Perceptions of co-design, co-development and co-delivery (Co-3D) as part of the co-production process-Insights for climate services

被引:20
作者
Fleming, A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,9 ]
Bohensky, E. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Dutra, L. X. C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Lin, B. B. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Melbourne-Thomas, J. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,9 ]
Moore, T. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Stone-Jovicich, S. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Tozer, C. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Clarke, J. M. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Donegan, L. [11 ]
Hopkins, M. [7 ]
Merson, S. [6 ]
Remenyi, T. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Swirepik, A. [8 ]
Vertigan, C. [10 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO, Environm, Hobart 7005, Australia
[2] CSIRO, Environm, Brisbane 4000, Australia
[3] CSIRO, Environm, Aspendale 3195, Australia
[4] CSIRO, Environm, Townsville 4814, Australia
[5] Univ Tasmania, Hobart 7005, Australia
[6] Pk Australia, Canberra 2601, Australia
[7] Univ Southern Queensland, Ctr Appl Climate Sci, Toowoomba, Qld, Australia
[8] Dept Climate Change Energy Environm & Water, Canberra, Australia
[9] Univ Tasmania, Ctr Marine Socioecol, Hobart 7005, Australia
[10] Port Arthur Hist Site Management Author, Port Arthur 7182, Australia
[11] Fremantle Prison, Fremantle, WA 6160, Australia
关键词
Co; -design; -production; Collaboration; Australia; Case study; Participatory research; KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE; PRINCIPLES; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.cliser.2023.100364
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Co-design, co-development, and co-delivery (Co-3D for short) are activities within the co-production research pathway that are increasingly being used in climate change science and adaptation projects. However, the research community is still coming to understand how best to incorporate Co-3D in practice, as each project has a specific context around stakeholder relationships, governance arrangements, and capacity to actively participate. This paper outlines five case studies from Australia as examples of different projects engaging with Co-3D in different ways in order to explore how Co-3D is being used and might be improved. Crucially, we include the perceptions and experiences of researchers, funders and end users, as well as our own critical reflections. Each of the projects self-describes as using 'co-production', but the extent and format varies widely with different combinations of co-design, co-development and/or co-delivery used in each. Our findings show that without clear understanding of Co-3D within the co-production process, aspects of Co-3D may not be properly considered in planning or implementation. Co-3D activities are not completely distinct, rather they form a continuum of engagement and integration across phases of project work. Thus, the specific definitions and delineations between these terms may not be required for them to be applied. However, practical and explicit negotiation of what 'co-production' means in different project contexts is needed so that all parties understand their roles and responsibilities. Further, more evaluations of outcomes and stakeholder experiences are required. We provide seven principles of Co-3D that should be considered when embarking on co-production projects.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Andre K., 2020, CO DESIGNING CLIMATE
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, Socioeco. Prac. Res, DOI DOI 10.1007/S42532-019-00018-2
  • [3] Bammer G, 2013, DISCIPLINING INTERDISCIPLINARITY: INTEGRATION AND IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCES FOR RESEARCHING COMPLEX REAL-WORLD PROBLEMS, P1
  • [4] Beck S, GENET SOC, P113
  • [5] A How-to Guide for Coproduction of Actionable Science
    Beier, Paul
    Hansen, Lara J.
    Helbrecht, Lynn
    Behar, David
    [J]. CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2017, 10 (03): : 288 - 296
  • [6] Engagement, involvement and empowerment: Three realms of a coproduction framework for climate services
    Bojovic, Dragana
    St Clair, Asuncion Lera
    Christel, Isadora
    Terrado, Marta
    Stanzel, Philipp
    Gonzalez, Paula
    Palin, Erika J.
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2021, 68
  • [7] Toward a multi-faceted conception of co-production of climate services
    Bremer, Scott
    Wardekker, Arjan
    Dessai, Suraje
    Sobolowski, Stefan
    Slaattelid, Rasmus
    van der Sluijs, Jeroen
    [J]. CLIMATE SERVICES, 2019, 13 : 42 - 50
  • [8] Co-production in climate change research: reviewing different perspectives
    Bremer, Scott
    Meisch, Simon
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2017, 8 (06)
  • [9] Adapting scenarios for climate adaptation: Practitioners' perspectives on a popular planning method
    Butler, James R. A.
    Bergseng, Anne Marte
    Bohensky, Erin
    Pedde, Simona
    Aitkenhead, Matt
    Hamden, Rohan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2020, 104 : 13 - 19
  • [10] Carter S., Co-production in the development of weather and climate services, VThird