Fidelity and Clinical Competence in Providing Illness Management and Recovery: An Explorative Study

被引:0
|
作者
Roosenschoon, Bert-Jan [1 ,2 ]
van Weeghel, Jaap [3 ]
Deen, Mathijs L. [2 ,4 ]
van Esveld, Emmie W. [5 ]
Kamperman, Astrid M. [1 ]
Mulder, Cornelis L. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Epidemiol & Social Psychiat Res Inst, Dept Psychiat, Med Ctr, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, NL-3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Parnassia Psychiat Inst, Parnassia Acad, Kiwistr 32, NL-2552 DH The Hague, Netherlands
[3] Tilburg Univ, Tilburg Sch Social & Behav Sci, Dept TRANZO, POB 90153, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[4] Leiden Univ, Inst Psychol, Fac Social & Behav Sci, Wassenaarseweg 52, NL-2333 AK Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Yulius Mental Hlth, POB 1001, NL-3300 BA Dordrecht, Netherlands
[6] Parnassia Psychiat Inst, ANTES Mental Hlth Care, Albrandswaardsedijk 74, NL-3172 AA Poortugaal, Netherlands
关键词
Illness Management and Recovery; severe mental illness; psychosocial treatment; self-management; fidelity; recovery; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ASSERTIVE COMMUNITY TREATMENT; PROGRAM; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1007/s10597-023-01137-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) is a psychosocial intervention supporting people with serious mental illnesses. In this study, 15 IMR groups were assessed for fidelity and clinician competency to establish the implementation level of all IMR elements and explore complementarity of the IMR Treatment Integrity Scale (IT-IS) to the standard IMR Fidelity Scale. Use of the IT-IS was adapted, similar to the IMR Fidelity Scale. Descriptive statistics were applied. Implementation success of IMR elements varied widely on the IMR Fidelity Scale and IT-IS (M = 3.94, SD = 1.13, and M = 3.29, SD = 1.05, respectively). Twelve IMR elements (60%) were well-implemented, whereas eight (40%) were implemented insufficiently, including some critical cognitive-behavioral techniques (e.g., role-playing). The scales appeared largely complementary, though strongly correlated (r (13) = 0.74, p = 0.002). Providing all IMR elements adequately requires a variety of clinical skills. Specific additional training and supervision may be necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:1508 / 1520
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of the Illness Management and Recovery Scale in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder
    Fardig, Rickard
    Lewander, Tommy
    Fredriksson, Anders
    Melin, Lennart
    SCHIZOPHRENIA RESEARCH, 2011, 132 (2-3) : 157 - 164
  • [32] The “Critical” Elements of Illness Management and Recovery: Comparing Methodological Approaches
    Alan B. McGuire
    Lauren Luther
    Dominique White
    Laura M. White
    John McGrew
    Michelle P. Salyers
    Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 2016, 43 : 1 - 10
  • [33] Illness Perception in Turkish Schizophrenia Patients: A Qualitative Explorative Study
    Guner, Perihan
    ARCHIVES OF PSYCHIATRIC NURSING, 2014, 28 (06) : 405 - 412
  • [34] How to implement Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) in mental health service settings: evaluation of the implementation strategy
    Egeland, Karina Myhren
    Ruud, Torleif
    Ogden, Terje
    Fardig, Rickard
    Lindstrom, Jonas Christoffer
    Heiervang, Kristin Sverdvik
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH SYSTEMS, 2017, 11
  • [35] Participants' Lived Experience with the Illness Management and Recovery (IMR) Program in Relation to their Recovery-Process
    Jensen, Sofie B.
    Eplov, Lene F.
    Gammelgaard, Iben
    Mueser, Kim T.
    Petersen, Kirsten S.
    COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH JOURNAL, 2019, 55 (06) : 983 - 993
  • [36] A Randomized Controlled Trial of Illness Management and Recovery With an Active Control Group
    Salyers, Michelle P.
    McGuire, Alan B.
    Kukla, Marina
    Fukui, Sadaaki
    Lysaker, Paul H.
    Mueser, Kim T.
    PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES, 2014, 65 (08) : 1005 - 1011
  • [37] Participants' lived experience of pursuing personal goals in the Illness Management and Recovery program
    Jensen, Sofie B.
    Eplov, Lene Falgaard
    Mueser, Kim T.
    Petersen, Kirsten Schultz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 67 (04) : 360 - 368
  • [38] Identifying the minimal important difference in patient-reported outcome measures in the field of people with severe mental illness: a pre–post-analysis of the Illness Management and Recovery Programme
    Titus A. A. Beentjes
    Steven Teerenstra
    Hester Vermeulen
    Peter J. J. Goossens
    Maria W. G. Nijhuis-van der Sanden
    Betsie G. I. van Gaal
    Quality of Life Research, 2021, 30 : 1723 - 1733
  • [39] Association Between Fidelity to the Strengths Model of Case Management and Client Outcomes: A Quasi-Experimental Study
    Latimer, Eric
    Aubry, Tim
    Barrett, Beverley
    Bergeron-Leclerc, Christiane
    Briand, Catherine
    Durbin, Janet
    Goscha, Rick
    Krupa, Terry
    Roebuck, Maryann
    Vallee, Catherine
    Setliff, Alissa
    Yauck, Mamadou
    PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION JOURNAL, 2022, 45 (03) : 280 - 290
  • [40] Older Patients' Competence, Preferences, and Attitudes Toward Digital Technology Use: Explorative Study
    Terp, Rikke
    Kayser, Lars
    Lindhardt, Tove
    JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2021, 8 (02):