Who cheats? Do prosocial values make a difference?

被引:3
|
作者
Kasler, Jonathan [1 ]
Sharabi-Nov, Adi [2 ,3 ]
Shinwell, Eric S. [3 ,4 ]
Hen, Meirav [5 ]
机构
[1] Tel Hai Coll, Dept Educ, Qiryat Shemona, Israel
[2] Tel Hai Coll, Dept Nutr Sci, Qiryat Shemona, Israel
[3] Ziv Med Ctr, Safed, Israel
[4] Bar Ilan Univ, Azrieli Fac Med, Ramat Gan, Israel
[5] Tel Hai Coll, Dept Psychol, Qiryat Shemona, Israel
关键词
Academic misconduct; Academic integrity; Motivation; Prosocial values; LEARNING QUESTIONNAIRE MSLQ; ACADEMIC DISHONESTY; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; MOTIVATED STRATEGIES; COGNITIVE-ABILITY; COLLEGE; STUDENTS; PERSONALITY; CHARACTER; STRENGTHS;
D O I
10.1007/s40979-023-00128-1
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Research has indicated the importance of internal motivation as a factor in reducing academic misconduct in higher education and some commentators have also cited prosocial values as buffers against the temptation to cheat. In light of this research, the goal of the present research was to study the roles of motivation and prosocial values in combating academic misconduct. Specifically, it examined how internal motivation and strong prosocial values might impact the risk of academic misconduct. For this purpose, 455 student participants completed a self-report questionnaire. The results support the hypothesis that high internal motivation and strong prosocial values reduce the tendency to cheat. In comparison, high external motivation and weak prosocial values were associated with higher levels of academic misconduct. In addition, male students were more likely to cheat than their female classmates and science students were more likely to cheat than social science students. The ability to identify factors that reduce the risk of academic misconduct can inform interventions in higher education. According to the present results, such interventions should involve the promotion of prosocial values and enhance student well-being.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Who cheats? Do prosocial values make a difference?
    Jonathan Kasler
    Adi Sharabi-Nov
    Eric S. Shinwell
    Meirav Hen
    International Journal for Educational Integrity, 19
  • [2] Teachers' agency: Do their values make a difference?
    Hadar, Linor L.
    Benish-Weisman, Maya
    BRITISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2019, 45 (01) : 137 - 160
  • [3] Competing models of librarianship: Do core values make a difference?
    Weissinger, T
    JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIANSHIP, 2003, 29 (01): : 32 - 39
  • [4] Values that make a difference
    Agee, BR
    FUTURE OF CHRISTIAN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1999, : 197 - +
  • [5] Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference
    Grant, Adam M.
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (02): : 393 - 417
  • [6] Engineers who make a difference
    Gaboury, Jane
    INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER, 2005, 37 (05): : 26 - 29
  • [7] Engineers who make a difference
    Brandt, David
    Elliott, Monica
    Hughes, Michael
    INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER, 2010, 42 (11): : 23 - 29
  • [8] Engineers who MAKE A DIFFERENCE
    Cross, Candi S.
    INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER, 2009, 41 (01): : 25 - 31
  • [9] Engineers who make a difference
    Anderson, R
    INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER, 2003, 35 (09): : 27 - 33
  • [10] 6 WHO WILL MAKE A DIFFERENCE
    KATAYAMA, FH
    FORTUNE, 1987, 115 (07) : 50 - 53