Methodology for Selecting an Ideal Thermal Gasification Technique for Municipal Solid Waste Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

被引:0
作者
Kaneesamkandi, Zakariya [1 ]
Rehman, Ateekh Ur [2 ]
Usmani, Yusuf Siraj [2 ]
Sayeed, Abdul [1 ]
Alabi, Hammed Sodiq [1 ]
机构
[1] King Saud Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Saud Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 23期
关键词
municipal solid waste; gasification; fixed-bed gasifier; fluidized bed gasifier; multi-criteria decision making; FLUIDIZED-BED GASIFIER; BIOMASS; DESIGN; SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE; PYROLYSIS; SIZE;
D O I
10.3390/app132312675
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Featured Application Selecting the ideal strategy for thermal gasification of municipal solid waste from among different available gasification options using their important performance attributes is accomplished using multi-criteria decision analysis. This method will guide decision-makers like urban planners and energy engineers.Abstract Awareness of the consequences of waste mismanagement has resulted in urban planners looking for effective disposal techniques with the added benefit of energy generation. The decision regarding an energy conversion technique to adopt on a community level is based on different technology assessment factors with maximum weightage on environmental effects. Gasification techniques in general and thermal gasification strategies in particular are appropriate methods when environmental impacts are to be minimized. Thermal gasification techniques have evolved with different configurations, syngas generation rates, and other advantages and disadvantages; hence, the selection of the right technique is essential, and establishing guidelines for decision-makers is necessary. The six different gasifiers considered in the present study were updraft gasifiers, downdraft gasifiers, cross-draft gasifiers, bubbling fluidized bed gasifiers, circulating fluidized bed gasifiers, and dual-bed fluidized bed gasifiers. The assessments performed in the present study are based on the attributes of the different techniques using the multi-criteria decision method. Multi-criteria decision analysis is an appropriate method proven to be an ideal procedure in these situations. Attribute values for gasifier performance, environmental effects, economic performance indices, and fuel requirements were determined from collected waste assessment data and published information. Analysis was performed for both recycling and non-recycling scenarios of waste utilization by applying different weight scenarios for the attributes. Results of the study indicate that downdraft gasifiers showed the best performance in terms of environmental effects under the recycling scenario, with 0.1% and 0.0125% by volume of carbon dioxide and methane emissions, and under the non-recycling scenario, with 0.125% and 0.02% by volume of carbon dioxide and methane emissions. Downdraft gasifiers had high overall rankings in performance when evaluated against different entropy weights for both scenarios. The results of the study can be applied to urban communities in different climatic regions as well as for different scales of operation.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Carbon distribution and multi-criteria decision analysis of flexible waste biomass smouldering processing technologies [J].
Chen, Yuying ;
Lin, Shaorun ;
Qin, Yunzhu ;
Surawski, Nicholas C. ;
Huang, Xinyan .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 167 :183-193
[42]   Current and emerging waste-to-energy technologies: A comparative study with multi-criteria decision analysis [J].
Patil, Shivaraj Chandrakant ;
Schulze-Netzer, Corinna ;
Korpas, Magnus .
SMART ENERGY, 2024, 16
[43]   Comparative study on air gasification of plastic waste and conventional biomass based on coupling of AHP/TOPSIS multi-criteria decision analysis [J].
Mojaver, Mehran ;
Hasanzadeh, Rezgar ;
Azdast, Taher ;
Park, Chul B. .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2022, 286
[44]   Towards a Circular Economy in Jordan: Selecting Organic Waste Treatment Options Using a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach [J].
Abu-Qdais, Hani ;
Al-Omoush, Sarah ;
Jalalipour, Haniyeh ;
Nassour, Abdallah .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (05)
[45]   Identifying a preservation zone using multi-criteria decision analysis [J].
Farashi, A. ;
Naderi, M. ;
Parvian, N. .
ANIMAL BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2016, 39 (01) :29-36
[46]   CLASSIFYING NANOMATERIAL RISKS USING MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION ANALYSIS [J].
Linkov, I. ;
Steevens, J. ;
Chappell, M. ;
Tervonen, T. ;
Figueira, J. R. ;
Merad, M. .
NANOMATERIALS: RISKS AND BENEFITS, 2009, :179-+
[47]   The development and application of multi-criteria decision-making tool with consideration of uncertainty: The selection of a management strategy for the bio-degradable fraction in the municipal solid waste [J].
El Hanandeh, Ali ;
El-Zein, Abbas .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (02) :555-561
[48]   Identification of effective factors to select energy recovery technologies from municipal solid waste using multi-criteria decision making (MCDM): A review of thermochemical technologies [J].
Shahnazari, Arman ;
Rafiee, Mahta ;
Rohani, Abbas ;
Bhushan Nagar, Bharat ;
Ebrahiminik, Mohammad Ali ;
Aghkhani, Mohammad Hossien .
Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2020, 40
[49]   Simulation and performance analysis of municipal solid waste gasification in a novel hybrid fixed bed gasifier using Aspen plus [J].
Moshi, Robert Eliraison ;
Jande, Yusufu Abeid Chande ;
Kivevele, Thomas Thomas ;
Kim, W. S. .
ENERGY SOURCES PART A-RECOVERY UTILIZATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS, 2024, 46 (01) :13856-13868
[50]   Analysis and prioritisation of risks in a reverse logistics network using hybrid multi-criteria decision making methods [J].
Senthil, S. ;
Murugananthan, K. ;
Ramesh, A. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 179 :716-730