Factors Influencing the Knowledge Level of Fish Consumers: An Explanatory Analysis

被引:0
作者
Mallappa, Vinaya Kumar Hebsale [1 ,2 ]
Panigrahy, Shakti Ranjan [2 ]
Nayak, Archit Kumar [2 ]
Pundir, Rambirsingh [2 ]
Kumari, Prity [2 ]
机构
[1] Keladi Shivappa Nayaka Univ Agr & Hort Sci, Agr Extens, AHRS, Sringeri, Yebbodi 577139, Karnataka, India
[2] Anand Agr Univ, ICAR NAHEP CAAST, Anand 388110, Gujarat, India
关键词
knowledge level; socio-psychological factors; health and nutritional benefits; fish quality evaluation; SEAFOOD CONSUMPTION; NUTRITION INFORMATION; FOOD; DETERMINANTS; PREFERENCES; HEALTH; INVOLVEMENT; PRODUCTS; PATTERNS; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.3390/su151310183
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Despite scientific proof of the benefits and effects of fish consumption on human health, most Indians consume less than the recommended dietary amounts. The current study attempted to assess the knowledge gap of fish eaters regarding the health and nutritional benefits, along with identifying the factors that directly and indirectly influence the knowledge level of fish consumers. The fish eaters were surveyed during the F.Y. 2021-2022 with representative samples of 934 fish consumers from across ten districts of the Gujarat state in western India. Fish consumers were found to have insufficient knowledge about health and nutritional benefits, which stalled the growth of fish consumption in the region. The significant factors influencing the knowledge level of fish consumers were education qualification, fish quality evaluation criteria, number of children in a family, years of fish consumption and family size. The consumers were found to place greater emphasis on the fish quality evaluation parameters such as smell, appearance, nutritional value, product price and freshness. The study's outcomes suggested that mass awareness programs should be planned to achieve higher levels of fish consumption in the region and the country.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 75 条
[11]   Motives, barriers and quality evaluation in fish consumption situations Exploring and comparing heavy and light users in Spain and Belgium [J].
Brunso, Karen ;
Verbeke, Wim ;
Olsen, Svein Ottar ;
Jeppesen, Lisbeth Fruensgaard .
BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2009, 111 (6-7) :699-716
[12]  
Burger J, 1999, RISK ANAL, V19, P427, DOI 10.1023/A:1007048628467
[13]   Are we reaching the target audience? Evaluation of a fish fact sheet [J].
Burger, J ;
Waishwell, L .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 277 (1-3) :77-86
[14]   Perceptions of the risks and benefits of fish consumption: Individual choices to reduce risk and increase health benefits [J].
Burger, Joanna ;
Gochfeld, Michael .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2009, 109 (03) :343-349
[15]   Fish consumption preferences and factors influencing it [J].
Can, Mehmet Ferit ;
Gunlu, Aytekin ;
Can, Hayriye Yesim .
FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 35 (02) :339-346
[16]   Survey into the seafood consumption preferences and patterns in the portuguese population. Gender and regional variability [J].
Cardoso, Carlos ;
Lourenco, Helena ;
Costa, Sara ;
Goncalves, Susana ;
Nunes, Maria Leonor .
APPETITE, 2013, 64 :20-31
[17]   Objective and Subjective Knowledge Relationships: A Quantitative Analysis of Consumer Research Findings [J].
Carlson, Jay P. ;
Vincent, Leslie H. ;
Hardesty, David M. ;
Bearden, William O. .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2009, 35 (05) :864-876
[18]  
Çolakoglu FA, 2006, SU URUN DERG, V23, P387
[19]  
FAO, 2018, STATE WORLD FISHERIE
[20]   Are Italian consumers of canned tuna fish sensitive to environmentally sustainable product attributes? [J].
Forleo, Maria Bonaventura ;
Romagnoli, Luca ;
Palmieri, Nadia .
BRITISH FOOD JOURNAL, 2023, 125 (02) :608-625