Relationship of Age And Mobility Levels During Physical Rehabilitation With Clinical Outcomes in Critical Illness

被引:3
作者
Mayer, Kirby P. [1 ]
Silva, Susan [2 ]
Beaty, Amanda [3 ,4 ]
Davenport, Anne [3 ,5 ]
Minniti, Melissa [3 ,6 ]
Dorn, Sara Uribe [4 ]
White, Lane S. [4 ,7 ]
Sabol, Valerie K. [2 ]
Pastva, Amy M. [3 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kentucky, Coll Hlth Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, Lexington, KY USA
[2] Duke Univ, Sch Nursing, Durham, NC USA
[3] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Div Phys Therapy, Durham, NC USA
[4] Dept Rehabil Serv, Duke Hlth, Durham, NC USA
[5] Sky Lakes Med Ctr, Dept Rehabil Therapy, Klamath Falls, OR USA
[6] James A Haley VA, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil Serv, Tampa, FL USA
[7] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Phys Therapy & Rehabil Sci, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[8] Duke Univ, Duke Claude D Pepper Older Amer Independence Ctr, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA
[9] Duke Univ, Sch Med, Phys Therapy Div, DUMC 104002, Durham, NC 27710 USA
关键词
Age; Critical illness; Mobility; Physical function; Rehabilitation; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; ACUTE RESPIRATORY-FAILURE; FUNCTIONAL DISABILITY; ADULT PATIENTS; ICU PATIENTS; MORTALITY; SURVIVORS; THERAPY; ILL;
D O I
10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100305
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine whether age, mobility level, and change in mobility level across the first 3 physical rehabilitation sessions associate with clinical outcomes of patients who are critically ill.Design: Retrospective, observational cohort study.Setting: Medical Intensive Care Unit (MICU).Participants: Hospitalized adults (n = 132) who received 3 or more, consecutive rehabilitation sessions in the MICU.Interventions: Not applicable.Measurements and Main Results: Sample included 132 patients with 60 (45%) classified as younger (18-59 years) and 72 (55%) as older (60+ years). The most common diagnosis was sepsis/septicemia (32.6%). Older relative to younger patients had a significantly slower rate of improvement in ICU Mobility Scale (IMS) scores across rehabilitation sessions (mean slope coefficient 0.3 vs 0.6 points, P<.001), were less likely to be discharged to home (30.6% vs 55.0%, P=.005), and were more likely to die within 12 months (41.7% vs 25.0%, P=.046). Covariate-adjusted models indicated greater early improvement in IMS scores were associated with discharge home (P=.005). Longer time to first rehabilitation session, lower initial IMS scores, and slower improvement in IMS scores were associated with increased ICU days (all P<.03).Conclusion: Older age and not achieving the mobility milestone of sitting at edge of bed or limited progression of mobility across sessions is associated with poor patient outcomes. Our findings suggest that age and mobility level contribute to outcome prognostication, and can aide in clinical phenotyping and rehabilitative service allocation.(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Physical Rehabilitation Core Outcomes In Critical illness (PRACTICE): protocol for development of a core outcome set
    Bronwen Connolly
    Linda Denehy
    Nicholas Hart
    Natalie Pattison
    Paula Williamson
    Bronagh Blackwood
    [J]. Trials, 19
  • [22] PRACTICE: Development of a Core Outcome Set for Trials of Physical Rehabilitation in Critical Illness
    Connolly, Bronwen A.
    Barclay, Matthew
    Davies, Chantal
    Hart, Nicholas
    Pattison, Natalie
    Sturmey, Gordon
    Williamson, Paula R.
    Needham, Dale M.
    Denehy, Linda
    Blackwood, Bronagh
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2024, 21 (12) : 1742 - 1750
  • [23] Acute kidney injury contributes to worse physical and quality of life outcomes in survivors of critical illness
    Mayer, Kirby P.
    Ortiz-Soriano, Victor M.
    Kalantar, Alborz
    Lambert, Joshua
    Morris, Peter E.
    Neyra, Javier A.
    [J]. BMC NEPHROLOGY, 2022, 23 (01)
  • [24] Definitions, epidemiology, and outcomes of persistent/chronic critical illness: a scoping review for translation to clinical practice
    Ohbe, Hiroyuki
    Satoh, Kasumi
    Totoki, Takaaki
    Tanikawa, Atsushi
    Shirasaki, Kasumi
    Kuribayashi, Yoshihide
    Tamura, Miku
    Takatani, Yudai
    Ishikura, Hiroyasu
    Nakamura, Kensuke
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE, 2024, 28 (01)
  • [25] Delirium in critical illness: clinical manifestations, outcomes, and management
    Stollings, Joanna L.
    Kotfis, Katarzyna
    Chanques, Gerald
    Pun, Brenda T.
    Pandharipande, Pratik P.
    Ely, E. Wesley
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 47 (10) : 1089 - 1103
  • [26] Critical illness VR rehabilitation device (X-VR-D): Evaluation of the potential use for early clinical rehabilitation
    Van de Meent, H.
    Baken, B. C. M.
    Van Opstal, S.
    Hogendoorn, P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (03) : 480 - 486
  • [27] Symptom Communication During Critical Illness The Impact of Age, Delirium, and Delirium Presentation
    Tate, Judith A.
    Sereika, Susan
    Divirgilio, Dana
    Nilsen, Marci
    Demerci, Jill
    Campbell, Grace
    Happ, Mary Beth
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GERONTOLOGICAL NURSING, 2013, 39 (08): : 28 - 38
  • [28] Surviving critical illness: what is next? An expert consensus statement on physical rehabilitation after hospital discharge
    M. E. Major
    R. Kwakman
    M. E. Kho
    B. Connolly
    D. McWilliams
    L. Denehy
    S. Hanekom
    S. Patman
    R. Gosselink
    C. Jones
    F. Nollet
    D. M. Needham
    R. H. H. Engelbert
    M. van der Schaaf
    [J]. Critical Care, 20
  • [29] Factors influencing physical activity and rehabilitation in survivors of critical illness: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies
    Parry, Selina M.
    Knight, Laura D.
    Connolly, Bronwen
    Baldwin, Claire
    Puthucheary, Zudin
    Morris, Peter
    Mortimore, Jessica
    Hart, Nicholas
    Denehy, Linda
    Granger, Catherine L.
    [J]. INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 43 (04) : 531 - 542