Femoral offset restoration affects the early outcome of revision in patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures of Vancouver B2-a single-center retrospective cohort study

被引:2
作者
Sun, Lei [1 ]
Song, Wenjing [1 ]
Zhang, Zhongyuan [1 ]
Xu, Ziyao [1 ]
Sun, Mengshuai [1 ]
Gao, Guangling [1 ]
Jiang, Hongjiang [1 ]
Ju, Changjun [1 ]
机构
[1] Wendeng Orthopaed Hosp Shandong Prov, Dept Orthopaed, Weihai 264400, Peoples R China
关键词
Femoral offset; Periprosthetic femoral fractures; Revision; Tapered fluted modular titanium stem; TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; ABDUCTOR MUSCLE STRENGTH; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; STEM; DISLOCATION; COMPONENT; FIXATION; LENGTH; FEMUR;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-023-06694-2
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundFemoral offset (FO) restoration plays an important role in improving the prognosis and quality of life of patients undergoing hip replacement. However, it is not given enough attention in revisions among patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFFs); instead, more attention is given to reduction, fixation of fractures and stabilizing prostheses. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of FO restoration on the function of the hip joint in revisions of patients with PPFF of Vancouver B2. Moreover, we studied whether there is a difference in FO restoration between modular and nonmodular stems.MethodsA retrospective review of 20 patients with PPFF of Vancouver B2 revised with a tapered fluted modular titanium stem and 22 patients with PPFF of Vancouver B2 revised with a tapered fluted nonmodular titanium stem from 2016 to 2021 was conducted. Based on the difference between the FO of the affected side and that of the healthy side, 26 patients were allocated into Group A (difference & LE; 4 mm), and 16 patients were allocated into Group B (difference > 4 mm). The postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS), range of motion of the hip joint, length of both lower limbs and dislocation were compared between Group A and Group B. The proportions of patients with FO restoration (difference & LE; 4 mm) and stem subsidence were compared between the modular and nonmodular groups.ResultsThe mean follow-up time was 34.3 & PLUSMN; 17.3 months, and all cases achieved fracture healing at the last visit. Patients in Group A had a higher HHS, larger range of abduction, fewer dislocations and less limb length discrepancy (LLD). Patients in the modular group had a higher proportion of FO restoration and less subsidence.ConclusionFO restoration improves postoperative hip joint function and reduces dislocation and LLD in revisions of patients with PPFF of Vancouver B2. Compared with nonmodular prostheses, modular prostheses tend to be easier for FO restoration under complex circumstances.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[21]   Management of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures Treated With Distal Fixation Using a Modular Femoral Stem Using an Anterolateral Approach [J].
Park, Myung-Sik ;
Lim, Yung-Jin ;
Chung, Woo-Chul ;
Ham, Dong-Hun ;
Lee, Sang-Hong .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2009, 24 (08) :1270-1276
[22]   Revision total hip arthroplasty using a fluted and tapered modular distal fixation stem with and without extended trochanteric osteotomy [J].
Park, Youn-Soo ;
Moon, Young-Wan ;
Lim, Seung-Jae .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2007, 22 (07) :993-999
[23]   Risk Factors for Subsidence of Modular Fluted Tapered Stems Used During Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Hip Fractures [J].
Parry, Joshua A. ;
Hernandez, Nicolas M. ;
Berry, Daniel J. ;
Abdel, Matthew P. ;
Yuan, Brandon J. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (09) :2967-2970
[24]   Reproducible fixation with a tapered, fluted, modular, titanium stem in revision hip arthroplasty at 8-15 years follow-up [J].
Rodriguez, Jose A. ;
Deshmukh, Ajit J. ;
Robinson, Jonathan ;
Cornell, Charles N. ;
Rasquinha, Vijay J. ;
Ranawat, Amar S. ;
Ranawat, Chitranjan S. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (09) :214-218
[25]   Effect of changes of femoral offset on abductor and joint reaction forces in total hip arthroplasty [J].
Rudiger, Hannes A. ;
Guillemin, Maika ;
Latypova, Adeliya ;
Terrier, Alexandre .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2017, 137 (11) :1579-1585
[26]  
Sakalkale DP, 2001, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P125
[27]   Effect of femoral offset and limb length discrepancy on hip joint muscle strength and gait trajectory after total hip arthroplasty [J].
Sato, Hironobu ;
Maezawa, Katsuhiko ;
Gomi, Motoshi ;
Kajihara, Hajime ;
Hayashi, Akito ;
Maruyama, Yuichiro ;
Nozawa, Masahiko ;
Kaneko, Kazuo .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2020, 77 :276-282
[28]   Hominin Hip Biomechanics: Changing Perspectives [J].
Warrener, Anna G. .
ANATOMICAL RECORD-ADVANCES IN INTEGRATIVE ANATOMY AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY, 2017, 300 (05) :932-945
[29]   Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up of a Cementless, Modular, Tapered Stem in Hip Revision Arthroplasty [J].
Weiss, Rudiger J. ;
Beckman, Mats O. ;
Enocson, Anders ;
Schmalholz, Anders ;
Stark, Andre .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (01) :16-23
[30]   Arthroplasty of the hip - Leg length is not important [J].
White, TO ;
Dougall, TW .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2002, 84B (03) :335-338