Asymmetric volatility connectedness between cryptocurrencies and energy: Dynamics and determinants

被引:4
作者
Wan, Yang [1 ]
Song, Yuncheng [2 ]
Zhang, Xinqian [2 ]
Yin, Zhichao [1 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Finance, Jinan, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ, Sch Econ, Jinan, Peoples R China
关键词
cryptocurrency; energy; dynamic equicorrelation; volatility connectedness; dynamic model averaging; COMMODITY; NETWORK; BITCOIN;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2023.1115200
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
We explore the dynamics and determinants of volatility connectedness between cryptocurrencies and energy. We employed a block dynamic equicorrelation model and a group volatility connectedness measurement to measure the cross-equicorrelation and volatility connectedness between cryptocurrencies and energy. We also adopted dynamic model averaging to identify the time-varying drivers. The results suggest that changes in cross-equicorrelation between the two groups were affected by influential global events and increased after the COVID-19 pandemic. Volatilities were transmitted in both directions between cryptocurrencies and energy, but the transmission from energy to cryptocurrencies is by far the strongest. The driver identification implies that the factors related to cryptocurrencies and global financial markets had important roles in explaining the volatility connectedness from cryptocurrencies to energy in some periods after the COVID-19 pandemic, but the effects were marginal. In contrast, factors such as electricity consumption, cryptocurrency turnovers, and VIX were important in affecting the volatility connectedness from energy to cryptocurrencies, and the effects depended on factors and changed over time.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   The volatility connectedness of the EU carbon market with commodity and financial markets in time- and frequency-domain: The role of the US economic policy uncertainty [J].
Adekoya, Oluwasegun B. ;
Oliyide, Johnson A. ;
Noman, Ambreen .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2021, 74 (74)
[2]   Interconnection between cryptocurrency and energy market: an analysis of volatility spillover [J].
Afjal, Mohd ;
Sajeev, Kavya Clanganthuruthil .
OPEC ENERGY REVIEW, 2022, 46 (03) :287-309
[3]   Return equicorrelation in the cryptocurrency market: Analysis and determinants [J].
Bouri, Elie ;
Xuan Vinh Vo ;
Saeed, Tareq .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 38
[4]   Testing for asymmetric nonlinear short- and long-run relationships between bitcoin, aggregate commodity and gold prices [J].
Bouri, Elie ;
Gupta, Rangan ;
Lahiani, Amine ;
Shahbaz, Muhammad .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2018, 57 :224-235
[5]  
Cheung Y. W., 2022, ACM COMPUT SURV, V30, P1038, DOI [10.1111/roie.12593, DOI 10.1111/ROIE.12593]
[6]   Bitcoin-energy markets interrelationships - New evidence [J].
Corbet, Shaen ;
Lucey, Brian ;
Yarovaya, Larisa .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2021, 70
[7]   Any port in a storm: Cryptocurrency safe-havens during the COVID-19 pandemic [J].
Corbet, Shaen ;
Hou, Yang ;
Hu, Yang ;
Larkin, Charles ;
Oxley, Les .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2020, 194
[8]   Exploring the dynamic relationships between cryptocurrencies and other financial assets [J].
Corbet, Shaen ;
Meegan, Andrew ;
Larkin, Charles ;
Lucey, Brian ;
Yarovaya, Larisa .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2018, 165 :28-34
[9]   On the network topology of variance decompositions: Measuring the connectedness of financial firms [J].
Diebold, Francis X. ;
Yilmaz, Kamil .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2014, 182 (01) :119-134
[10]   COVID-19, cryptocurrencies bubbles and digital market efficiency: sensitivity and similarity analysis [J].
El Montasser, Ghassen ;
Charfeddine, Lanouar ;
Benhamed, Adel .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 46