Network Structure among Optimism, Social Interaction, and Psychological Wellbeing during COVID-19 Lockdown: Findings from Four UK Cohort Studies

被引:0
作者
Liu, Tzu-Hsuan [1 ]
Xia, Yiwei [2 ]
Ma, Zhihao [3 ]
机构
[1] Huaqiao Univ, Sch Polit Sci & Publ Adm, Quanzhou 362021, Peoples R China
[2] Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Law, Chengdu 611130, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ, Sch Journalism & Commun, Computat Commun Collaboratory, Room 362,Zijin Bldg,163 Xianlin Rd, Nanjing 210023, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家社会科学基金;
关键词
Optimism; Social interaction; COVID-19; lockdown; Psychological well-being; Psychological network analysis; HEALTH-CARE WORKERS; MENTAL-HEALTH; ANXIETY; POPULATION; DEPRESSION; SCALE; LIFE; VALIDITY; EMOTION; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1007/s11482-023-10206-8
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Though prior studies have found that optimism and social interactions are negatively associated with psychological distress during the COVID-19 situation, they have not considered the possibility of changes in internal linkages between these variables under different situations, across multiple cohorts. This study aims to explore how psychological resources and coping measures related to social interaction influence psychological wellbeing in various environmental contexts across distinct cohorts.The study conducted descriptive and psychological network analysis on data from four UK population studies: National Child Development Study (NCDS), 1970 British Cohort Study (BCS70), Next Steps (NS), and Millennium Cohort Study (MCS) at September-October 2020 and February-March 2021 waves of the pandemic.The findings demonstrated that younger participants (MCS cohort) were the most vulnerable while the aging people (NCDS cohort) were the most resilient population despite the severity of the pandemic. Optimism played a key role in buffering psychological wellbeing across all cohorts during the pandemic. The association of coping measures with social interaction and psychological wellbeing changed as lockdown and gathering policies changed. Finally, not all social-interaction-related coping measures were equally useful for every cohort. This study elucidates the role of psychological and social resources in psychological wellbeing during the pandemic, which shed light on practical implications and future research.
引用
收藏
页码:2769 / 2794
页数:26
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Coronavirus Stress, Optimism-Pessimism, Psychological Inflexibility, and Psychological Health: Psychometric Properties of the Coronavirus Stress Measure [J].
Arslan, Gokmen ;
Yildirim, Murat ;
Tanhan, Ahmet ;
Bulus, Metin ;
Allen, Kelly-Ann .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH AND ADDICTION, 2021, 19 (06) :2423-2439
[2]  
Baker C., 2022, CORONAVIRUS HIST ENG
[3]   Network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science [J].
Borsboom, Denny ;
Deserno, Marie K. ;
Rhemtulla, Mijke ;
Epskamp, Sacha ;
Fried, Eiko, I ;
McNally, Richard J. ;
Robinaugh, Donald J. ;
Perugini, Marco ;
Dalege, Jonas ;
Costantini, Giulio ;
Isvoranu, Adela-Maria ;
Wysocki, Anna C. ;
van Borkulo, Claudia D. ;
van Bork, Riet ;
Waldorp, Lourens J. .
NATURE REVIEWS METHODS PRIMERS, 2021, 1 (01)
[4]   Network analysis of Contingencies of Self-Worth Scale in 680 university students [J].
Briganti, Giovanni ;
Fried, Eiko I. ;
Linkowski, Paul .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2019, 272 :252-257
[5]  
Brooks Samantha K, 2020, Lancet, V395, P912, DOI [10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8, 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8.]
[6]  
Calderwood L, 2016, Open Health Data, V4, DOI DOI 10.5334/OHD.16
[7]  
Carstensen L. L., 2020, AGE ADVANTAGES EMOTI, DOI [10.31124/advance.13022042.v1, DOI 10.31124/ADVANCE.13022042.V1]
[8]   Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life [J].
Carstensen, LL ;
Fung, HH ;
Charles, ST .
MOTIVATION AND EMOTION, 2003, 27 (02) :103-123
[9]   At the intersection of emotion and cognition - Aging and the positivity effect [J].
Carstensen, LL ;
Mikels, JA .
CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 14 (03) :117-121
[10]   Optimism [J].
Carver, Charles S. ;
Scheier, Michael F. ;
Segerstrom, Suzanne C. .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2010, 30 (07) :879-889