An innovative bionic offshore wind foundation: Scaled suction caisson

被引:6
作者
Li, Dayong [1 ]
Zhao, Jipeng [1 ]
Wu, Yuqi [1 ]
Zhang, Yukun [2 ]
Liang, Hao [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr East China, Coll Pipeline & Civil Engn, 66 West Changjiang Rd, Qingdao 266580, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Univ Sci & Technol, Key Lab Civil Engn Disaster Prevent & Mitigat, Qingdao 266590, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Scaled suction caisson (SSC); Model test; Penetration; Bearing capacity; Limit analysis; HYBRID MONOPILE FOUNDATION; BUCKET FOUNDATIONS; BEARING BEHAVIOR; MODEL TESTS; TURBINE; INSTALLATION; STRENGTH; CAPACITY; DESIGN; SAND;
D O I
10.1016/j.rser.2023.114208
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper presents an innovative scaled suction caisson (SSC) for fixing offshore wind turbines (OWTs) to enhance its anti-overturning bearing capacity. The outer wall of the SSC is constructed with a scaled bionic structure referring to snakeskin scales, reducing resistance to installation and increasing pullout capacity, which is verified by model tests that the SSC requires less applied suction and provides higher horizontal bearing capacity in sandy soil compared with the traditional suction caisson (TSC) under the same caisson diameter and height. Also, model test results reveal that the SSC can reduce the height of soil plug and the scaled structure can effectively limit the SSC inclination in comparison to the TSC. Additionally, numerical results show that the ultimate bearing capacity for the SSC increases rapidly when the friction factor lambda between the caisson wall-soil interface ranges from 0 to 0.2. Moreover, the sidewall of the SSC dissipates less energy than that of the TSC due to the small displacement of soil near the sidewall. This study confirms that the SSC can eliminate grouting in the space between the top of the soil plug and the bottom of the cap, thus reducing the construction period, construction costs and avoiding marine pollution.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]   Load-bearing behavior of suction bucket foundations in sand [J].
Achmus, M. ;
Akdag, C. T. ;
Thieken, K. .
APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH, 2013, 43 :157-165
[2]   Penetration resistance of offshore skirted foundations and anchors in dense sand [J].
Andersen, Knut H. ;
Jostad, Hans Petter ;
Dyvik, Rune .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 134 (01) :106-116
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2023, 2023 global offshore wind power report
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Renewable Energy Market Update - June 2023
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Scaled-up investments and enabling frameworks will unlock offshore renewables potential
[6]  
Aubeny C, 2023, Ocean Eng, P273
[7]  
BNEF, 2023, China Galaxy gives a recommended rating for power equipment
[8]   Geotechnical fragility analysis of monopile foundations for offshore wind turbines in extreme storms [J].
Charlton, T. S. ;
Rouainia, M. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 182 :1126-1140
[9]   Seismic Bearing Capacity of Eccentrically and Obliquely Loaded Strip Footings on Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil [J].
Fathipour, Hessam ;
Payan, Meghdad .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2023, 23 (06)
[10]   General failure envelope of eccentrically and obliquely loaded strip footings resting on an inherently anisotropic granular medium [J].
Fathipour, Hessam ;
Payan, Meghdad ;
Chenari, Reza Jamshidi ;
Fatahi, Behzad .
COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2022, 146