Towards A new model of global health justice: the case of COVID-19 vaccines

被引:8
|
作者
Jecker, Nancy S. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Atuire, Caesar A. [4 ,5 ]
Bull, Susan D. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Bioeth & Humanities, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Johannesburg, Dept Philosophy, Auckland Pk, Auckland Pk, South Africa
[3] Univ Ghana, Dept Philosophy & Class, Accra, Ghana
[4] Univ Oxford, Ethox Ctr, Div Med Sci, Oxford, England
[5] Univ Oxford, Wellcome Ctr Ethics & Humanities, Div Med Sci, Oxford, England
[6] Univ Auckland, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
COVID-19; Ethics; Internationality; Resource Allocation; Right to Health;
D O I
10.1136/medethics-2022-108165
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper questions an exclusively state-centred framing of global health justice and proposes a multilateral alternative. Using the distribution of COVID-19 vaccines to illustrate, we bring to light a broad range of global actors up and down the chain of vaccine development who contribute to global vaccine inequities. Section 1 (Background) presents an overview of moments in which diverse global actors, each with their own priorities and aims, shaped subsequent vaccine distribution. Section 2 (Collective action failures) characterises collective action failures at each phase of vaccine development that contributed to global vaccine disparities. It identifies as critical the task of establishing upstream strategies to coordinate collective action at multiple stages across a range of actors. Section 3 (A Multilateral model of global health governance) takes up this task, identifying a convergence of interests among a range of stakeholders and proposing ways to realise them. Appealing to a responsibility to protect (R2P), a doctrine developed in response to human rights atrocities during the 1990s, we show how to operationalise R2P through a principle of subsidiarity and present ethical arguments in support of this approach.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 374
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] 'Where you live should not determine whether you live'. Global justice and the distribution of COVID-19 vaccines
    Collste, Goran
    ETHICS & GLOBAL POLITICS, 2022, 15 (02) : 43 - 54
  • [32] Mortality in schizophrenia: Towards a new health scandal? COVID-19 and schizophrenia
    Fond, Guillaume
    Llorca, Pierre-Michel
    Lancon, Christophe
    Auquier, Pascal
    Boyer, Laurent
    ANNALES MEDICO-PSYCHOLOGIQUES, 2021, 179 (04): : 353 - 362
  • [33] The Rise of Vectored Vaccines: A Legacy of the COVID-19 Global Crisis
    Silva, Danielle Soares de Oliveira
    da Fonseca, Flavio Guimaraes
    VACCINES, 2021, 9 (10)
  • [34] Global control of COVID-19: good vaccines may not suffice
    Eslava-Schmalbach, Javier
    Rosero, Eric B.
    Garzon-Orjuela, Nathaly
    REVISTA PANAMERICANA DE SALUD PUBLICA-PAN AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 45
  • [35] COVID-19 vaccines, public health goods and Catholic social teaching: Why justice must prevail over charity in the global vaccine distribution
    Ballano, Vivencio O.
    HTS TEOLOGIESE STUDIES-THEOLOGICAL STUDIES, 2022, 78 (04):
  • [36] COVID-19 and justice
    McMillan, John
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2020, 46 (10) : 639 - 640
  • [37] A Commentary on Realities of Developing COVID-19 Vaccines Discussed through the Global Health Safety Perspective
    Al-Qahtani, Wedad Saeed
    Safhi, Fatmah Ahmed
    VACCINES, 2021, 9 (03)
  • [38] A mathematical model of protein subunits COVID-19 vaccines
    Gholami, Samaneh
    Korosec, Chapin S.
    Farhang-Sardroodi, Suzan
    Dick, David W.
    Craig, Morgan
    Ghaemi, Mohammad Sajjad
    Ooi, Hsu Kiang
    Heffernan, Jane M.
    MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES, 2023, 358
  • [39] Advances in COVID-19 Vaccines and New Coronavirus Variants
    Liu, Mengchen
    Li, Yunqiao
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [40] Global Food Security in a Pandemic: The Case of the New Coronavirus (COVID-19)
    Lugo-Morin, Diosey Ramon
    WORLD, 2020, 1 (02):