Consideration of Sustainability in Projects: A Cross-Sectional Quantitative Analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Magano, Jose [1 ,2 ]
Silvius, Gilbert [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Nogueira, Teresa [6 ,7 ]
Hamed, Farzad [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Autonoma Lisboa, Res Ctr Business & Econ CICEE, Rua Sta Marta 47,5 Andar, P-1150293 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Higher Inst Business Sci & Tourism ISCET, P-4050180 Porto, Portugal
[3] Wittenborg Univ Appl Sci, Res Ctr, Apeldoorn Campus,Brinklaan 268, NL-7311 JD Apeldoorn, Netherlands
[4] HU Univ Appl Sci Utrecht, Inst People & Business, Padualaan 101, NL-3584 CH Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Univ Johannesburg, Coll Business & Econ, Dept Appl Informat Syst, Auckland Pk Bunting Rd Campus, ZA-2006 Johannesburg, South Africa
[6] Polytech Inst Porto P Porto, Sch Engn, P-4249015 Porto, Portugal
[7] Ctr Innovat Engn & Ind Technol CIETI, P Porto, R Dr Antonio Benardino de Almeida 431, P-4249015 Porto, Portugal
关键词
sustainable project management; project management maturity; triple bottom line; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.3390/su16031269
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The consideration of sustainability in projects is one of the most critical global trends in project management today, as projects are instrumental in the sustainable development of organisations and society. In the growing literature on this topic, most studies take a qualitative approach, often based on single case studies, and quantitative studies are underrepresented. To address these limitations, this study aims to examine the extent to which different aspects and perspectives of sustainability are integrated into projects by reporting a quantitative analysis of the consideration of sustainability in 134 projects. The analysis used the Sustainable Project Management Maturity Model SPM3 to analyse the level at which sustainability was considered in the projects. The results show that, on average, sustainability is considered at a reactive level, with the desired levels of consideration on average one level higher (proactive). When considering the different triple bottom line perspectives, the economic perspective scores highest, followed by the social and environmental perspectives. The study also shows that building-related projects score higher on sustainability considerations than other project types, as do larger projects. Limitations of the study include its European focus, the relatively small sample size, and the fact that the data was collected in different locations over a four-year period, which raises the possibility of subjective differences in the evaluation of individual projects. Nevertheless, the study can be seen as a 'wake-up call' for project practitioners, who need to be more proactive in this regard if projects are to be the route to sustainability.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A cross-sectional analysis of reported corporate environmental sustainability practices
    Cowan, Dallas M.
    Dopart, Pamela
    Ferracini, Tyler
    Sahmel, Jennifer
    Merryman, Kimberly
    Gaffney, Shannon
    Paustenbach, Dennis J.
    REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2010, 58 (03) : 524 - 538
  • [2] A cross-sectional panel ARDL approach to fiscal sustainability analysis
    Campos, Eduardo Lima
    Cysne, Rubens Penha
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2025, 28 (01)
  • [3] A CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY OF SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT
    Popescu, Gabriel
    Boboc, Dan
    Stoian, Mirela
    Zaharia, Alina
    Ladaru, Georgiana Raluca
    ECONOMIC COMPUTATION AND ECONOMIC CYBERNETICS STUDIES AND RESEARCH, 2017, 51 (01): : 21 - 36
  • [4] Evidence from cross-sectional and longitudinal quantitative MRI analysis
    Liu, R.
    EPILEPSIA, 2006, 47 : 263 - 263
  • [5] Quantitative longitudinal and cross-sectional shape analysis of retina by registration
    Lee, Sieun
    Heisler, Morgan
    Mackenzie, Paul
    Sarunic, Marinko V.
    Beg, Mirza Faisal
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2015, 56 (07)
  • [6] A cross-sectional review: Impacts and sustainability of small-scale renewable energy projects in developing countries
    Terrapon-Pfaff, Julia
    Dienst, Carmen
    Koenig, Julian
    Ortiz, Willington
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 40 : 1 - 10
  • [7] Cross-Sectional Analysis of Critical Risk Factors for PPP Water Projects in China
    Chan, Albert P. C.
    Lam, Patrick T. I.
    Wen, Yang
    Ameyaw, Ernest E.
    Wang, Shouqing
    Ke, Yongjian
    JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2015, 21 (01)
  • [8] Quantitative Ultrasound Analysis of Oral Mucosa: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study
    Di Stasio, Dario
    Romano, Antonio
    Montella, Marco
    Contaldo, Maria
    Petruzzi, Massimo
    Hasan, Iquebal
    Serpico, Rosario
    Lucchese, Alberta
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (14):
  • [9] Anxiety immediately before endodontic treatment: cross-sectional quantitative analysis
    Busatto, Paloma Frigo
    Baldissarelli, Flavia
    Pelepenko, Lauter Eston
    Vanni, Jose Roberto
    Fornari, Volmir Joao
    Rigo, Lilian
    Hartmann, Mateus Silveira Martins
    DISCOVER PSYCHOLOGY, 2024, 4 (01):
  • [10] The sustainability of hospital accreditation models: a cross-sectional study
    Hussein, Mohammed
    Pavlova, Milena
    Groot, Wim
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2025, 37 (01)