Exploring evolving caring relationship experiences among nursing home residents and nurse aides in Shanghai: a dyadic perspective

被引:0
作者
Chen, Lin [1 ]
Zhu, Qiang [2 ]
Xu, Ling [3 ]
Lee, Yura [4 ]
Kim, Bum Jung [5 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Dept Social Work, LSE Fudan Res Ctr Global Publ Policy, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Dept Social Work, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Texas Arlington, Sch Social Work, Arlington, TX 76019 USA
[4] Univ Wisconsin, Helen Bader Sch Social Welf, Milwaukee, WI 53201 USA
[5] Chung Ang Univ, Dept Social Welf, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
caring relationship; China; nurse aide; nursing home care; qualitative research; PERSON-CENTERED CARE; QUALITY; CHALLENGES; VIEWS; STAFF; WELL; LIFE;
D O I
10.1017/S0144686X21001847
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学]; R592 [老年病学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100203 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Although research has shown that older nursing home residents can benefit from caring relationships with nurse aides, few studies have explored their dyadic, evolving relationship dynamics. Using a dyadic perspective, this study simultaneously explores caring relationships among older residents and nurse aides in Shanghai. In a government-sponsored nursing home in Shanghai, 20 matched resident-nurse aide dyads participated in semi-structured, in-depth interviews (N = 40). We performed thematic analysis to interpret and conceptualise the evolving caring relationships within dyads. Four types emerged during the evolution of caring relationships across the 20 dyads: (a) sharing strong rapport, (b) respecting each other, (c) hesitant responding, and (d) keeping emotional distance. Upon placement, all the residents kept emotional distance from nurse aides, and their assigned nurse aides provided care-giving by following nursing home regulations. As time passed, nurse aides began to create a family environment and tried to interact with residents on an emotional level; however, residents' attitudes varied. The caring relationships in some dyads evolved as rapport and respect emerged, while others remained hesitant and distant. This suggests that residents and nurse aides prioritised caring relationships differently in terms of autonomy preservation and safety protection, respectively. This study sheds light on nursing home practice to facilitate building caring relationships between residents and nurse aides.
引用
收藏
页码:2447 / 2469
页数:23
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Patient safety in nursing homes in Sweden: nurses' views on safety and their role
    Andersson, Frieda
    Hjelm, Katarina
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH & POLICY, 2017, 22 (04) : 204 - 210
  • [2] Anyan F, 2013, QUAL REP, V18
  • [3] "Make Me Feel at Ease and at Home": Differential Care Preferences of Nursing Home Residents
    Bangerter, Lauren R.
    Van Haitsma, Kimberly
    Heid, Allison R.
    Abbott, Katherine
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2016, 56 (04) : 702 - 713
  • [4] Resident-caregiver relationships and thriving among nursing home residents
    Bergland, Å
    Kirkevold, M
    [J]. RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 2005, 28 (05) : 365 - 375
  • [5] The relationship between staffing and quality in long-term care facilities: Exploring the views of nurse aides
    Bowers, BJ
    Esmond, S
    Jacobson, N
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 2000, 14 (04) : 55 - 64
  • [6] Care-as-service, care-as-relating, care-as-comfort: Understanding nursing home residents' definitions of quality
    Bowers, BJ
    Fibich, B
    Jacobson, N
    [J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2001, 41 (04) : 539 - 545
  • [7] Dementia caregiving in spousal relationships: A dyadic perspective
    Braun, Melanie
    Scholz, Urte
    Bailey, Barbara
    Perren, Sonja
    Hornung, Rainer
    Martin, Mike
    [J]. AGING & MENTAL HEALTH, 2009, 13 (03) : 426 - 436
  • [8] Chao Shu-Yuan, 2008, J Nurs Res, V16, P149
  • [9] Power and ambivalence in intergenerational communication: Deciding to institutionalize in Shanghai
    Chen, Lin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGING STUDIES, 2017, 41 : 44 - 51
  • [10] Shanghai: Front-Runner of Community-Based Eldercare in China
    Chen, Lin
    Han, Wen-Jui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGING & SOCIAL POLICY, 2016, 28 (04) : 292 - 307