sensible indicators of overarching teaching quality for nomothetic research in higher education.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 181
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] The dimensionality of student ratings of teaching: integration of uni- and multidimensional models
    Apodaca, P
    Grad, H
    [J]. STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2005, 30 (06) : 723 - 748
  • [2] Further evidence supporting the validity of both a multidimensional profile and an overall evaluation of teaching effectiveness
    Burdsal, Charles A.
    Harrison, Paul D.
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2008, 33 (05) : 567 - 576
  • [3] Chan HL, 2021, CHAM, DOI [10.1007/s11356-017-9185-0, DOI 10.1007/S11705-021-2085-3, 10.1007/978-3-030-51288-0, DOI 10.1007/978-3-030-51288-0]
  • [4] Clausen M., 2002, Unterrichtsqualitat: Eine Frage der Perspektive. Empirische Analysen zur Ubereinstimmung
  • [5] Daumiller M., 2021, DATA MAT TEACHING QU
  • [6] SEEQ-DE: Konstruktion und uberprufung einer deutschsprachigen Adaption des Instruments "Student Evaluation of Educational Quality" (SEEQ; Marsh, 1982, 2007)
    Daumiller, Martin
    Grassinge, Robert
    Engelschalk, Tobias
    Dresel, Markus
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICA, 2021, 67 (04): : 176 - 188
  • [7] Construction and validation of a short multidisciplinary research performance questionnaire (SMRPQ)
    Daumiller, Martin
    Siegel, Stefan
    Dresel, Markus
    [J]. RESEARCH EVALUATION, 2019, 28 (03) : 241 - 252
  • [8] University Instructors' Achievement Goals for Teaching
    Daumiller, Martin
    Dickhaeuser, Oliver
    Dresel, Markus
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 111 (01) : 131 - 148
  • [9] Survey Measures of Classroom Instruction Comparing Student and Teacher Reports
    Desimone, Laura M.
    Smith, Thomas M.
    Frisvold, David E.
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL POLICY, 2010, 24 (02) : 267 - 329
  • [10] Fauth B., 2020, Zeitschrift Fur Padagogik, V66, P138, DOI DOI 10.3262/ZPB2001138