Personalized loading conditions for homogenized finite element analysis of the distal sections of the radius

The microstructure of trabecular bone is known to adapt its morphology in response to mechanical loads for achieving a biomechanical homeostasis. Based on this form-function relationship, previous investigators either simulated the remodeling of bone to predict the resulting density and architecture for a specific loading or retraced physiological loading conditions from local density and architecture. The latter inverse approach includes quantifying bone morphology using computed tomography and calculating the relative importance of selected load cases by minimizing the fluctuation of a tissue loading level metric. Along this concept, the present study aims at identifying an optimal, personalized, multiaxial load case at the distal section of the human radius using in vivo HR-pQCT-based isotropic, homogenized finite element (hFE) analysis. The dataset consisted of HR-pQCT reconstructions of the 20 mm most distal section of 21 human fresh-frozen radii. We simulated six different unit canonical load cases (FX palmar-dorsal force, FY ulnar-radial force, FZ distal-proximal force, MX moment about palmar-dorsal, MY moment about ulnar-radial, MZ moment about distal-proximal) using a simplified and efficient hFE method based on a single isotropic bone phase. Once we used a homogeneous mean density (shape model) and once the original heterogeneous density distribution (shape + density model). Using an analytical formulation, we minimized the deviation of the resulting strain tensors epsilon(x) to a hydrostatic compressive reference strain epsilon(0), once for the 6 degrees of freedom (DOF) optimal (OPT) load case and for all individual 1 DOF load cases (FX, FY, FZ, MX, MY, MZ). All seven load cases were then extended in the nonlinear regime using the scaled displacements of the linear load cases as loading boundary conditions (MAX). We then compared the load cases and models for their objective function (OF) values, the stored energies and their ultimate strength using a specific torsor norm. Both shape and shape + density linear-optimized OPT models were dominated by a positive force in the z-direction (FZ). Transversal force DOFs were close to zero and mean moment DOFs were different depending on the model type. The inclusion of density distribution increased the influence and changed direction of MX and MY, while MZ was small in both models. The OPT load case had 12-15% lower objective function (OF) values than the FZ load case, depending on the model. Stored energies at the optimum were consistently 142-178% higher for the OPT load case than for the FZ load case. Differences in the nonlinear response maximum torsor norm ||t|| were heterogeneous, but consistently higher for OPT_MAX than FZ_MAX. We presented the proof of concept of an optimization procedure to estimate patient-specific loading conditions for hFE methods. In contrast to similar models, we included canonical load cases in all six DOFs and used a strain metric that favors hydrostatic compression. Based on a biomechanical analysis of the distal joint surfaces at the radius, the estimated load directions are plausible. For our dataset, the resulting OPT load case is close to the standard axial compression boundary conditions, usually used in HR-pQCT-based FE analysis today. But even using the present simplified hFE model, the optimized linear six DOF load case achieves a more homogeneous tissue loading and can absorb more than twice the energy than the standard uniaxial load case.