Integrating Computational Thinking Into Scaffolding Learning: An Innovative Approach to Enhance Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Hands-On Learning

被引:15
作者
Lee, Hsin-Yu [1 ]
Wu, Ting-Ting [2 ]
Lin, Chia-Ju [1 ]
Wang, Wei-Sheng [1 ]
Huang, Yueh-Min [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Engn Sci, Tainan, Taiwan
[2] Natl Yunlin Univ Sci & Technol, Grad Sch Technol & Vocat Educ, Touliu, Taiwan
[3] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Engn Sci, 1 Univ Rd, Tainan 701, Taiwan
关键词
science; technology; engineering; and mathematics hands-on learning; scaffolding learning; computational thinking; higher-order thinking skills; hands-on abilities; engagement; higher education; HIGHER-ORDER THINKING; STEM ENGAGEMENT; SELF-REGULATION; STUDENTS; EDUCATION; STRATEGIES; MOTIVATION;
D O I
10.1177/07356331231211916
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education is essential for developing future-ready learners in both secondary and higher education levels. However, as students transition to higher education, many encounter challenges with independent learning and research. This can negatively impact their Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS), engagement, and practical expertise. This study introduces a solution: Computational Thinking Scaffolding (CTS) in the Jupyter Notebook environment, designed to enhance STEM education at the tertiary level. CTS incorporates five phases: Decomposition, Pattern Recognition, Abstraction, Algorithm Design, and Evaluation. Utilizing a quasi-experimental method, we assessed the impact of CTS on the HOTS, engagement, and practical skills of undergraduate and postgraduate students. Our findings hold substantial relevance for university educators, academic advisors, and curriculum designers aiming to enhance students' HOTS and hands-on capabilities in STEM disciplines. The results validate the effectiveness of CTS in elevating tertiary STEM learning outcomes, and they spotlight the adaptability of the Jupyter Notebook as a valuable tool in higher education. In conclusion, our research underscores the merits of CTS for improving outcomes in higher STEM education and sets a benchmark for future endeavors in this domain.
引用
收藏
页码:431 / 467
页数:37
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   Instructional design of scaffolded online learning modules for self-directed and inquiry-based learning environments [J].
Al Mamun, Md Abdullah ;
Lawrie, Gwendolyn ;
Wright, Tony .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2020, 144
[2]   EFFECT OF SCAFFOLDING STRATEGIES ON HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS IN SCIENCE CLASSROOM [J].
Alrawili, Khaled Saleh ;
Osman, Kamisah ;
Almuntasheri, Saeed .
JOURNAL OF BALTIC SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2020, 19 (05) :718-729
[3]   A more reflective form of joint problem solving [J].
Alterman, Richard ;
Harsch, Kendall .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING, 2017, 12 (01) :9-33
[4]   A Call for Computational Thinking in Undergraduate Psychology [J].
Anderson, Nicole D. .
PSYCHOLOGY LEARNING AND TEACHING-PLAT, 2016, 15 (03) :226-234
[5]  
Baharin N., 2018, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, V8, P810, DOI [10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i7/4421, DOI 10.6007/IJARBSS/V8-I7/4421]
[6]   Introducing a fifth pedagogy: experience-based strategies for facilitating learning in natural environments [J].
Ballantyne, Roy ;
Packer, Jan .
ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2009, 15 (02) :243-262
[7]   Perceived supports and evidence-based teaching in college STEM [J].
Bathgate, Meghan E. ;
Aragon, Oriana R. ;
Cavanagh, Andrew J. ;
Waterhouse, Jonathan K. ;
Frederick, Jennifer ;
Graham, Mark J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STEM EDUCATION, 2019, 6 (1)
[8]  
Berk L. E., 1995, NAEYC research into practice series: 7. Scaffolding children's learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education
[9]   Confirming the three-factor creative product analysis matrix model in an American sample [J].
Besemer, SP ;
O'Quin, K .
CREATIVITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 1999, 12 (04) :287-296
[10]   A DYNAMIC PERSPECTIVE ON AFFECT AND CREATIVITY [J].
Bledow, Ronald ;
Rosing, Kathrin ;
Frese, Michael .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 56 (02) :432-450