Evolution of compound eye morphology underlies differences in vision between closely related Drosophila species

被引:5
作者
Buffry, Alexandra D. [1 ]
Currea, John P. [2 ]
Franke-Gerth, Franziska A. [3 ]
Palavalli-Nettimi, Ravindra [4 ,5 ]
Bodey, Andrew J. [6 ]
Rau, Christoph [6 ]
Samadi, Nazanin [7 ]
Gstoehl, Stefan J. [7 ]
Schlepuetz, Christian M. [7 ]
McGregor, Alistair P. [8 ]
Sumner-Rooney, Lauren [9 ]
Theobald, Jamie [4 ,5 ]
Kittelmann, Maike [1 ]
机构
[1] Oxford Brookes Univ, Dept Biol & Med Sci, Oxford OX3 0BP, England
[2] UCLA, Integrat Biol & Physiol Dept, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Univ Leipzig, Inst Biol, Mol Evolut & Systemat Anim, Talstr 33, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
[4] Florida Int Univ, Inst Environm, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[5] Florida Int Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Miami, FL USA
[6] Diamond Light Source Ltd, Harwell Sci & Innovat Campus, Didcot, England
[7] Paul Scherrer Inst, Swiss Light Source, Forschungsstr 111, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
[8] Univ Durham, Dept Biosci, South Rd, Durham DH1 3LE, England
[9] Leibniz Inst Evolut & Biodivers Res, Museum Nat kunde, D-10115 Berlin, Germany
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Drosophila; Eye size; Evolution; Ommatidia; Vision; Acuity; Contrast; Field of view; Optic lobe; CELL NUMBER; SIZE; MELANOGASTER; SIMULANS; ACUITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12915-024-01864-7
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
BackgroundInsects have evolved complex visual systems and display an astonishing range of adaptations for diverse ecological niches. Species of Drosophila melanogaster subgroup exhibit extensive intra- and interspecific differences in compound eye size. These differences provide an excellent opportunity to better understand variation in insect eye structure and the impact on vision. Here we further explored the difference in eye size between D. mauritiana and its sibling species D. simulans. ResultsWe confirmed that D. mauritiana have rapidly evolved larger eyes as a result of more and wider ommatidia than D. simulans since they recently diverged approximately 240,000 years ago. The functional impact of eye size, and specifically ommatidia size, is often only estimated based on the rigid surface morphology of the compound eye. Therefore, we used 3D synchrotron radiation tomography to measure optical parameters in 3D, predict optical capacity, and compare the modelled vision to in vivo optomotor responses. Our optical models predicted higher contrast sensitivity for D. mauritiana, which we verified by presenting sinusoidal gratings to tethered flies in a flight arena. Similarly, we confirmed the higher spatial acuity predicted for Drosophila simulans with smaller ommatidia and found evidence for higher temporal resolution. ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that even subtle differences in ommatidia size between closely related Drosophila species can impact the vision of these insects. Therefore, further comparative studies of intra- and interspecific variation in eye morphology and the consequences for vision among other Drosophila species, other dipterans and other insects are needed to better understand compound eye structure-function and how the diversification of eye size, shape, and function has helped insects to adapt to the vast range of ecological niches.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]  
Adams Dean, 2024, CRAN
[2]   Genetic and developmental analysis of differences in eye and face morphology between Drosophila simulans and Drosophila mauritiana [J].
Arif, Saad ;
Hilbrant, Maarten ;
Hopfen, Corinna ;
Almudi, Isabel ;
Nunes, Maria D. S. ;
Posnien, Nico ;
Kuncheria, Linta ;
Tanaka, Kentaro ;
Mitteroecker, Philipp ;
Schloetterer, Christian ;
McGregor, Alistair P. .
EVOLUTION & DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 15 (04) :257-267
[3]   geomorph v4.0 and gmShiny: Enhanced analytics and a new graphical interface for a comprehensive morphometric experience [J].
Baken, Erica K. ;
Collyer, Michael L. ;
Kaliontzopoulou, Antigoni ;
Adams, Dean C. .
METHODS IN ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 12 (12) :2355-2363
[4]   Head morphology of Tricholepidion gertschi indicates monophyletic Zygentoma [J].
Blanke, Alexander ;
Koch, Markus ;
Wipfler, Benjamin ;
Wilde, Fabian ;
Misof, Bernhard .
FRONTIERS IN ZOOLOGY, 2014, 11
[5]   INTRINSIC GROWTH-CONTROL IN THE IMAGINAL PRIMORDIA OF DROSOPHILA, AND THE AUTONOMOUS ACTION OF A LETHAL MUTATION CAUSING OVERGROWTH [J].
BRYANT, PJ ;
LEVINSON, P .
DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY, 1985, 107 (02) :355-363
[6]   Variation in Pleiotropic Hub Gene Expression Is Associated with Interspecific Differences in Head Shape and Eye Size in Drosophila [J].
Buchberger, Elisa ;
Bilen, Anil ;
Ayaz, Sanem ;
Salamanca, David ;
de las Heras, Cristina Matas ;
Niksic, Armin ;
Almudi, Isabel ;
Torres-Oliva, Montserrat ;
Casares, Fernando ;
Posnien, Nico .
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2021, 38 (05) :1924-1942
[7]  
Buffry AD, 2024, figshare
[8]  
Calboli FCF, 2003, EVOLUTION, V57, P566, DOI 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb01548.x
[9]   Body size determination in insects: a review and synthesis of size- and brain-dependent and independent mechanisms [J].
Callier, Viviane ;
Nijhout, H. Frederik .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2013, 88 (04) :944-954
[10]   DEVELOPMENT AND QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF CORRELATION STRUCTURE AMONG BODY PARTS OF DROSOPHILA-MELANOGASTER [J].
COWLEY, DE ;
ATCHLEY, WR .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1990, 135 (02) :242-268