Is income inequality a stumbling block to the global natural gas market?

被引:6
作者
Zhao, Jun [1 ]
Dong, Kangyin [2 ]
Taghizadeh-Hesary, Farhad [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Chem Technol, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Int Business & Econ, Sch Int Trade & Econ, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[3] Tokai Univ, Sch Global Studies, Tokai, Japan
[4] Tokai Univ, TOKAI Res Inst Environm & Sustainabil TRIES, Tokai, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Income inequality; Natural gas consumption; Nonlinear and asymmetric analysis; Global case; RENEWABLE ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNETS CURVE; CO2 EMISSIONS EVIDENCE; PANEL-DATA ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; CHINA; COUNTRIES; LEVEL; URBANIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2023.106520
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The potential effect of narrowing income gap on natural gas use in the global dimension has not received much attention; thus, the main research topic of this paper is whether the realization of common prosperity has a significant nonlinear impact on natural gas. To explore this topic, this study first systematically analyzes the theoretical framework in the inequality-gas nexus, and then examines the role of narrowing income gap in influencing gas use based on a global sample dataset. We also explore the asymmetric impacts of income inequality and other influencing factors on gas use. The primary findings suggest that: (i) both income inequality and global gas use show an inverted U-shaped nexus; by implication, as the income gap widens, the global gas use expands, and the use of gas gradually decreases when the income gap peaks. This has been checked by a series of robustness tests. Moreover, we find that (ii) asymmetric impacts of income inequality on global gas use exist in different natural gas conditions. Therefore, some policy suggestions to narrow the income gap, rationalize income distribution, and formulate strategies according to local conditions are proposed.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Democratic Institutions, Natural Resources, and Income Inequality [J].
Hartwell, Christopher A. ;
Horvath, Roman ;
Horvathova, Eva ;
Popova, Olga .
COMPARATIVE ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2019, 61 (04) :531-550
[32]   Unveiling the asymmetric effects: global value chain participation and income inequality [J].
Jithin, P. .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2025, 57 (22) :2853-2868
[33]   A new approach to financial integration and market income inequality [J].
Inekwe, John Nkwoma ;
Jin, Yi ;
Valenzuela, Maria Rebecca .
EMERGING MARKETS REVIEW, 2018, 37 :134-147
[34]   Reducing inequalities: Toward the development of a market for income inequality [J].
Husted, Bryan W. ;
Salazar, Jose .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 245
[35]   Labor market institutions and income inequality: an empirical exploration [J].
César Calderón ;
Alberto Chong .
Public Choice, 2009, 138 :65-81
[36]   Do natural resources lead to a curse or blessing in terms of income inequality? [J].
Gemicioglu, Selcuk ;
Soyhan, Sinem ;
Mollavelioglu, M. Sukru .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2024, 88
[37]   Re-Estimating the Impact of Natural Gas on Global Carbon Emissions: The Role of Technological Innovation [J].
Dou, Yue ;
Zhao, Jun ;
Dong, Jiajia .
FRONTIERS IN ENERGY RESEARCH, 2021, 9
[38]   Income Inequality and Redistribution in Lithuania: The Role of Policy, Labor Market, Income, and Demographics [J].
Cerniauskas, Nerijus ;
Sologon, Denisa M. ;
O'Donoghue, Cathal ;
Tarasonis, Linas .
REVIEW OF INCOME AND WEALTH, 2022, 68 :S131-S166
[39]   The impact of city gas on income inequality in China: A regional heterogeneity analysis [J].
Yang, Tingru ;
Li, Hui ;
Zhang, Lingyue ;
Chen, Tianqi .
ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 169
[40]   How did the price and income elasticities of natural gas demand in China evolve from 1999 to 2015? The role of natural gas price reform [J].
Dong, Kangyin ;
Dong, Xiucheng ;
Sun, Renjin .
PETROLEUM SCIENCE, 2019, 16 (03) :685-700