Conversion between sirolimus and everolimus in heart transplant recipients

被引:1
作者
Wert, Thomas J. [1 ,3 ]
Heeney, Stephanie [2 ]
Morrison, Maddy [1 ]
机构
[1] Vanderbilt Univ Sch Med, Dept Pharm, Nashville, TN USA
[2] Yale New Haven Hosp, Dept Pharm, Nashville, CT USA
[3] Vanderbilt Univ Sch Med, Dept Pharm, 3865 Robert Ave, Nashville, MO 63116 USA
关键词
everolimus; heart transplant; mTOR inhibitor; orthotopic heart transplant; sirolimus; CARDIAC ALLOGRAFT VASCULOPATHY; INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY; ACUTE REJECTION; REGISTRY; PREVENTION; FOCUS;
D O I
10.1111/ctr.15102
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundSirolimus and everolimus are mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) that may be included in immunosuppression regimens for orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) recipients. mTORi play a role in slowing progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy; however, they have poor tolerability, sometimes necessitating a change between agents or therapies. The literature surrounding a conversion between mTORi are incongruent, thus this study was designed to assess the concentration/dose ratio for each medication around the time of conversion to provide guidance for a conversion strategy between mTORi. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of adult OHT recipients who were maintained on both sirolimus- and everolimus-based immunosuppression regimens. The primary outcome was the concentration/dose (C/d) ratio of sirolimus to everolimus. Secondary outcomes included changes in hematologic and lipid labs and patient-reported intolerances. ResultsThe C/d ratio of sirolimus was 4.42, whereas the everolimus ratio was 2.23, resulting in a sirolimus: everolimus ratio of 1.98. Secondarily, after converting between mTORi, 93% of patients who reported intolerance(s) to one agent had a resolution of that intolerance. In our patient population, everolimus appeared better tolerated than sirolimus, with significantly more patients having no reported intolerances and significantly fewer patients experiencing edema. Other lab values were similar between patients receiving sirolimus and everolimus, except for an increased hemoglobin level in those receiving everolimus. ConclusionsThe conversion ratio of 1:2 observed in our population suggests OHT recipients may require an increased dose of EVL compared with SRL to maintain the same goal trough levels. A conversion between mTORi appeared to improve tolerability and did not lead to clinically significant worsening of any measured lab value.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Apparent clearance of sirolimus in heart transplant recipients: Impact of primary diagnosis and serum lipids [J].
Zahir, Hamim ;
Keogh, Anne M. ;
Akhlaghi, Fatemeh .
THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2006, 28 (05) :614-622
[32]   A lower incidence of cytomegalovirus infection in de novo heart transplant recipients randomized to everolimus [J].
Hill, James A. ;
Hummel, Manfred ;
Starling, Randall C. ;
Kobashigawa, Jon A. ;
Perrone, Sergio V. ;
Arizon, Jose M. ;
Simonsen, Svein ;
Abeywickrama, Kamal H. ;
Bara, Christoph .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 84 (11) :1436-1442
[33]   Everolimus Initiation and Early Calcineurin Inhibitor Withdrawal in Heart Transplant Recipients: A Randomized Trial [J].
Andreassen, A. K. ;
Andersson, B. ;
Gustafsson, F. ;
Eiskjaer, H. ;
Rdegran, G. ;
Gude, E. ;
Jansson, K. ;
Solbu, D. ;
Sigurdardottir, V. ;
Arora, S. ;
Dellgren, G. ;
Gullestad, L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 14 (08) :1828-1838
[34]   Safe conversion of mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine in kidney transplant recipients with sirolimus-based immunosuppression [J].
El-Agroudy, Amgad E. ;
El-Dahshan, Khaled F. ;
Wafa, Ehab W. ;
Sheashaa, Hussien A. ;
Gad, Ziad A. ;
Ismail, Amani M. ;
Shokeir, Ahmed A. ;
Ghoneim, Mohamed A. .
NEPHROLOGY, 2009, 14 (02) :255-261
[35]   Apparent clearance of sirolimus in heart transplant recipients: Impact of primary diagnosis and serum lipids [J].
Zahir, Hamim ;
Keogh, Anne M. ;
Akhlaghi, Fatemeh .
THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2006, 28 (06) :818-826
[36]   Sirolimus in renal transplant recipients with malignancies in Germany [J].
Naik, Marcel G. ;
Arns, Wolfgang ;
Budde, Klemens ;
Diekmann, Fritz ;
Eitner, Frank ;
Gwinner, Wilfried ;
Heyne, Nils ;
Jurgensen, Jan Steffen ;
Morath, Christian ;
Riester, Udo ;
Heller, Katharina M. ;
Fischereder, Michael .
CLINICAL KIDNEY JOURNAL, 2021, 14 (09) :2047-2058
[37]   Cellular and molecular immune profiles in renal transplant recipients after conversion from tacrolimus to sirolimus [J].
Gallon, Lorenzo ;
Traitanon, Opas ;
Sustento-Reodica, Nedjema ;
Leventhal, Joseph ;
Ansari, M. Javeed ;
Gehrau, Ricardo C. ;
Ariyamuthu, Venkatesh ;
De Serres, Sacha A. ;
Alvarado, Antonio ;
Chhabra, Darshika ;
Mathew, James M. ;
Najafian, Nader ;
Mas, Valeria .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 87 (04) :828-838
[38]   Everolimus and reduced cyclosporine trough levels in maintenance heart transplant recipients [J].
Schweiger, Martin ;
Wasler, Andre ;
Prenner, Guenther ;
Stiegler, Philipp ;
Stadlbauer, Vanessa ;
Schwarz, Michaela ;
Tscheliessnigg, Karlheinz .
TRANSPLANT IMMUNOLOGY, 2006, 16 (01) :46-51
[39]   How to use sirolimus in order to increase survival in heart transplant recipients? [J].
Zakliczynski, Michal ;
Pyka, Lukasz ;
Trybunia, Dominika ;
Nozynski, Jerzy ;
Przybylski, Roman ;
Zembala, Marian .
KARDIOCHIRURGIA I TORAKOCHIRURGIA POLSKA-POLISH JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 7 (04) :431-435
[40]   A Retrospective 12-Month Study of Conversion to Everolimus in Lung Transplant Recipients [J].
Roman, A. ;
Ussetti, P. ;
Zurbano, F. ;
Borro, J. M. ;
Sole, A. ;
Carreno, M. C. ;
Santos, F. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2011, 43 (07) :2693-2698