How Circular Economy Disclosure Responds to Institutional Determinants Empirical Evidences in Non-Financial European Firms

被引:6
作者
Pozzoli, Matteo [1 ]
Nastari, Raffaela [1 ]
Pisano, Sabrina [1 ]
Venuti, Marco [2 ]
机构
[1] Parthenope Univ, Dept Law, I-80133 Naples, Italy
[2] Pegaso Univ, Dept Business & Law, I-80143 Naples, Italy
关键词
circular economy; sustainability reporting; empirical study; institutional theory; nonfinancial European firms; environmental policy stringency index; GRI; assurance; SDG; environmentally sensitive sector; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS; ISOMORPHISM; CONTEXT; INFORMATION; GOVERNANCE; LEGITIMACY; PRESSURES; RELEVANT; QUALITY;
D O I
10.3390/su152216069
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Despite the increasing attention that the circular economy (CE) has received at the international level in recent years, the literature has paid limited attention to the importance of institutional factors that may influence firms' disclosure of CE. Thus, there is a gap in the study of CE disclosure, especially when compared with other studies dedicated to environmental disclosure. This paper aims to fill this gap by investigating the institutional pressures, in terms of coercive, normative, and mimetic factors, that influence firms' behavior with respect to CE disclosure. This research focuses on a sample of 366 nonfinancial firms, operating in 14 EU countries between 2015 and 2020. The results show that coercive and mimetic institutional pressures positively influence the level of CE disclosure issued by the firms. More specifically, the stringency of the environmental policy (coercive pressure) and the belonging to an environmentally sensitive sector (mimetic pressure) have a positive impact on the CE disclosure provided. With respect to normative pressure, the results are mixed. In fact, only the adoption of Global Reporting Initiatives' (GRIs) standard requirements is positively and significantly related to CE disclosure. The presence of an external assurance, as well as the commitment to the SDGs, is not significantly related to the CE disclosure. The absence of an analytical standard that organically addresses the issue of CE, by guiding companies in their disclosure, may explain the irrelevance of these factors in the process of convergence of the information produced. This research contributes to this area by filling a gap in the CE literature, providing some insights into the determinants of disclosure and the role of institutional pressures in influencing the level of CE information. In addition, the research adds to previous studies on disclosure by measuring the CE information provided by companies with an indicator developed based on specific environmental items collected from the Refinitiv Eikon database, which could be used in future research. The findings of this paper have some important practical implications. In particular, the results confirm to policymakers that stricter regulations have a positive impact on disclosures related to the CE. Thus, a new specific European regulation should promote more homogeneous and analytical CE disclosure, increasing the sensitivity among firms and practitioners on this topic. A similar approach may be followed for the same purpose by other regional or local policymakers. The paper also emphasizes the necessity of introducing more stringent regulations on assurance and SDGs by the regulatory or professional bodies to achieve greater uniformity of behavior by firms.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Sustainable Development and European Banks: A Non-Financial Disclosure Analysis
    Cosma, Simona
    Venturelli, Andrea
    Schwizer, Paola
    Boscia, Vittorio
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (15)
  • [2] Trends and determinants of corporate non-financial disclosure in Greece
    Skouloudis, Antonis
    Jones, Nikoleta
    Malesios, Chrisovaladis
    Evangelinos, Konstantinos
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 68 : 174 - 188
  • [3] Credibility of environmental issues in non-financial mandatory disclosure: Measurement and determinants
    Balluchi, Federica
    Lazzini, Arianna
    Torelli, Riccardo
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 288
  • [4] Early adoption of non-financial disclosure in family firms
    Manzi, Maria Angela
    Cirillo, Alessandro
    Mussolino, Donata
    Uman, Timur
    EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2024,
  • [5] Why Do Firms in Emerging Markets Report? A Stakeholder Theory Approach to Study the Determinants of Non-Financial Disclosure in Latin America
    Duran, Ignacio J.
    Rodrigo, Pablo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (09)
  • [6] Determinants and Economic Consequences of Non-financial Disclosure Quality
    Gao, Fang
    Dong, Yi
    Ni, Chenkai
    Fu, Renhui
    EUROPEAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2016, 25 (02) : 287 - 317
  • [7] Media, independent non-executive directors and strategy disclosure by non-financial listed firms in the UAE
    Hassan, Mostafa Kamal
    Lahyani, Fathia Elleuch
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUSINESS IN SOCIETY, 2019, 20 (02): : 216 - 239
  • [8] Does the Directive of the European Union on disclosure of non-financial and diversity information improve reporting?
    Traxler, Albert Anton
    Greiling, Dorothea
    Freinbichler, Margit
    Mayerhofer, Petra
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE, 2023, 19 (06) : 70 - 90
  • [9] Determinants and consequences of integrated reporting disclosures of non-financial listed firms in an emerging economy
    Senani, K. G. P.
    Ajward, Roshan
    Kumari, J. S.
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ACCOUNTING, 2022, : 1336 - 1355
  • [10] Directors' remuneration: A comparison of Italian and UK non-financial listed firms' disclosure
    Melis, Andrea
    Gaia, Silvia
    Carta, Silvia
    BRITISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2015, 47 (01) : 66 - 84