Who cheats? Do prosocial values make a difference?

被引:4
作者
Kasler, Jonathan [1 ]
Sharabi-Nov, Adi [2 ,3 ]
Shinwell, Eric S. [3 ,4 ]
Hen, Meirav [5 ]
机构
[1] Tel Hai Coll, Dept Educ, Qiryat Shemona, Israel
[2] Tel Hai Coll, Dept Nutr Sci, Qiryat Shemona, Israel
[3] Ziv Med Ctr, Safed, Israel
[4] Bar Ilan Univ, Azrieli Fac Med, Ramat Gan, Israel
[5] Tel Hai Coll, Dept Psychol, Qiryat Shemona, Israel
关键词
Academic misconduct; Academic integrity; Motivation; Prosocial values; LEARNING QUESTIONNAIRE MSLQ; ACADEMIC DISHONESTY; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; MOTIVATED STRATEGIES; COGNITIVE-ABILITY; COLLEGE; STUDENTS; PERSONALITY; CHARACTER; STRENGTHS;
D O I
10.1007/s40979-023-00128-1
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Research has indicated the importance of internal motivation as a factor in reducing academic misconduct in higher education and some commentators have also cited prosocial values as buffers against the temptation to cheat. In light of this research, the goal of the present research was to study the roles of motivation and prosocial values in combating academic misconduct. Specifically, it examined how internal motivation and strong prosocial values might impact the risk of academic misconduct. For this purpose, 455 student participants completed a self-report questionnaire. The results support the hypothesis that high internal motivation and strong prosocial values reduce the tendency to cheat. In comparison, high external motivation and weak prosocial values were associated with higher levels of academic misconduct. In addition, male students were more likely to cheat than their female classmates and science students were more likely to cheat than social science students. The ability to identify factors that reduce the risk of academic misconduct can inform interventions in higher education. According to the present results, such interventions should involve the promotion of prosocial values and enhance student well-being.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Do proactive HR managers make a difference in HR system use during a crisis? [J].
Wunderlich, Marie Freia ;
Lokke, Ann-Kristina .
MANAGEMENT DECISION, 2024, 62 (12) :3876-3894
[22]   How do philosophers and nonphilosophers think about philosophy? And does personality make a difference? [J].
James Andow .
Synthese, 2022, 200
[24]   Do Prosocial Adolescents Perceive Less Stress in Peer Relations? An Analysis of Prosocial Behavior among Adolescents with Behavior Problems [J].
Ludeke, Soren ;
Linderkamp, Friedrich .
PSYCHOLOGIE IN ERZIEHUNG UND UNTERRICHT, 2019, 66 (04) :273-284
[25]   SENIOR PUBLIC MANAGERS' ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT: DO PRIVATE SECTOR EXPERIENCE AND TENURE MAKE A DIFFERENCE? [J].
Andrews, Rhys ;
Hansen, Jesper Rosenberg ;
Huxley, Katy .
INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, :911-942
[26]   Intellectual humility and prosocial values: Direct and mediated effects [J].
Krumrei-Mancuso, Elizabeth J. .
JOURNAL OF POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 12 (01) :13-28
[27]   Do tutors make a difference in online learning? A comparative study in two Open Online Courses [J].
Heller, Richard Frederick ;
Chilolo, Edward ;
Elliott, Jonny ;
Johnson, Brian ;
Lipman, David ;
Ononeze, Victoria ;
Richards, Justin .
OPEN PRAXIS, 2019, 11 (03) :229-241
[28]   Bullying and fear of victimization: Do supportive adults in school make a difference in adolescents' perceptions of safety? [J].
Baek, Hyunin ;
Andreescu, Viviana ;
Rolfe, Shawn M. .
JOURNAL OF SCHOOL VIOLENCE, 2019, 18 (01) :92-106
[29]   Intergenerational support and depression among Chinese older adults: do gender and widowhood make a difference? [J].
Guo, Man ;
Chi, Iris ;
Silverstein, Merril .
AGEING & SOCIETY, 2017, 37 (04) :695-724
[30]   What difference do role models make? Investigating outcomes at a residential environmental education center [J].
Stern, Marc J. ;
Frensley, B. Troy ;
Powell, Robert B. ;
Ardoin, Nicole M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2018, 24 (06) :818-830