Critical Success Factors for Enhancing the Community Economic Well-being

被引:1
作者
Megasari, Rizza [1 ]
Sahid, Sheerad [1 ]
Hussin, Muhammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Fac Educ, Bangi, Malaysia
来源
SOCIAL WELFARE INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH | 2023年 / 13卷
关键词
economic well-being; income; wealth; literacy; life satisfaction; work-life integration; FARM;
D O I
10.15388/SW.2023.13.13
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Well-being is not only defined objectively but also subjectively that refers to the study of happiness and life satisfaction. This study aims to analyze measurement indicators and factors that influence economic well-being based on previous studies discussing economic well-being and the factors that influence it. To provide a systematic review of the literature, we adopted a Prisma-based flowchart model to achieve a deeper understanding. The findings show that the main indicator that is often used in measuring economic well-being is income, followed by wealth, consumption expenditure, employment status, productivity, financial stability, inequality, and education level. This result also confirms that literacy levels such as entrepreneurial literacy, health literacy, food literacy, and financial literacy are factors that affect economic well-being. In addition, life satisfaction with work and education, economic behavior both in consumption and production as well as work-life balance in the division of time for work and other personal matters also affect the level of individual and community economic well-being. From the results of the study obtained, it can contribute to the government as a policy maker to pay attention to the well-being of the community. In addition, it provides another description of the factors that influence economic well-being for further research, like home economic literacy.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 58
页数:17
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Achyunda R., 2019, Indonesia Sustainable Welfare Index (ISWI) Measuring Sustainable Economic Welfare at Digital Era, P1
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, HOWS LIFE MEASURING, DOI DOI 10.1787/9789264121164-EN
  • [3] Aryogi I., 2016, J Ilmu Ekon Terap, V1, P1, DOI [10.20473/jiet.v1i1.1900, DOI 10.20473/JIET.V1I1.1900]
  • [4] Australian Bureau of Statistic, 2015, ECONOMIC WELLBEING
  • [5] Cahyadi D, 2017, Analisis Pengukuran Kesejahteraan Di Indonesia Jurnal Ilmiah
  • [6] Does participation in the conservation reserve program impact the economic well-being of farm households?
    Chang, Hung-Hao
    Lambert, Dayton M.
    Mishra, Ashok K.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 38 (02) : 201 - 212
  • [7] STUDY OF INDICATORS OF THE LEVEL OF DEVELOPMENT OF MATERIAL WELL-BEING OF THE POPULATION, THE PROBLEM OF INEQUALITY AND POVERTY IN UKRAINE IN THE CONTEXT OF STATISTICAL EVALUATION
    Cherep, Oleksandr
    Helman, Valentyna
    Makazan, Evgeniya
    [J]. BALTIC JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2022, 8 (02) : 162 - 172
  • [8] Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress
    Diener, E
    Suh, EM
    Lucas, RE
    Smith, HL
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1999, 125 (02) : 276 - 302
  • [9] SUBJECTIVE WELL-BEING
    DIENER, E
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1984, 95 (03) : 542 - 575
  • [10] Druzic M, 2017, ZAGREB INT REV ECON, V20, P21, DOI 10.1515/zireb-2017-0015