Computational Thinking to Learn Environmental Sustainability: A Learning Progression

被引:8
作者
Christensen, Dana [1 ]
机构
[1] Stockton Univ, Nat & Math Sci Dept, 101 Vera King Farris Dr, Galloway, NJ 08240 USA
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Environmental education; Sustainability; Computational thinking; Learning progression; Interdisciplinary; SCIENCE; EDUCATION; KNOWLEDGE; PERCEPTION; LITERACY; EMOTIONS; CHILDREN; LESSONS; PILLAR;
D O I
10.1007/s10956-022-10004-1
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Current environmental problems are the primary focus for environmental science students and researchers. Sustainable environmental solutions require interdisciplinary thought processes, which pose difficulty to both students and the public. Computational thinking is an emerging term emphasized by progressive science curricula. Computational thinking and environmental science are both interdisciplinary by nature. Learning about sustainable environmental solutions requires students to partake in computational thinking. These ideas lend toward an expansive learning progression that encourages scaffolded and differentiated student progress in both computational knowledge and environmental knowledge. The learning progression, which emerges from the conceptual framework, emphasizes the spheres of sustainability, research, education, and economic perspectives to support environmental science learning through computational thinking. Computational thinking emphasized by the computational components (input, integration, output, and feedback) support learning about environmental solutions within the learning progression. The learning progression promotes application and implications for educators, students, researchers, and environmental scientists.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 44
页数:19
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [1] Ozone biomonitoring: A versatile tool for science, education and regulation
    Agathokleous, Evgenios
    Saitanis, Costas J.
    Feng, Zhaozhong
    De Marco, Alessandra
    Araminiene, Valda
    Domingos, Marisa
    Sicard, Pierre
    Paoletti, Elena
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & HEALTH, 2020, 18 : 7 - 13
  • [2] Computation and Computational Thinking
    Aho, Alfred V.
    [J]. COMPUTER JOURNAL, 2012, 55 (07) : 832 - 835
  • [3] Computational thinking education: Issues and challenges
    Angeli, Charoula
    Giannakos, Michail
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2020, 105 (105)
  • [4] AP Environmental Science CED, 2021, COPYRIGHT
  • [5] AP Environmental Science Scoring Guidelines, 2006, AP ENV SCI SCOR GUID
  • [6] AP Environmental Science Scoring Guidelines, 2019, AP ENV SCI SCOR GUID
  • [7] Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority, 2020, AUSTR CURR CROSS CUR
  • [8] Australian Education for Sustainability Alliance, 2014, ED SUST AUSTR CURR P
  • [9] Barbalet J, 2002, SOC REV MON, P132
  • [10] A Learning Progression for Scientific Argumentation: Understanding Student Work and Designing Supportive Instructional Contexts
    Berland, Leema K.
    McNeill, Katherine L.
    [J]. SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2010, 94 (05) : 765 - 793