Age Differences in Physiological Reactivity to Daily Emotional Experiences

被引:7
作者
Park, Yoobin [1 ]
Gordon, Amie M. M. [2 ]
Mendes, Wendy Berry [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, San Francisco, CA 94118 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychol, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
Aging; Emotions in daily life; Autonomic nervous system; Cardiovascular reactivity; AFFECT DYNAMICS; BLOOD-PRESSURE; LIFE; OLDER; TRANSPARENCY; METAANALYSIS; RESPONSES; MODEL; LESS;
D O I
10.1007/s42761-023-00207-z
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
How does physiological reactivity to emotional experiences change with age? Previous studies addressing this question have mostly been conducted in laboratory settings during which emotions are induced via pictures, films, or relived memories, raising external validity questions. In the present research, we draw upon two datasets collected using ecological momentary assessment methods (totaling 134,723 daily reports from 14,436 individuals) to examine age differences in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) reactivity to naturally occurring emotional experiences. We first examined how older and younger individuals differ in the prevalence of emotions varying in valence and arousal. On average, people reported experiencing positive emotions (high or low arousal) more than 70% of the time they were asked, and older (vs. younger) individuals tended to report positive emotions more frequently. In terms of physiological reactivity, we found that age was associated with reduced HR and BP reactivity. Some evidence was also found that the magnitude of such age differences may depend on the valence or arousal of the experienced emotion. The present findings have implications for understanding how emotions can contribute to physical health across the lifespan.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 499
页数:13
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Cuff-Less Methods for Blood PressureTelemonitoring
    Bard, Dylan M.
    Joseph, Jeffrey I.
    van Helmond, Noud
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2019, 6
  • [2] When Good Feelings Turn Mixed: Affective Dynamics and Big Five Trait Predictors of Mixed Emotions in Daily Life
    Barford, Kate A.
    Koval, Peter
    Kuppens, Peter
    Smillie, Luke D.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2020, 34 (03) : 393 - 411
  • [3] Random effects structure for testing interactions in linear mixed-effects models
    Barr, Dale J.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 4
  • [4] Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
    Bates, Douglas
    Maechler, Martin
    Bolker, Benjamin M.
    Walker, Steven C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01): : 1 - 48
  • [5] Smart wearable devices in cardiovascular care: where we are and how to move forward
    Bayoumy, Karim
    Gaber, Mohammed
    Elshafeey, Abdallah
    Mhaimeed, Omar
    Dineen, Elizabeth H.
    Marvel, Francoise A.
    Martin, Seth S.
    Muse, Evan D.
    Turakhia, Mintu P.
    Tarakji, Khaldoun G.
    Elshazly, Mohamed B.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 18 (08) : 581 - 599
  • [7] Cacioppo J.T., 1997, Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, V17, P27, DOI DOI 10.1146/ANNUREV.PSYCH.50.1.191
  • [8] Age Differences in Affective Well-Being: Context Matters
    Charles, Susan Turk
    Piazza, Jennifer R.
    [J]. SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY COMPASS, 2009, 3 (05): : 711 - 724
  • [9] Strength and Vulnerability Integration: A Model of Emotional Well-Being Across Adulthood
    Charles, Susan Turk
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 2010, 136 (06) : 1068 - 1091
  • [10] Modeling Heterogeneity in the Simultaneous Emotional Costs and Social Benefits of Co-Rumination
    DiGiovanni, Ana M.
    Vannucci, Anna
    Ohannessian, Christine McCauley
    Bolger, Niall
    [J]. EMOTION, 2021, 21 (07) : 1470 - 1482