A scoping review of interventions in primary science education

被引:19
作者
Deehan, James [1 ]
MacDonald, Amy [2 ]
Morris, Christopher [1 ]
机构
[1] Charles Sturt Univ, Sch Educ, Bathurst, NSW, Australia
[2] Charles Sturt Univ, Sch Educ, Albury, NSW, Australia
关键词
Primary; elementary; science; intervention; evaluation; review; practices; pedagogy; STUDENTS LEARNING ACHIEVEMENTS; PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE; SYSTEM THINKING SKILLS; PROFESSIONAL-DEVELOPMENT; PRESERVICE TEACHERS; ELEMENTARY-SCHOOL; READING-COMPREHENSION; CONCEPTUAL CHANGE; SELF-EFFICACY; INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICES;
D O I
10.1080/03057267.2022.2154997
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Effective science education is crucial for developing a scientifically literate citizenry, and for many, foundational primary science education experiences play a significant role in defining their long-term science trajectories. However, primary science education has been limited by a dissonance between the poor science trajectories for generations of primary students and the positive findings often reported university research; a divide that teachers are primarily responsible for bridging. This paper presents a scoping review of primary science intervention literature from the past 20 years to both describe the research outputs and analyse the evidence for the effectiveness of different primary science teaching approaches. The search yielded 142 research outputs from 26 nations with data from as many as 36,021 students. The results showed an established field with robust research designs covering all science disciplines and primary school years. Effect size analyses showed that an array of student-centred interventions covaried with large to very large improvements in science content knowledge, skills and attitudes. With the effectiveness of many student-centred approaches established in primary science education, issues of feasibility and scalability should now become a central focus for all stakeholders. Limited coverage of K-2 science in the sample was a point of concern.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 43
页数:43
相关论文
共 246 条
[31]  
Banilower E.R., 2018, REPORT 2018 NSSME
[32]   Understanding the Big Picture for Science Teacher Education: The 2018 NSSME+ [J].
Banilower, Eric R. .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TEACHER EDUCATION, 2019, 30 (03) :201-208
[33]   The Learning Benefits of Being Willing and Able to Engage in Scientific Argumentation [J].
Bathgate, Meghan ;
Crowell, Amanda ;
Schunn, Christian ;
Cannady, Mac ;
Dorph, Rena .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2015, 37 (10) :1590-1612
[34]   Is Inquiry Possible in Light of Accountability?: A Quantitative Comparison of the Relative Effectiveness of Guided Inquiry and Verification Laboratory Instruction [J].
Blanchard, Margaret R. ;
Southerland, Sherry A. ;
Osborne, Jason W. ;
Sampson, Victor D. ;
Annetta, Leonard A. ;
Granger, Ellen M. .
SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2010, 94 (04) :577-616
[35]   Success in Science Learning and Preservice Science Teaching Self-Efficacy [J].
Bleicher, Robert E. ;
Lindgren, Joan .
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE TEACHER EDUCATION, 2005, 16 (03) :205-225
[36]  
Bloom B.S., 1984, Educational Researcher, V13, P4, DOI [10.3102/0013189X013006004, DOI 10.3102/0013189X013006004]
[37]  
Bloom H.S., 2008, J RES EDUC EFF, V1, P289, DOI [10.1080/19345740802400072, DOI 10.1080/19345740802400072]
[38]  
Boon HJ, 2016, AUST J TEACH EDUC, V41, DOI 10.14221/ajte.2016v41n4.3
[39]  
Boyatzis RichardE., 1998, Transforming Qualitative Information
[40]   Development of Computational Thinking Skills through Unplugged Activities in Primary School [J].
Brackmann, Christian P. ;
Roman-Gonzalez, Marcos ;
Robles, Gregorio ;
Moreno-Leon, Jesus ;
Casali, Ana ;
Barone, Dante .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH WORKSHOP IN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY COMPUTING EDUCATION (WIPSCE 2017), 2017, :65-72