Critical barriers and countermeasures to urban regeneration from the stakeholder perspective: a literature review

被引:19
作者
Liao, Zhiwei [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Menglan [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Bldg & Real Estate, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE CITIES | 2023年 / 5卷
关键词
urban regeneration; stakeholders; sustainability; collaboration; bibliometric analysis; INDUSTRIAL LAND REDEVELOPMENT; DECISION-MAKING; HOUSING DEMOLITION; PROPERTY-RIGHTS; SUSTAINABLE TRANSFORMATION; BROWNFIELD REDEVELOPMENT; RURAL GENTRIFICATION; DEVELOPMENT-PROJECTS; RENEWAL PRACTICES; FORCED EVICTIONS;
D O I
10.3389/frsc.2023.1115648
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Urban renewal involves a wide range of stakeholders with diverse expectations and interests. Conflicts in urban renewal projects arise from intricate relationships among multiple stakeholders, hindering the urban renewal process. With a large amount of current literature examining the barriers, difficulties, and solutions in urban regeneration, a critical review is required to holistically summarize these main concerns and challenges from the stakeholder perspective. Based on 347 journal papers collected from the Web of Science core database, this study investigates the development, trajectory, and tendency of prior studies through a bibliometric analysis. Then, a critical review is documented with eight critical barriers in the economic and social aspects from the stakeholder perspective. To address these issues, this study proposes a strategic framework for value creation, collaborative governance, and benefit sharing. Accordingly, future research agendas are also presented. This study could provide researchers with a systematic understanding of the critical barriers and potential strategies in urban regeneration fields.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 207 条
[31]  
Donaldson R., 2013, Urban Forum, V2, P173, DOI [10.1007/s12132-012-9182-9, DOI 10.1007/S12132-012-9182-9]
[32]   Urban regeneration in the light of social innovation: A systematic integrative literature review [J].
dos Santos Figueiredo, Yohani Dominik ;
Prim, Marcia Aparecida ;
Dandolini, Gertrudes Aparecida .
LAND USE POLICY, 2022, 113
[33]   The Politics of the Evicted: Redevelopment, Subjectivity, and Difference in Mumbai's Slum Frontier [J].
Doshi, Sapana .
ANTIPODE, 2013, 45 (04) :844-865
[35]   Displacement and solidarity: An ethic of place-making [J].
Eckenwiler, Lisa .
BIOETHICS, 2018, 32 (09) :562-568
[36]   Institutional stakeholder participation in urban redevelopment in Tehran: An evaluation of decisions and actions [J].
Erfani, Goran ;
Roe, Maggie .
LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 91
[37]   Mapping stakeholder perception on the challenges of brownfield sites' redevelopment in waterfronts: the Tagus Estuary [J].
Fernandes, Andre ;
de Sousa, Joao Figueira ;
Costa, Joao Pedro ;
Neves, Bruno .
EUROPEAN PLANNING STUDIES, 2020, 28 (12) :2447-2464
[38]   Framing territorial regeneration decisions: Purpose, perspective and scope [J].
Ferretti, V. .
LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 102
[39]   Circular economy strategies for adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings to reduce environmental impacts [J].
Foster, Gillian .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2020, 152
[40]   Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and Its Future [J].
Fung, Archon .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2015, 75 (04) :513-522