A framework for policy mix analysis: assessing energy poverty policies

被引:12
作者
Bessa, Salome [1 ]
Gouveia, Joao Pedro [1 ]
机构
[1] NOVA Univ Lisbon, Sustainabil Inst, Ctr Environm & Sustainabil Res & CHANGE Global Cha, NOVA Sch Sci & Technol, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Policy mix; policy analysis; energy poverty; sustainable transitions; EFFICIENCY; GAP;
D O I
10.1080/21606544.2022.2153744
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Under the topics of climate change and sustainable transitions, the importance of policy mix understanding and energy poverty is simultaneously discussed. Both concepts do not have universal definitions, and literature focuses on building the different fragments of each one to design new ways to understand, analyze and develop policies. Energy poverty is complex and has a multitude of drivers, such as income, energy prices, and buildings/energy efficiency are examples of how different policies are required to erase this problem. Understanding how those policies work together and should be evaluated challenges new perspectives between different fields. Framed in this subject matter, and after an overview of its state of the art, a flexible and systemic framework for policy mix analysis is proposed considering five steps: definition of objectives, instrument selection, single instrument analysis, instruments interaction analysis, and evaluation. The major contribution of the proposed framework is a clear yet adaptable criterion for instruments interaction analysis. Energy poverty literature is reviewed in the optic of how policy mix can help develop and analyze policies for its erasing, and specific criteria for its instruments analysis are suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:438 / 454
页数:17
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Covenant of Mayors-Energy poverty
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Sustainable Development Goals, DOI DOI 10.14512/GAIA.28.2.1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Instrument Mixes for Environmental Policy
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2012, V6, P156, DOI DOI 10.1787/888932689883
[5]   Improving Energy Poverty Measurement in Southern European Regions through Equivalization of Modeled Energy Costs [J].
Antepara, Inigo ;
Papada, Lefkothea ;
Gouveia, Joao Pedro ;
Katsoulakos, Nikolas ;
Kaliampakos, Dimitris .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (14) :1-21
[6]   Policy mix: mess or merit? [J].
Bouma, J. A. ;
Verbraak, M. ;
Dietz, F. ;
Brouwer, R. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2019, 8 (01) :32-47
[7]  
Bouzarovski S., 2020, Third pan-EU energy poverty report of the EU Energy Poverty Observatory, DOI [DOI 10.2833/103649, 10.2833/103649]
[8]   Addressing fragmented government action: coordination, coherence, and integration [J].
Cejudo, Guillermo M. ;
Michel, Cynthia L. .
POLICY SCIENCES, 2017, 50 (04) :745-767
[9]   Characterizing the policy mix and its impact on eco-innovation: A patent analysis of energy-efficient technologies [J].
Costantini, Valeria ;
Crespi, Francesco ;
Palma, Alessandro .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2017, 46 (04) :799-819
[10]   Lost in translation: How legacy limits the OECD in promoting new policy mixes for sustainability transitions [J].
Diercks, Gijs .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2019, 48 (10)