On the forensic relevance of tattoos: distinguishing black inks with energy dispersive spectroscopy and backscattered scanning electron microscopy

被引:0
作者
Pulcinelli, Thais [1 ]
da Silva, Thiago Gomes [2 ]
Moreira, Debora Duarte [3 ]
Lagoeiro, Leonardo Evangelista [4 ]
Agustini, Deonir [5 ]
Silva, Rhonan Ferreira [6 ,7 ]
Franco, Ademir [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Fac Sao Leopoldo Mandic, Div Forens Dent, Campinas, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Parana, Dept Cellular & Mol Biol, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[3] Fac Sao Leopoldo Mandic, Dept Oral Radiol, Campinas, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Parana, Dept Geol, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Parana, Ctr Electron Microscopy, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[6] Sci Police Goias, Dept Forens Anthropol & Dent, Goiania, Go, Brazil
[7] Univ Fed Goias, Dept Dent Forens Odontol, Goiania, Go, Brazil
[8] Fac Sao Leopoldo Mandic, Div Forens Dent, R Dr Jose Rocha Junqueira 13, Campinas, Brazil
[9] Sechenov Univ, Inst Dent, Dept Therapeut Dent, Moscow, Russia
关键词
Forensic dentistry; Human identification; Ink; Microscopy; Tattoo; IDENTIFICATION; NANOPARTICLES; PHOTOGRAPHS; RADIATION;
D O I
10.1007/s12024-024-00782-y
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study aimed to analyze black tattoo inks by means of energy dispersive spectroscopy and backscattered scanning electron microscopy.MethodsThe sample consisted of five types of commercial tattoo pigments of the black colour (Easy Glow((TM)), Electric Ink((TM)), Iron Works((TM)), Master Ink((TM)), and Viper((TM))). An Energy Dispersive Spectroscopy (EDS) detector (Silicon Drift Detector - SDD - type) attached to a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) device (Tescan Vega3 LMU, Libusina, Czech Republic) was used. X-ray characteristic signs were detected for each tattoo ink in an interval between 0 and 2.5 keV. The electron acceleration potential in the microscope was 15 keV. Two regions were analyzed for each sample (n=10). On each region, a micrography of backscattered electrons (BSE) was obtained. Means and standard deviations (SD) of the weight percentages (Wt%) were calculated.ResultsC and O were predominant, with a mean O/C ratio between 2.69 and 2.74 Wt%. Electric Ink and Master Ink were the most similar pigments, while Easy Glow was the most distinctive - with agglomerates of Al that had a concentration 25xhigher than other specimens. Other compounds detected in the sample were Cl and Cu.ConclusionEDS and SEM were efficient to distinguish black tattoo inks. These are our preliminary outcomes on the use of EDS and SEM to analyze black tattoo inks. Thus, careful interpretation is necessary to avoid rash applications in human identification practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1140 / 1146
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条