Consideration of Sustainability in Projects: A Cross-Sectional Quantitative Analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Magano, Jose [1 ,2 ]
Silvius, Gilbert [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Nogueira, Teresa [6 ,7 ]
Hamed, Farzad [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Lisboa, Res Ctr Business & Econ CICEE, Rua Sta Marta 47,5 Andar, P-1150293 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Higher Inst Business Sci & Tourism ISCET, P-4050180 Porto, Portugal
[3] Wittenborg Univ Appl Sci, Res Ctr, Apeldoorn Campus,Brinklaan 268, NL-7311 JD Apeldoorn, Netherlands
[4] HU Univ Appl Sci Utrecht, Inst People & Business, Padualaan 101, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Univ Johannesburg, Coll Business & Econ, Dept Appl Informat Syst, Auckland Pk Bunting Rd Campus, ZA-2006 Johannesburg, South Africa
[6] Polytech Inst Porto P Porto, Sch Engn, P-4249015 Porto, Portugal
[7] Ctr Innovat Engn & Ind Technol CIETI, P Porto, R Dr Antonio Benardino de Almeida 431, P-4249015 Porto, Portugal
关键词
sustainable project management; project management maturity; triple bottom line; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3390/su16031269
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The consideration of sustainability in projects is one of the most critical global trends in project management today, as projects are instrumental in the sustainable development of organisations and society. In the growing literature on this topic, most studies take a qualitative approach, often based on single case studies, and quantitative studies are underrepresented. To address these limitations, this study aims to examine the extent to which different aspects and perspectives of sustainability are integrated into projects by reporting a quantitative analysis of the consideration of sustainability in 134 projects. The analysis used the Sustainable Project Management Maturity Model SPM3 to analyse the level at which sustainability was considered in the projects. The results show that, on average, sustainability is considered at a reactive level, with the desired levels of consideration on average one level higher (proactive). When considering the different triple bottom line perspectives, the economic perspective scores highest, followed by the social and environmental perspectives. The study also shows that building-related projects score higher on sustainability considerations than other project types, as do larger projects. Limitations of the study include its European focus, the relatively small sample size, and the fact that the data was collected in different locations over a four-year period, which raises the possibility of subjective differences in the evaluation of individual projects. Nevertheless, the study can be seen as a 'wake-up call' for project practitioners, who need to be more proactive in this regard if projects are to be the route to sustainability.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of the COPD Assessment Test and GOLD patient types: a cross-sectional analysis
    Luis Lopez-Campos, Jose
    Fernandez-Villar, Alberto
    Calero-Acuna, Carmen
    Represas-Represas, Cristina
    Lopez-Ramirez, Cecilia
    Leiro Fernandez, Virginia
    Jose Soler-Cataluna, Juan
    Casamor, Ricard
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE, 2015, 10 : 975 - 984
  • [32] Presenteeism and noise perception at work: a cross-sectional study using association analysis
    Cardoso Rocha Tavares, Renata da Silva
    Silva, Luiz Felipe
    Muniz Junior, Jorge
    SAO PAULO MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 141 (01): : 36 - 44
  • [33] Analysis of Healthcare Utilization for Primary Dysmenorrhea in Korea: A Retrospective, Cross-Sectional Study
    Park, Jinhun
    Lim, Yu-Cheol
    Hwang, Deok-Sang
    Ha, In-Hyuk
    Lee, Ye-Seul
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2022, 14 : 1015 - 1027
  • [34] Incidental Pancreatic Cysts on Cross-Sectional Imaging
    Navarro, Shannon M.
    Corwin, Michael T.
    Katz, Douglas S.
    Lamba, Ramit
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2021, 59 (04) : 617 - 629
  • [35] Musculoskeletal manifestations in Alkaptonuria A cross-sectional study
    Khan, Aysha Habib
    Afroze, Bushra
    Majid, Hafsa
    Zaidi, Yusra
    Jamil, Azeema
    Jafri, Lena
    MEDICINE, 2021, 100 (51) : E28241
  • [36] Outcomes of pediatric thyroidectomy: a cross-sectional evaluation
    Azari, Sarah
    Randolph, Jackson
    Shi, Harry
    Hoover, Travis
    Weaver, Daniel
    Mattioni, Jillian
    Chennupati, Sri Kiran
    WORLD JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2020, 3 (04)
  • [37] A Cross-Sectional Study of the Current Management of Hypertriglyceridemia
    Jar, Raghad A.
    Melibari, Ealaf
    Almehmadi, Nidaa
    Kalantan, Renad O.
    Ahmed, Mohamed E.
    Kinsara, Abdulhalim J.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (12)
  • [38] Developmental Anomalies of Teeth - A cross-sectional study
    Chaudhry, Sana
    Hameedi, Shahlisa
    Altaf, Junaid
    Gul, Hafsa
    Bhutta, Nadia
    Sajjad, Mehwish
    PAKISTAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2021, 15 (09): : 2477 - 2479
  • [39] Cross-sectional imaging in refractory celiac disease
    Al-Bawardy, Badr
    Barlow, John M.
    Vasconcelos, Rogerio N.
    Kim, Sarasa T.
    Bruining, David H.
    Hansel, Stephanie L.
    Sheedy, Shannon P.
    Murray, Joseph A.
    Rubio-Tapia, Alberto
    Rajan, Elizabeth
    Fidler, Jeff L.
    Fletcher, Joel G.
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2017, 42 (02) : 389 - 395
  • [40] Incidental Splenic Findings on Cross-Sectional Imaging
    Wei, Pei-Kang
    Lee, Karen S.
    Siewert, Bettina
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2021, 59 (04) : 603 - 616