Effectiveness and safety of ventriculoperitoneal shunt versus lumboperitoneal shunt for communicating hydrocephalus: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

被引:16
作者
Ho, Yi-Jen [1 ]
Chiang, Wen-Chun [2 ]
Huang, Hsin-Yi [3 ]
Lin, Shinn-Zong [1 ,4 ]
Tsai, Sheng-Tzung [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Hualien Tzu Chi Hosp, Buddhist Tzu Chi Med Fdn, Dept Neurosurg, Hualien, Taiwan
[2] Hualien Tzu Chi Hosp, Buddhist Tzu Chi Med Fdn, Dept Chest Med, Hualien, Taiwan
[3] Hualien Tzu Chi Hosp, Buddhist Tzu Chi Med Fdn, Dept Med Res, Hualien, Taiwan
[4] Tzu Chi Univ, Sch Med, Hualien, Taiwan
[5] Hualien Tzu Chi Hosp, Buddhist Tzu Chi Med Fdn, Dept Neurosurg, 707 Sec 3 Zhongyang Rd, Hualien 970473, Taiwan
关键词
communicating hydrocephalus; lumboperitoneal shunt; meta-analysis; ventriculoperitoneal shunt; NORMAL-PRESSURE HYDROCEPHALUS; COMPLICATIONS; MANAGEMENT; ESTIMATORS; PERITONEAL; VARIANCE; EFFICACY; BIAS;
D O I
10.1111/cns.14086
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
IntroductionThe current standard surgical treatment for cerebrospinal fluid diversion is a ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) implantation. Lumboperitoneal shunts (LPS) are an alternative treatment for communicating hydrocephalus. Prior studies comparing these two included a limited number of participants. MethodsWe performed a meta-analysis determined the treatment failure, complications and effectiveness of lumboperitoneal shunt for communicating hydrocephalus. We reviewed studies with clinical and imaging diagnoses of communicating hydrocephalus, all causes and subtypes of communicating hydrocephalus, and studies that analyzed the primary and secondary outcomes listed below. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-RCTs and retrospective studies. We performed the meta-analysis in R, using a random-effects model and reporting 95% confidence intervals. ResultsData from 25 studies, including 3654 patients, were analyzed. The total complication rates were 12.98% (188/1448) for lumboperitoneal shunt and 23.80% (398/1672) for ventriculoperitoneal shunt. The odds ratio for lumboperitoneal shunt versus ventriculoperitoneal shunt complication rates was 0.29 (95% CI 0.19 to 0.45, p < 0.0001), and the I-2 was 72%. The shunt obstruction/malfunction rate was 3.99% (48/1204) for lumboperitoneal shunt and 8.31% (115/1384) for ventriculoperitoneal shunt (Odds ratio 0.54, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.79, p = 0.002, I-2 = 0%). Based on the Modified Rankin Scale score, there were no differences in effectiveness between lumboperitoneal shunt and ventriculoperitoneal shunt. Nevertheless, lumboperitoneal shunt improved radiological outcomes. ConclusionsThis analysis demonstrated that lumboperitoneal shunt is a safe and equally effective choice for treating communicating hydrocephalus. More studies are needed to confirm the safety of lumboperitoneal shunt.
引用
收藏
页码:804 / 815
页数:12
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] LUMBOPERITONEAL SHUNT - CLINICAL-APPLICATIONS, COMPLICATIONS, AND COMPARISON WITH VENTRICULOPERITONEAL SHUNT
    AOKI, N
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 1990, 26 (06) : 998 - 1004
  • [2] Efficacy of Lumboperitoneal Shunting in Patients with Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
    Bayar, Mehmet Akif
    Tekiner, Ayhan
    Celik, Haydar
    Yilmaz, Ali
    Menekse, Guner
    Yildirim, Timur
    Alagoz, Fatih
    Guvenc, Yahya
    Erdem, Yavuz
    [J]. TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 28 (01) : 62 - 66
  • [3] Surgical management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus
    Bergsneider, M
    Black, PM
    Klinge, P
    Marmarou, A
    Relkin, N
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2005, 57 (03) : 29 - 39
  • [4] Lumboperitoneal shunts for the treatment of normal pressure hydrocephalus
    Bloch, Orin
    McDermott, Michael W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 19 (08) : 1107 - 1111
  • [5] Chen X., 2019, J CLIN SURG-APPL PHY, V27, P45, DOI [10.3969/j.issn.1005-6483.2019.01.013, DOI 10.3969/J.ISSN.1005-6483.2019.01.013]
  • [6] METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS
    DERSIMONIAN, R
    LAIRD, N
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03): : 177 - 188
  • [7] Ding HT., 2014, CONT MED FORUM, V12, P211
  • [8] Dong, 2015, COMP CLIN CLIN EFFEC
  • [9] Current epidemiology of cerebrospinal fluid shunt surgery in the UK and Ireland (2004-2013)
    Fernandez-Mendez, Rocio
    Richards, Hugh K.
    Seeley, Helen M.
    Pickard, John D.
    Joannides, Alexis J.
    Allcutt, David
    Arnold, Fiona
    Ashpole, Richard
    Ballantyne, Eric
    Bleil, Cristina
    Brydon, Howard
    Bulters, Diederik
    Byrne, Marian
    Cadoux-Hudson, Tom
    Cairns, Claire
    Cameron, Kerry
    Cartmill, Maria
    Chandler, Christopher
    Choksey, Munchi S.
    Collins, Sally-Ann
    Colthrust, Kimona
    Craven, Claudia
    Crimmins, Darach
    Critchley, Giles
    Crocker, Matthew
    Cudlip, Simon
    Czosnyka, Marek
    Czosnyka, Zofia
    D'Antona, Linda
    Dewhurst, Emma
    Dunn, Laurence
    Edwards, Richard
    Evans, Fiona
    Fernandes, Helen
    Fieldsend, Amy
    Flint, Graham
    Garnett, Matthew
    Golash, Aprajay
    Goodden, John
    Gourley, Lois
    Hallet, Jennifer
    Hardy, Jan
    Hennigan, Dawn
    Herbert, Katie
    Hinde, Liz
    Holliman, Damian
    Hutchinson, Peter
    Jenkinson, Michael
    Kamaly, Ian
    Kandasamy, Jothy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 90 (07) : 747 - 754
  • [10] A new improved graphical and quantitative method for detecting bias in meta-analysis
    Furuya-Kanamori, Luis
    Barendregt, Jan J.
    Doi, Suhail A. R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2018, 16 (04) : 195 - 203