Using chord diagrams to explore article themes in 100 top-cited articles citing Hirsch's h-index since 2005 A bibliometric analysis

被引:1
作者
Lee, Yei-Soon [1 ]
Chow, Julie Chi [2 ,3 ]
Chien, Tsair-Wei [4 ]
Chou, Willy [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Tainan, Taiwan
[2] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Tainan, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Med Univ, Coll Med, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Med Res, Tainan, Taiwan
[5] Chiali Chi Mei Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Tainan, Taiwan
[6] Chung San Med Univ Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Taichung, Taiwan
[7] Chi Mei Med Ctr, 901 Chung Hwa Rd, Tainan 710, Taiwan
关键词
bibliometric analysis; chord diagram; choropleth maps; coword analysis; h-index; Web of Science; HOT-SPOTS; TRENDS; IMPACT; CITESPACE; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000033057
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The h-index is increasingly being used as a measure of individual research achievement (IRA). More than 4876 citing articles have been published and indexed in Web of Science. The articles citing the h-index that have made the greatest contribution to scientific academics are still unknown. It is also unclear which subject categories (SCs) can be classified based on their keywords. Methods: These 4976 citing articles have been collected from the Web of Science since 2005. SCs were classified using chord diagrams to visualize their associations of SCs and documents in 100 top-cited articles (T100hciting). In addition to chord diagrams, 6 visualizations were used to illustrate study results: choropleth maps were used to depict the geographical distribution of publications across countries, network diagrams were created by using coword analysis, box plots were created to complement the network diagrams, Sankey diagrams highlighted the 5 most important elements in each article entity, the dot plot was used for displaying T100hciting, and a radar plot was used to present the top 10 high-IRA elements of countries, institutes, departments, and authors based on category, journal impact factor, authorship, and L-index scores. Results: A coword cluster analysis indicates that the majority of articles come from the US (918, 18%) and China (603, 12%), the top 2 SCs are h-index and bibliometric analysis, and the top 5 countries account for 55% in T100hciting, such as the US (25%), Spain (10%), Netherlands (9%), China (6%), and Belgium (5%). In T100hciting, 4 SCs are included, namely, the h-index (72%), bibliometric analysis (24%), physics & multidisciplinary (3%), and infectious diseases (1%). Conclusion: A total of 7 visualizations were used to display the results in this study. Chord diagrams are suggested as a tool for future bibliographical studies to classify SCs Future bibliometrics with chord diagrams should not be limited to the topic of h-index-citing articles, as we did in this study.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields
    Alonso, S.
    Cabrerizo, F. J.
    Herrera-Viedma, E.
    Herrera, F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2009, 3 (04) : 273 - 289
  • [2] Beyond the Durfee square: Enhancing the h-index to score total publication output
    Anderson, Thomas R.
    Hankin, Robin K. S.
    Killworth, Peter D.
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2008, 76 (03) : 577 - 588
  • [3] Oviedo-García MA, 2021, RES EVALUAT, V30, P405, DOI 10.1093/reseval/rvab020
  • [4] Quantifying scholarly impact:: IQp versus the Hirsch h
    Antonakis, John
    Lalive, Rafael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 59 (06): : 956 - 969
  • [5] bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis
    Aria, Massimo
    Cuccurullo, Corrado
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2017, 11 (04) : 959 - 975
  • [6] Batagelj V, 2004, MATH VIS, P77
  • [7] Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests?
    Batista, Pablo D.
    Campiteli, Monica G.
    Kinouchi, Osame
    Martinez, Alexandre S.
    [J]. SCIENTOMETRICS, 2006, 68 (01) : 179 - 189
  • [8] Belikov AV., 2015, F1000Res, V4, P884, DOI [10.12688/f1000research.7070.1, DOI 10.12688/F1000RESEARCH.7070.1]
  • [9] Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index?: a comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine
    Bornmann, Lutz
    Mutz, Ruediger
    Daniel, Hans-Dieter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 59 (05): : 830 - 837
  • [10] What do we know about the h index?
    Bornmann, Lutz
    Daniel, Hans-Dieter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 58 (09): : 1381 - 1385