Life cycle sustainability assessment and circularity of geothermal power plants

被引:22
作者
Li, Jingyi [1 ,2 ]
Tarpani, Raphael Ricardo Zepon [1 ]
Stamford, Laurence [2 ]
Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Tyndall Ctr Climate Change Res, Dept Mech Aerosp & Civil Engn, Manchester, England
[2] Univ Manchester, Dept Chem Engn, Sustainable Ind Syst, Manchester, England
关键词
Geothermal electricity; Circular economy; Renewable energy; Sustainable development; Life cycle assessment (LCA); Literature review; ENVIRONMENTAL-IMPACT; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; ENERGY-CONVERSION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ABANDONED OIL; SYSTEMS EGS; TECHNOLOGIES; ACCEPTANCE; ENGAGEMENT; ECONOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.spc.2022.10.027
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Geothermal power generation is expected to increase fivefold worldwide by 2040 compared to 2018. The up-coming growth of geothermal power plants (GPPs) requires assessments of its role in tackling climate change and other impacts within complex environmental, economic and social systems. This study presents the first lit-erature review of GPPs, including comparisons among different GPP technologies, based on life cycle sustainabil-ity and circular economy perspectives. A total of 76 core literature studies on geothermal-related topics are reviewed, including technology choices, and critically discussed in terms of their environmental, economic, social and circular economy aspects. Firstly, seven life cycle environmental impact indicators (global warming, acidifi-cation, eutrophication, human toxicity, ozone depletion, photochemical oxidation, and cumulative energy de-mand) are compared both within GPP technologies and to other conventional electricity generation technologies (such as coal and hydro). Secondly, economic sustainability is considered via life cycle costing, and the results show that geothermal could be economically competitive when compared to solar photovoltaic (PV), hydro, and even wind energy sources. Thirdly, social aspects are discussed considering 15 articles that eval-uated concerns such as public acceptance, technology safety and local employment rate, although none rigor-ously considered a life cycle approach. Lastly, a total of 12 articles were found linking the circular economy with GPPs and elaborating on some of the'9Rs' framework. To improve the effectiveness of future research, stud-ies should focus on fulfilling major data gaps in literature such as the lack of detailed documentation for specific materials and background process choices in life cycle assessment databases. The development of GPPs can be an important alternative in efforts to decrease climate change impacts and pursue cleaner energy sources in coun-tries where geothermal energy is more easily available.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Institution of Chemical Engineers. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 156
页数:16
相关论文
共 131 条
[91]   The environmental impacts and the carbon intensity of geothermal energy: A case study on the Hellisheioi plant [J].
Paulillo, Andrea ;
Striolo, Aberto ;
Lettieri, Paola .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 133
[92]   Is Recycling Always the Best Option? Environmental Assessment of Recycling of Seashell as Aggregates in Noise Barriers [J].
Peceno, Begona ;
Leiva, Carlos ;
Alonso-Farinas, Bernabe ;
Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro .
PROCESSES, 2020, 8 (07)
[93]   Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) of renewable energy technologies [J].
Pehnt, M .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2006, 31 (01) :55-71
[94]   Geothermal energy and the public: A case study on deliberative citizens' engagement in central Italy [J].
Pellizzone, Anna ;
Allansdottir, Agnes ;
De Franco, Roberto ;
Muttoni, Giovanni ;
Manzella, Adele .
ENERGY POLICY, 2017, 101 :561-570
[95]   Using life cycle assessment to achieve a circular economy [J].
Pena, Claudia ;
Civit, Barbara ;
Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro ;
Druckman, Angela ;
Caldeira-Pires, Armando ;
Weidema, Bo ;
Mieras, Eric ;
Wang, Feng ;
Fava, Jim ;
Canals, Llorenc Mila i ;
Cordella, Mauro ;
Arbuckle, Peter ;
Valdivia, Sonia ;
Fallaha, Sophie ;
Motta, Wladmir .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (02) :215-220
[96]  
Perman R, 2003, Natural resource and environmental economics
[97]  
Petersén M, 2019, EMERALD POINTS, P11
[98]  
Peterson Kol, 2019, Accessory Dwellings
[99]  
Polsky Y., 2009, SEG TECHN PROGR EXP, DOI [10.1190/1.3255790, DOI 10.1190/1.3255790]
[100]  
Potting J., 2017, Circular economy: measuring innovation in the product chain