The ties that unbind: intergovernmental decision rules and the policy-opinion link

被引:0
作者
Sorace, Miriam [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kent, Sch Polit & Int Relat, Quantitat Polit, Canterbury, Kent, England
[2] London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, European Inst, European Polit, London, England
[3] Univ Kent, Rutherford Coll, Sch Polit & Int Relat, Canterbury, Kent, England
关键词
Causal inference; employment policy; European Union; political representation; public opinion; text analysis; EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT; DEMOCRATIC DEFICIT; GOVERNMENT RESPONSIVENESS; BARGAINING SUCCESS; PUBLIC-OPINION; SOCIAL-POLICY; UNION; EU; POWER; REPRESENTATION;
D O I
10.1080/13501763.2022.2086604
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Whether territorial (intergovernmental) decision rules adversely impact the policy-opinion link is a controversial topic, and unresolved in part due to a lack of empirical evidence. This study leverages the European Union's (EU) codecision reform - introduced to tackle the EU's democratic deficit - to evaluate whether it caused EU policies to better track public opinion (mood).. The analysis links an original dataset of ideologically scaled EU policies with existing datasets on European public opinion (1990-2008) and applies the difference-in-differences (DiD) causal inference design. The study finds that EU policies adopted under codecision more closely track European public opinion shifts. The finding supports the argument that territorial legislative procedures can hurt the democratic legitimacy of public policies. This has significant implications for the reform of the EU and of global governance, and contributes to the broader field of political representation and the debate on territorial representation.
引用
收藏
页码:1609 / 1632
页数:24
相关论文
共 102 条