Type of infertility and prevalence of congenital malformations

被引:2
作者
Basso, Olga [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shapiro, Gabriel D. [2 ,3 ]
Gagnon, Robert [2 ]
Tamblyn, Robyn [3 ,4 ]
Platt, Robert W. [2 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Hlth Ctr, Res Inst, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Dept Epidemiol Biostat & Occupat Hlth, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Dept Pediat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
assisted reproductive technologies; causes of infertility; congenital malformations; fertility treatment; infertility; ovulatory disorders; ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY; DOWN-SYNDROME; BIRTH-DEFECTS; PRENATAL-DIAGNOSIS; RISK; PREGNANCY; OUTCOMES; OBESITY; RATES; AGE;
D O I
10.1111/ppe.13012
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Children conceived with assisted reproductive technologies (ART) or after a long waiting time have a higher prevalence of congenital malformations, but few studies have examined the contribution of type of infertility.Objectives: To quantify the association between causes of infertility and prevalence of malformations.Methods: We compared the prevalence at birth of all and severe malformations diagnosed up to age 2 between 6656 children born in 1996-2017 to parents who had previously been assessed for infertility a an academic fertility clinic ("exposed") and 10,382 children born in the same period to parents with no recent medical history of infertility ("reference"). We estimated prevalence ratios (PR) and prevalence differences (PD), by infertility status, type of treatment (non-ART, ART), and infertility diagnosis, in all children and among singletons.Results: Compared with children of parents with no infertility, children of parents with infertility had a higher prevalence of malformations (both definitions), particularly following ART conceptions. After accounting for treatment, ovulatory disorders were associated with a higher prevalence of both all (PR 1.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15, 1.93; PD 3.8, 95% CI 1.0, 6.6) and severe (PR 1.53, 95% CI 1.02, 2.29; PD 1.8, 95% CI -0.2, 3.7) malformations (the estimates refer to exposed children conceived without treatment). Unexplained and male factor infertility were associated with all and severe malformations, respectively. Estimates among singletons were similar. A diagnosis of ovulatory disorders was associated with all malformations also in analyses restricted to exposed children, regardless of treatment (we did not examine severe malformations, due to limited power).Conclusions: In this study, ovulatory disorders were consistently associated with a higher prevalence of congenital malformations (including severe malformations) among live births, regardless of mode of conception.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 53
页数:11
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Congenital melanocytic nevi: Where are we now? Part I. Clinical presentation, epidemiology, pathogenesis, histology, malignant transformation, and neurocutaneous melanosis
    Alikhan, Ali
    Ibrahimi, Omar A.
    Eisen, Daniel B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2012, 67 (04) : 495.e1 - 495.e17
  • [2] The influence of regulation of medically assisted reproduction on the risk of hospitalization in the first 2 years of life
    Basso, Olga
    Shapiro, Gabriel D.
    Twardowski, Sarah E.
    Monnier, Patricia
    Buckett, William
    Tamblyn, Robyn
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37 (09) : 2143 - 2153
  • [3] Endometriosis increases the risk of obstetrical and neonatal complications
    Berlac, Janne Foss
    Hartwell, Dorthe
    Skovlund, Charlotte Wessel
    Langhoff-Roos, Jens
    Lidegaard, Ojvind
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2017, 96 (06) : 751 - 760
  • [4] Bissonnette F, 2019, Reprod Biomed Soc Online, V8, P32, DOI 10.1016/j.rbms.2019.01.002
  • [5] Assisted Reproductive Technology and Birth Defects Among Liveborn Infants in Florida, Massachusetts, and Michigan, 2000-2010
    Boulet, Sheree L.
    Kirby, Russell S.
    Reefhuis, Jennita
    Zhang, Yujia
    Sunderam, Saswati
    Cohen, Bruce
    Bernson, Dana
    Copeland, Glenn
    Bailey, Marie A.
    Jamieson, Denise J.
    Kissin, Dmitry M.
    [J]. JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2016, 170 (06)
  • [6] Estimating the prevalence of infertility in Canada
    Bushnik, Tracey
    Cook, Jocelynn L.
    Yuzpe, A. Albert
    Tough, Suzanne
    Collins, John
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2012, 27 (03) : 738 - 746
  • [7] Reproductive Technologies and the Risk of Birth Defects
    Davies, Michael J.
    Moore, Vivienne M.
    Willson, Kristyn J.
    Van Essen, Phillipa
    Priest, Kevin
    Scott, Heather
    Haan, Eric A.
    Chan, Annabelle
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 366 (19) : 1803 - 1813
  • [8] Estimates of the Live Births, Natural Losses, and Elective Terminations with Down Syndrome in the United States
    de Graaf, Gert
    Buckley, Frank
    Skotko, Brian G.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2015, 167 (04) : 756 - 767
  • [9] Endometriosis and assisted reproductive techniques independently related to mother- child morbidities: a French longitudinal national study
    Epelboin, Sylvie
    Labrosse, Julie
    Fauque, Patricia
    Levy, Rachel
    Gervoise-Boyer, Marie-Jose
    Devaux, Aviva
    Bergere, Marianne
    de Vienne, Claire
    Jonveaux, Philippe
    De Mouzon, Jacques
    Pessione, Fabienne
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2021, 42 (03) : 627 - 633
  • [10] Do in vitro fertilization, intrauterine insemination or female infertility impact the risk of congenital anomalies in singletons? A longitudinal national French study
    Fauque, Patricia
    De Mouzon, Jacques
    Devaux, Aviva
    Epelboin, Sylvie
    Gervoise-Boyer, Marie-Jose
    Levy, Rachel
    Valentin, Morgane
    Viot, Geraldine
    Bergere, Marianne
    De Vienne, Claire
    Jonveaux, Philippe
    Pessione, Fabienne
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 (03) : 808 - 816