The Effect of Agricultural Biogas Plants on the Quality of Farm Energy Supply

被引:6
作者
Tyminska, Magdalena [1 ]
Skibko, Zbigniew [2 ]
Borusiewicz, Andrzej [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Acad Appl Sci Lomza, Dept Agron Modern Technol & Informat, Studencka 19, PL-18402 Lomza, Poland
[2] Bialystok Tech Univ, Fac Elect Engn, Wiejska 45A, PL-15351 Bialystok, Poland
关键词
agricultural biogas plant; energy quality; interference; farm; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; METHANE PRODUCTION; ORGANIC FRACTION; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.3390/en16124600
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Agricultural biogas plants are among the renewable energy sources. While they have many advantages, they are less common than photovoltaic or wind power plants. One of the reasons for the lack of support for the construction of new agricultural biogas plants is the belief that biogas plants will affect the operation of consumers connected in its immediate vicinity through interference introduced into the grid. This article presents the possibilities a biogas plant built on a farm offers. The impact of an on-farm biogas plant on the voltage parameters of a farm specializing in barnless cattle rearing is analyzed in detail. As demonstrated by the authors' research in one of the agricultural biogas plants (with an electrical capacity of 40 kW), these plants do not introduce significant disturbances to the power quality into the grid. The most significant changes in the parameters of the voltage supplying the farm under study were caused by the operation of the digester mixer installed in the fermenter. Thanks to the research, it was also possible to identify a problem with the effect of the digester mixer on the energy parameters produced in the biogas plant. This problem has so far not been noticed or corrected by biogas plant manufacturers.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Development and performance evaluation of small size household portable biogas plant for domestic use
    Abbas, Irfan
    Liu, Jizhan
    Noor, Rana Shahzad
    Faheem, Muhammad
    Farhan, Muhammad
    Ameen, Muhammad
    Shaikh, Sher Ali
    [J]. BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2022, 12 (08) : 3107 - 3119
  • [2] Akyrek Z., 2018, J. Energy Syst, V2, P160, DOI [10.30521/jes.455325, DOI 10.30521/JES.455325]
  • [3] Biogas upgrading and utilization: Current status and perspectives
    Angelidaki, Irini
    Treu, Laura
    Tsapekos, Panagiotis
    Luo, Gang
    Campanaro, Stefano
    Wenzel, Henrik
    Kougias, Panagiotis G.
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY ADVANCES, 2018, 36 (02) : 452 - 466
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2015, 61000430 EN
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, 501602010 EN EU
  • [6] Assessment of the fertiliser potential of digestates from farm and agroindustrial residues
    Antonio Alburquerque, Jose
    de la Fuente, Carlos
    Ferrer-Costa, Alicia
    Carrasco, Lucia
    Cegarra, Juan
    Abad, Manuel
    Pilar Bernal, Maria
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2012, 40 : 181 - 189
  • [7] Baldwin S., 2009, Development of a Calculator for the Techno-economic Assessment of Anaerobic Digestion Systems
  • [8] Agronomic Efficiency of Animal-Derived Organic Fertilizers and Their Effects on Biology and Fertility of Soil: A Review
    Bhunia, Shantanu
    Bhowmik, Ankita
    Mallick, Rambilash
    Mukherjee, Joydeep
    [J]. AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2021, 11 (05):
  • [9] Characteristics of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste and methane production: A review
    Campuzano, Rosalinda
    Gonzalez-Martinez, Simon
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2016, 54 : 3 - 12
  • [10] Derehajlo S., 2021, COOPERATION BIOGAS P