Life cycle sustainability assessment and circularity of geothermal power plants

被引:22
作者
Li, Jingyi [1 ,2 ]
Tarpani, Raphael Ricardo Zepon [1 ]
Stamford, Laurence [2 ]
Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Tyndall Ctr Climate Change Res, Dept Mech Aerosp & Civil Engn, Manchester, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Dept Chem Engn, Sustainable Ind Syst, Manchester, England
关键词
Geothermal electricity; Circular economy; Renewable energy; Sustainable development; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Literature review; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; ENERGY-CONVERSION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ABANDONED OIL; SYSTEMS EGS; TECHNOLOGIES; ACCEPTANCE; ENGAGEMENT; ECONOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2022.10.027
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Geothermal power generation is expected to increase fivefold worldwide by 2040 compared to 2018. The up-coming growth of geothermal power plants (GPPs) requires assessments of its role in tackling climate change and other impacts within complex environmental, economic and social systems. This study presents the first lit-erature review of GPPs, including comparisons among different GPP technologies, based on life cycle sustainabil-ity and circular economy perspectives. A total of 76 core literature studies on geothermal-related topics are reviewed, including technology choices, and critically discussed in terms of their environmental, economic, social and circular economy aspects. Firstly, seven life cycle environmental impact indicators (global warming, acidifi-cation, eutrophication, human toxicity, ozone depletion, photochemical oxidation, and cumulative energy de-mand) are compared both within GPP technologies and to other conventional electricity generation technologies (such as coal and hydro). Secondly, economic sustainability is considered via life cycle costing, and the results show that geothermal could be economically competitive when compared to solar photovoltaic (PV), hydro, and even wind energy sources. Thirdly, social aspects are discussed considering 15 articles that eval-uated concerns such as public acceptance, technology safety and local employment rate, although none rigor-ously considered a life cycle approach. Lastly, a total of 12 articles were found linking the circular economy with GPPs and elaborating on some of the'9Rs' framework. To improve the effectiveness of future research, stud-ies should focus on fulfilling major data gaps in literature such as the lack of detailed documentation for specific materials and background process choices in life cycle assessment databases. The development of GPPs can be an important alternative in efforts to decrease climate change impacts and pursue cleaner energy sources in coun-tries where geothermal energy is more easily available.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Institution of Chemical Engineers. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 156
页数:16
相关论文
共 131 条
[21]   The renewables cost challenge: Levelized cost of geothermal electric energy compared to other sources of primary energy - Review and case study [J].
Clauser, Christoph ;
Ewert, Markus .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 82 :3683-3693
[22]   LCA and Exergo-Environmental Evaluation of a Combined Heat and Power Double-Flash Geothermal Power Plant [J].
Colucci, Vitantonio ;
Manfrida, Giampaolo ;
Mendecka, Barbara ;
Talluri, Lorenzo ;
Zuffi, Claudio .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (04) :1-23
[23]   R1224yd(Z), R1233zd(E) and R1336mzz(Z) as replacements for R245fa: Experimental performance, interaction with lubricants and environmental impact [J].
Dawo, Fabian ;
Fleischmann, Jonas ;
Kaufmann, Florian ;
Schifflechner, Christopher ;
Eyerer, Sebastian ;
Wieland, Christoph ;
Spliethoff, Hartmut .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2021, 288
[24]   Green jobs and energy efficiency as strategies for economic growth and the reduction of environmental impacts [J].
Dell'Anna, Federico .
ENERGY POLICY, 2021, 149
[25]   A review of heat recovery applications for solar and geothermal power plants [J].
DeLovato, Nicolas ;
Sundarnath, Kavin ;
Cvijovic, Lazar ;
Kota, Krishna ;
Kuravi, Sarada .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2019, 114
[26]   The life cycle approach for assessing the impact of municipal solid waste incineration on the environment and on human health [J].
Di Maria, Francesco ;
Mastrantonio, Marina ;
Uccelli, Raffaella .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 776
[27]  
Ellen McArthur Foundation, 2020, CIRC EC INTR
[28]  
European Commission, 2020, long-term strategy. 2050 long-term strategy-european commission Online
[29]  
Fajri H., 2020, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, V448, DOI 10.1088/1755-1315/448/1/012020
[30]  
Fiaschi Daniele, 2021, E3S Web of Conferences, V238, DOI 10.1051/e3sconf/202123801010